Approximating Joint Probability Distributions Given Partial Information

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1120.0261

References

  • Abbas AE. Entropy methods for joint distributions in decision analysis. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2006) 53(1):146–159CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bélisle CJP, Romeijn HE, Smith RL. Hit-and-run algorithms for generating multivariate distributions. Math. Oper. Res. (1993) 18(2):255–266LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsekas DP. Nonlinear Programming (1999) 2nd ed.(Athena Scientific, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Tsitsiklis J. Introduction to Linear Optimization (1997) (Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bickel JE, Smith JE. Optimal sequential exploration: A binary learning model. Decision Anal. (2006) 3(1):16–32LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boyd S, Vandenberghe L. Convex Optimization (2004) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemen RT, Reilly T. Correlations and copulas for decision and risk analysis. Management Sci. (1999) 45(2):208–224LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Delfiner P. Modeling dependencies between geologic risks in multiple targets. SPE Reservoir Eval. Engrg. (2003) 6:57–64SPA 82659-PACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devroye L. Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation (1986) (Springer-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer JS, Farrell W, Bradley P. Utility functions for test performance. Management Sci. (1973) 20(4-Part I):507–519LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ireland CT, Kullback S. Contingency tables with given marginals. Biometrika (1968) 55(1):179–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaynes ET. Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical Rev. (1957) 106(4):620–630Part 1CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaynes ET. Prior probabilities. IEEE Trans. Systems Sci. Cybernetics (1968) 4(3):227–241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keefer DL. Underlying event model for approximating probabilistic dependence among binary events. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2004) 51(2):173–182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korsan RJ, Oliver RM, Smith JQ. Towards better assessments and sensitivity procedures. Influence Diagrams, Belief Nets and Decision Analysis (1990) (Wiley & Sons, New York) 427–454Google Scholar
  • Kullback S, Leibler RA. On information sufficiency. Ann. Math. Statist. (1951) 22(1):79–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lovasz L. Hit-and-run mixes fast. Math. Programming (1998) 86(3):443–461Google Scholar
  • Lowell DG. Sensitivity to relevance in decision analysis. (1994) . Ph.D. thesis, Engineering and Economic Systems, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • MacKenzie GR. Approximately maximum entropy multivariate distributions with specified marginals and pairwise correlations. (1994) . Ph.D. thesis, University of Oregon, EugeneGoogle Scholar
  • McMullen P. The maximum number of faces of a convex polytope. Mathematika (1970) 17(2):179–184CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Montiel LV. Approximations, simulation, and accuracy of multivariate discrete probability distributions in decision analysis. (2012) . Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, AustinGoogle Scholar
  • Montiel LV, Bickel JE. Generating a random collection of discrete joint probability distributions subject to partial information. Methodology Comput. Appl. Probab. (2012a) . ePub ahead of print, May 22, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11009-012-9292-9Google Scholar
  • Montiel LV, Bickel JE. A simulation-based approach to decision making with partial information. Decision Anal. (2012b) 9(4):329–347LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moore LR, Mudford BS. Probabilistic play analysis from geoscience to economics: An example from the Gulf of Mexico. SPE 52955, SPE Hydrocarbon Econom. Evaluation Sympos. (1999) DallasCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moskowitz H, Sarin RK. Improving the consistency of conditional probability assessments for forecasting and decision making. Management Sci. (1983) 29(6):735–749LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sarin RK. A sequential approach to cross-impact analysis. Futures (1978) 10(1):53–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarin RK. An approach for long term forecasting with an application to solar electric energy. Management Sci. (1979) 25(6):543–554LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schmidt BK, Mattheiss TH. The probability that a random polytope is bounded. Math. Oper. Res. (1977) 2(3):292–296LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sklar A. Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publ. Inst. Statist. Univ. Paris (1959) 8:229–231Google Scholar
  • Smith RL. Efficient Monte Carlo procedures for generating points uniformly distributed over bounded regions. Oper. Res. (1984) 32(6):1296–1308LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stabell CB. Alternative approaches to modeling risks in prospects with dependent layers. SPE 63204, SPE Annual Tech. Conf. Exhibition (2000) DallasCrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.