Explaining Risk Attitude in Framing Tasks by Regulatory Focus: A Verbal Protocol Analysis and a Simulation Using Fuzzy Logic

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1120.0254

References

  • Bothe HH. Neuro-Fuzzy-Methoden (1998) (Springer, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandstätter E, Kühberger A, Schneider F. A cognitive-emotional account of the shape of the probability weighting function. J. Behav. Decision Making (2002) 15(2):79–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crowe E, Higgins ET. Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1997) 69(2):117–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haws KL, Dholakia UM, Bearden WO. An assessment of chronic regulatory focus measures. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(5):967–982CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins ET. Beyond pleasure and pain. Amer. Psychologist (1997) 52(12):1280–1300CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins ET. Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Zanna MP, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1998) 30(Elsevier, New York) 1–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins ET. Making a good decision: Value from fit. Amer. Psychologist (2000) 55(11):1217–1230CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins ET, Moscowitz GB, Grant H. Regulatory fit in the goal pursuit process. The Psychology of Goals (2009) (Guilford Press, New York) 505–533Google Scholar
  • Higgins ET, Friedman RS, Harlow RE, Idson LC, Ayduk ON, Taylor A. Achievement orientations from subjective history of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (2001) 31(1):3–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Highhouse S, Paese PW. Problem domain and prospect frame: Choice under opportunity versus threat. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1996) 22(2):124–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Highhouse S, Yüce P. Perspectives, perceptions, and risk-taking behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 65(2):159–167CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Janus K, Zou X. The human side of error management: The role of individuals' motivations and decisions in complex environments. (2009) . Working paper, School of Public Health, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Kahlert J, Frank J. Fuzzy-Logic und Fuzzy-Control (1993) (Vieweg, Braunschweig, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect-theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kluger AN, Yaniv I, Kühberger A. Needs, self-regulation, and risk preference. 15th Annual Convention Soc. Indust. Organ. Psych. (2000) New OrleansGoogle Scholar
  • Kluger AN, Stephan E, Ganzach Y, Hershkovitz M. The effect of regulatory focus on the shape of probability-weighting function: Evidence from a cross-modality matching method. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2004) 95(1):20–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kühberger A. The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1998) 75(1):23–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kühberger A. Framing effects in theory and in practice. Optimization and Operations Research, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) (2002) (EOLSS Publishers, Oxford, UK) . http://www.eolss.netGoogle Scholar
  • Kühberger A, Gradl P. Choice, rating, and ranking: Framing effects with different response modes. J. Behav. Decision Making (2012) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Kühberger A, Huber O. Decision making with mission information: A verbal protocol study. Eur. J. Cognitive Psych. (1998) 10(3):269–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kühberger A, Tanner C. Risky choice framing: Task versions and a comparison of prospect theory and fuzzy-trace theory. J. Behav. Decision Making (2010) 23(3):314–329CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee AY, Aaker JL. Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2004) 86(2):205–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin I, Schneider S, Gaeth G. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1998) 76(2):149–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lisjak M, Molden DC, Lee AY. Primed interference: The cognitive and behavioral costs of incongruity between chronic and primed motivational orientations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2012) 102(5):889–909CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu HH. Impact of regulatory focus on ambiguity aversion. J. Behav. Decision Making (2011) 24(4):412–430CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lockwood P, Jordan CH, Kunda Z. Motivation by positive and negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2002) 83(4):854–864CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lopes LL. Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1987) 20:255–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mano H. Risk-taking, framing effects, and affect. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1994) 57(1):38–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markman AB, Baldwin GC, Maddox WT. The interaction of payoff structure and regulatory focus in classification. Psych. Sci. (2005) 16(11):852–855CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maule AJ, Svenson O, Montgomery H. Positive and negative decision frames: A verbal protocol analyses of the Asian disease problem of Tversky and Kahneman. Process Tracing Approaches to Decision Making (1989) (Wiley, Chichester, UK) 163–180Google Scholar
  • Osborn RN, Jackson DH. Leaders, riverboat gamblers, or purposeful unintended consequences in the management of complex, dangerous technologies. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(4):924–947CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reyna VF, Brainerd CJ. Fuzzy-trace theory and framing-effects in choice: Gist extraction, truncation and conversion. J. Behav. Decision Making (1991) 4(4):249–262CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reyna VF, Brainerd CJ. Dual processes in decision making and developmental neuroscience: A fuzzy-trace model. Developmental Rev. (2011) 31(2–3):180–206Google Scholar
  • Reyna VF, Lloyd FJ, Brainerd CJ, Schneider SL, Shanteau J. Memory, development, and rationality: An integrative theory of judgment and decision making. Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research (2003) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 201–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reyna VF, Estrada SM, DeMarinis JA, Myers RM, Stanisz JM, Mills BA. Neurobiological and memory models of risky decision making in adolescents versus young adults. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (2011) 37(5):1125–1142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rommelfanger HJ, Eickemeier SH. Entscheidungstheorie: Klassische Konzepte und Fuzzy-Erweiterungen (2002) (Springer, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothman AJ, Salovey P. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psych. Bull. (1997) 121(1):3–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scholer AA, Zou X, Fujita K, Stroessner SJ, Higgins ET. When risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2010) 99(2):215–231CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shah J, Higgins ET, Friedman RS. Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1998) 74(2):285–293CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sitkin SB, Pablo AL. Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17(1):9–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Summerville A, Roese NJ. Self-report measures of individual differences in regulatory focus: A cautionary note. J. Res. Personality (2008) 42(1):247–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science (1981) 211(4481):453–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van-Dijk D, Kluger AN. Feedback sign effect on motivation: Is it moderated by regulatory focus? Appl. Psych.: Internat. Rev. (2004) 53(1):113–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang XT. Framing-effects: Dynamics and task domains. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 68(2):145–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang XT. Risk as reproductive variance. Evolution Human Behav. (2002) 23(1):35–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang XT. Self-framing of risky choice. J. Behav. Decision Making (2004) 17(1):1–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiener C. Entscheiden unter unsicherheit: Untersuchungen zum framing-effekt. (2006) . Unpublished dissertation, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  • Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Inform. Control (1965) 8(3):338–353CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao G, Pechmann C. The impact of regulatory focus on adolescents' response to antismoking advertising campaigns. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(4):671–687CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou R, Pham MT. Promotion and prevention across mental accounts: When financial products dictate consumers' investment goals. J. Consumer Res. (2004) 31(1):125–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.