From the Editor—Optimal Betting, Reducing Unnecessary Mammography in Breast Cancer Diagnosis, Product Line Design, and Value of Information

References

• Abbas AE, Bakır NO, Klutke G-A, Sun Z (2013) Effects of risk aversion on the value of information in two-action decision problems. Decision Anal. 10(3):257–275.Link, Google Scholar
• Alagoz O, Chhatwal J, Burnside ES (2013) Optimal policies for reducing unnecessary follow-up mammography exams in breast cancer diagnosis. Decision Anal. 10(3):200–224.Link, Google Scholar
• Baker RD, McHale IG (2013) Optimal betting under parameter uncertainty: Improving the Kelly criterion. Decision Anal. 10(3):189–199.Link, Google Scholar
• Bickel JE (2008) The relationship between perfect and imperfect information in a two-action risk-sensitive problem. Decision Anal. 5(3):116–128.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Mamer JW (2013) Decreasing marginal value of information under symmetric loss. Decision Anal. 10(3):245–256.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Xu L, Whinston A (2010) Managing project failure risk through contingent contracts in procurement auctions. Decision Anal. 7(1):23–39.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen I (2008) Improving time-critical decision making in life-threatening situations: Observations and insights. Decision Anal. 5(2):100–110.Link, Google Scholar
• Delquié P (2008) The value of information and intensity of preference. Decision Anal. 5(3):129–139.Link, Google Scholar
• Eppel T, von Winterfeldt D (2008) Value-of-information analysis for nuclear waste storage tanks. Decision Anal. 5(3):157–167.Link, Google Scholar
• Frazier PI, Powell WB (2010) Paradoxes in learning and the marginal value of information. Decision Anal. 7(4):378–403.Link, Google Scholar
• Grant A, Johnstone D, Kwon OK (2008) Optimal betting strategies for simultaneous games. Decision Anal. 5(1):10–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoffmann S, Fischbeck P, Krupnick A, McWilliams M (2007) Elicitation from large, heterogeneous expert panels: Using multiple uncertainty measures to characterize information quality for decision analysis. Decision Anal. 4(2):91–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnstone DJ (2007) The parimutuel Kelly probability scoring rule. Decision Anal. 4(2):66–75.Link, Google Scholar
• Kadane JB (2011) Partial-Kelly strategies and expected utility: Small-edge asymptotics. Decision Anal. 8(1):4–9.Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Vernik DA (2007) Analysis of the biological clock decision. Decision Anal. 4(3):114–135.Link, Google Scholar
• Keisler J (2004) Value of information in portfolio decision analysis. Decision Anal. 1(3):177–189.Link, Google Scholar
• Kelly JL Jr (1956) A new interpretation of information rate. Inform. Theory, IRE Trans. 2(3):185–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtendahl KC Jr, Bodily SE (2012) Multiplicative utilities for health and consumption. Decision Anal. 9(4):314–328.Link, Google Scholar
• Matheson D, Matheson JE (2005) Describing and valuing interventions that observe or control decision situations. Decision Anal. 2(3):165–181.Link, Google Scholar
• Prange M, Bailey WJ, Couët B, Djikpesse H, Armstrong M, Galli A, Wilkinson D (2008) Valuing future information under uncertainty using polynomial chaos. Decision Anal. 5(3):140–156.Link, Google Scholar
• Shachat J, Swarthout JT (2010) Procurement auctions for differentiated goods. Decision Anal. 7(1):6–22.Link, Google Scholar
• Xiong H, Chen Y-J (2013) Product line design with deliberation costs: A two-stage process. Decision Anal. 10(3):225–244.Link, Google Scholar
• Zan K, Bickel JE (2013) Components of portfolio value of information. Decision Anal. 10(2):171–185.Link, Google Scholar