From the Editors—Brainstorming, Multiplicative Utilities, Partial Information on Probabilities or Outcomes, and Regulatory Focus

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1120.0255

References

  • Abbas AE. Decomposing the cross derivatives of a multiattribute utility function into risk attitude and value. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):103–116LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbas AE, Budescu DV, Yu H-T, Haggerty R. A comparison of two probability encoding methods: Fixed probability vs. fixed variable values. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(4):190–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baillon A. Eliciting subjective probabilities through exchangeable events: An advantage and a limitation. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(2):76–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baucells M, Rata C. A survey study of factors influencing risk-taking behavior in real-world decisions under uncertainty. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(3):163–176LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baucells M, Sarin RK. Engineering Happiness: A New Approach for Building a Joyful Life (2012) (University of California Press, Berkeley) Google Scholar
  • Bana e Costa CA, Lourenço JC, Chagas MP, Bana e Costa JC. Development of reusable bid evaluation models for the Portuguese Electric Transmission Company. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(1):22–42LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barker K, Wilson KJ. Decision trees with single and multiple interval-valued objectives. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(4):348–358LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bickel JE. Some determinants of corporate risk aversion. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(4):233–251LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bickel JE. Some comparisons among quadratic, spherical, and logarithmic scoring rules. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(2):49–65LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bickel JE. The relationship between perfect and imperfect information in a two-action risk-sensitive problem. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(3):116–128LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bickel JE. On the decision to take a pitch. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(3):186–193LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bickel JE. Scoring rules and decision analysis education. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):346–357LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bickel JE, Smith JE. Optimal sequential exploration: A binary learning model. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(1):16–32LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bodily S, Pfeifer PE. Darden’s luckiest student: Lessons from a high-stakes risk experiment. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):331–345LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bond SD, Carlson KA, Keeney RL. Improving the generation of decision objectives. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(3):238–255LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bordley RF. Combining the opinions of experts who partition events differently. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):38–46LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bordley RF. Using Bayes’ Rule to update an event’s probabilities based on the outcomes of partially similar events. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(2):117–127LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brothers AJ, Mattigod SV, Strachan DM, Beeman GH, Kearns PK, Papa A, Monti C. Resource-limited multiattribute value analysis of alternatives for immobilizing radioactive liquid process waste stored in Saluggia, Italy. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(2):98–114LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown RV. Working with policy makers on their choices: A decision analyst reminisces. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):14–24LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cantor SB. Clinical applications in the decision analysis literature (Comment on Keefer et al. 2004). Decision Anal. (2004) 1(1):23–25LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clemen RT. Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis (1996) 2nd ed.(Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
  • Clemen RT, Reilly T. Correlations and copulas for decision and risk analysis. Management Sci. (1999) 45(2):208–224LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Delquié P. Interpretation of the risk tolerance coefficient in terms of maximum acceptable loss. Decision Anal. (2008) 5(1):59LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erkin Z, Bailey MD, Maillart LM, Schaefer AJ, Roberts MS. Eliciting patients’ revealed preferences: An inverse Markov decision process approach. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(4):358–365LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ewing B, Baker E. Development of a green building decision support tool: A collaborative process. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(3):172–185LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ewing PL, Tarantino W, Parnell GS. Use of decision analysis in the Army base realignment and closure (BRAC) 2005 military value analysis. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(1):33–49LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gregory R, Fischhoff B, McDaniels T. Acceptable input: Using decision analysis to guide public policy deliberations. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(1):4–16LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harvey CM, Østerdal LP. Cardinal scales for health evaluation. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(3):256–281LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hazen GB. Multiattribute structure for QALYs. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(4):205–216LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hazen GB. Adding extrinsic goals to the quality-adjusted life year model. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(1):3–16LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins ET. Beyond pleasure and pain. Amer. Psychologist (1997) 52(12):1280–1300CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins ET. Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Zanna MP, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1998) (Academic Press, San Diego) 1–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnstone DJ. The parimutuel Kelly probability scoring rule. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(2):66–75LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keefer DL, Kirkwood CW, Corner JL. Perspective on decision analysis applications, 1990–2001. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(1):4–22LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL. Value-Focused Thinking (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Keeney RL. Communicating about decisions: (Comment on Howard 2004). Decision Anal. (2004a) 1(2):82–83LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL. Making better decision makers. Decision Anal. (2004b) 1(4):193–204LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL. Value-focused brainstorming. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(4):303–313LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL, Vernik DA. Analysis of the biological clock decision. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(3):114–135LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keisler JM, Noonan PS. Communicating analytic results: A tutorial for decision consultants. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(3):274–292LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR. Multiattribute and intertemporal preferences, probability and stochastic processes: Models and assessment—From the editor. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(3):165–169LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR. Decisions over time (exploding offers or purchase regret), in game settings (embedded Nash bargaining or adversarial games), and in influence diagrams—From the editor. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(1):1–5LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR, Kophazi KM. From the editors—Copulas, group preferences, multilevel defenders, sharing rewards, and communicating analytics. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(3):213–218LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR, Abbas A, Bickel JE, Bier VM, Budescu DV, Butler JC, Delquié P, et al. From the editors—Probability scoring rules, ambiguity, multiattribute terrorist utility, and sensitivity analysis. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(4):251–255LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kilgour DM, Gerchak Y. Elicitation of probabilities using competitive scoring rules. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(2):108–113LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kirkwood CW. Approximating risk aversion in decision analysis applications. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(1):51–67LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kotz S, van Dorp JR. Generalized diagonal band copulas with two-sided generating densities. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(2):196–214LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kühberger A, Wiener C. Explaining risk attitude in framing tasks by regulatory focus: A verbal protocol analysis and a simulation using fuzzy logic. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(4):359–372LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kurowicka D. Conditionalization of copula based models. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(3):219–230LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lichtendahl KC, Bodily SE. Multiplicative utilities for health and consumption. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(4):314–328LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McCardle KF, Rajaram K, Tang CS. A decision analysis tool for evaluating fundraising tiers. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(1):4–13LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick JRW, Ruggeri F, Soyer R, Keller LR. From the editors—Games and decisions in reliability and risk. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(2):81–85LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mild P, Salo A. Combining a multiattribute value function with an optimization model: An application to dynamic resource allocation for infrastructure maintenance. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(3):139–152LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Montiel LV, Bickel JE. A simulation-based approach to decision making with partial information. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(4):329–347LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Müller P, Berry DA, Grieve AP, Krams M. A Bayesian decision-theoretic dose-finding trial. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(4):197–207LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nosić A, Weber M. How riskily do I invest? The role of risk attitudes, risk perceptions, and overconfidence. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(3):282–301LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pauker SG, Wong JB. The influence of influence diagrams in medicine. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(4):238–244LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reyna VF, Brainerd CJ. Fuzzy-trace theory and framing-effects in choice: Gist extraction, truncation and conversion. J. Behavioral Decision Making (1991) 4(4):249–262CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reyna VF, Brainerd CJ. Dual processes in decision making and developmental neuroscience: A fuzzy-trace model. Developmental Rev. (2011) 31(2–3):180–206Google Scholar
  • Reyna VF, Lloyd FJ, Brainerd CJ, Schneider SL, Shanteau J. Memory, development, and rationality: An integrative theory of judgment and decision making. Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research (2003) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 201245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reyna VF, Estrada SM, DeMarinis JA, Myers RM, Stanisz JM, Mills BA. Neurobiological and memory models of risky decision making in adolescents versus young adults. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, and Cognition (2011) 37(5):1125–1142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schervish MJ, Seidenfeld T, Kadane JB. Proper scoring rules, dominated forecasts, and coherence. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(4):202–221LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sevillano JC, Rios Insua D, Rios J. Adversarial risk analysis: The Somali pirates case. Decision Anal. (2012) 9(2):86–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith JE. Risk sharing, fiduciary duty, and corporate risk attitudes. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(2):114–127LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science (1981) 211(4481):453–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vrecko D, Klos A, Langer T. Impact of presentation format and self-reported risk aversion on revealed skewness preferences. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(2):57–74LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weber M, Zuchel H. How do prior outcomes affect risk attitude? Comparing escalation of commitment and the house-money effect. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(1):30–43LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.