Exploitation of Ambiguous Cues to Infer Terrorist Activity

References

• Atkinson MP, Wein LM. Spatial queueing analysis of an interdiction system to protect cities from a nuclear terrorist attack. Oper. Res. (2008) 56(1):247–254Link, Google Scholar
• Bier VM. Choosing what to protect. Risk Anal. (2007) 27(3):607–620Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunn M, Wier A, Holdren J. Controlling nuclear warheads and materials: A report card and action plan. (2003) . Technical report, Nuclear Threat Initiative, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Chengara A. Indicators of terrorist attacks. Security Res. Rev. (2004) 1(1). Accessed December 13, 2012, http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/SRR/Volume11/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Hausken K, Zhuang J. Governments' and terrorists' defense and attack in a T-period game. Decision Anal. (2011) 8(1):46–70Link, Google Scholar
• Heckerman D. A tutorial on learning with Bayesian networks. (1995) . Technical Report MSR-TR-95-06, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WAGoogle Scholar
• Kass RE, Raftery AE. Bayes factors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1995) 90(430):773–794Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khalsa S. Forecasting Terrorism: Indicators and Proven Analytic Techniques (2004) (The Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MD) Google Scholar
• Krupka JJ. Overcoming ambiguity at the operational level. (2006) . Technical Report ADA463433, Naval War College, Newport, RIGoogle Scholar
• Maurer SM. WMD Terrorism: Science and Policy Choices (2009) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabiner LR. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE (1989) 77(2):257–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabiner LR, Juang B. An introduction to hidden Markov models. ASSP Magazine, IEEE (1986) 3(1):4–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Secure Community Network Seven signs of terrorist activity. (2005) . Accessed December 13, 2012, http://www.scnus.org/page.aspx?id=101218Google Scholar
• Smith A. Detecting terrorist activity: Defining the state's threshold of pain. Australian Defence Force J. (2005) 168:30–44Google Scholar
• Smith BL, Damphousse KR, Roberts P. Pre-incident indicators of terrorist incidents: The identification of behavioral, geographic, and temporal patterns of preparatory conduct. (2006) . Technical Report 214217, U.S. Department of Justice, Rockville, MDGoogle Scholar
• Sticha P, Buede D, Rees RL. Apollo: An analytical tool for predicting a subject's decision making. Proc. Internat. Conf. Intelligence Anal. (2005) McLean, VAGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Army A military guide to terrorism in the twenty-first century. (2007) . Training and Doctrine Command, U.S. Army, Fort Leavenworth, KSGoogle Scholar
• Tu H, Allanach J, Singh S, Pattipati KR, Willett P. The adaptive safety analysis and monitoring system. Proc. of the SPIE: Sensors, and Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence (C3I) Technologies for Homeland Security and Homeland Defense III (2004) 5403:153–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wein LM, Atkinson MP. The last line of defense: Designing radiation detection-interdiction systems to protect cities from a nuclear attack. IEEE Trans. Nuclear Sci. (2007) 54(3):654–669Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wyllie D. 10 years after 9/11: 8 pre-attack indicators of terrorist activity. (2011) . Accessed December 13, 2012, http://www.policeone.com/federal-law-enforcement/articles/3421116-8-pre-attack-indicators-of-terrorist-activity/Google Scholar