The Value of Information in Portfolio Problems with Dependent Projects

References

• Accioly R, Chiyshi F (2004) Modeling dependence with copulas: A useful tool for field development decision process. J. Petroleum Sci. Engrg. 44(1–2):83–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjya D, Eidsvik J, Mukerji T (2010) The value of information in spatial decision making. Math. Geosciences 42(2):141–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bickel JE (2008) The relationship between perfect and imperfect information in a two-action risk-sensitive problem. Decision Anal. 5(3):116–128.Link, Google Scholar
• Bickel JE, Smith JE (2006) Optimal sequential exploration: A binary learning model. Decision Anal. 3(1):16–32.Link, Google Scholar
• Bickel JE, Gibson RL, McVay DA, Pickering S, Waggoner J (2008) Quantifying 3D land seismic reliability and value. SPE Reservoir Evaluation Engrg. 11(5):832–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau GE, Pekny JF, Varma VA, Bunch RR (2004) Managing a portfolio of interdependent new product candidates in the pharmaceutical industry. J. Product Innovation Management 21:227–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bratvold R, Bickel JE, Lohne HP (2009) Value of information in the oil and gas industry: Past, present, and future. SPE Reservoir Evaluation Engrg. 12(4):630–638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemen RT, Winkler RL (1985) Limits for the precision and value of information from dependent sources. Oper. Res. 33(2):427–442.Link, Google Scholar
• Cressie N, Wikle CK (2011) Statistics for Spatio-Temporal Data (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Delquié P (2008) The value of information and intensity of preference. Decision Anal. 5(3):129–139.Link, Google Scholar
• Dickinson MW, Thornton AC, Graves S (2001) Technology portfolio management: Optimizing interdependent projects over multiple time periods. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 48(4):518–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eidsvik J, Ellefmo SL (2013) The value of information in mineral exploration within a multi-Gaussian framework. Mathematical Geosciences, ePub ahead of print June 18, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11004-013-9457-2/fulltext.html.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eidsvik J, Bhattacharjya D, Mukerji T (2008) Value of information of seismic amplitude and CSEM resistivity. Geophysics 73(4):R59–R69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fatti LP, Mehrez A, Pachter M (1987) Bounds and properties of the expected value of sample information for a project-selection problem. Naval Res. Logist. 34(1):141–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox GE, Baker NR, Bryant JL (1984) Economic models for R and D project selection in the presence of project interactions. Management Sci. 30(7):890–902.Link, Google Scholar
• Hansen G, Jones M (2008) The value of information in fishery management. Fisheries 33(7):340–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hilton RW (1981) The determinants of information value: Synthesizing some general results. Management Sci. 27(1):57–64.Link, Google Scholar
• Howard R (1966) Information value theory. IEEE Trans. Systems Sci. Cybernetics 2(1):22–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kangas AS (2010) Value of forest information. Eur. J. Forest Res. 129(5):863–874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keisler J (2004a) Technical note: Comparative static analysis of information value in a canonical decision problem. Engrg. Economist 49(4):339–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keisler J (2004b) Value of information in portfolio decision analysis. Decision Anal. 1(3):177–189.Link, Google Scholar
• Killen CP, Kjaer C (2012) Understanding project interdependencies: The role of visual representation, culture and process. Internat. J. Project Management 30(5):554–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Le ND, Zidek JV (2006) Statistical Analysis of Environmental Space-Time Processes (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7(1):77–91.Google Scholar
• Martinelli G, Eidsvik J, Hauge R (2013) Dynamic decision making for graphical models applied to oil exploration. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 230(3):688–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martinelli G, Eidsvik J, Hauge R, Forland MD (2011) Bayesian networks for prospect analysis in the North Sea. AAPG Bull. 95(8):1423–1442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips J, Newman AM, Walls MR (2009) Utilizing a value of information framework to improve ore collection and classification procedures. Engrg. Economist 54:50–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polasky A, Solow A (2001) The value of information in reserve site selection. Biodiversity Conservation 10(7):1051–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raiffa H (1968) Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Salo A, Keisler J, Morton A, eds. (2011) Portfolio Decision Analysis: Methods for Improved Resource Allocation (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santhanam R, Kyparisis GJ (1996) A decision model for interdependent information system project selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 89(2):380–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlaiffer R (1959) Probability and Statistics for Business Decisions (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Trainor-Guitton W, Mukerji T, Knight R (2012) A methodology for quantifying the value of spatial information for dynamic Earth problems. Stochastic Environment. Res. Risk Assessment 27(4):969–983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verma D, Sinha KK (2002) Toward a theory of project interdependencies in high tech R&D environments. J. Oper. Management 20(5):451–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weingartner HM (1966) Capital budgeting of interrelated projects: Survey and synthesis. Management Sci. 12(7):485–516.Link, Google Scholar
• Williams BK, Eaton MJ, Breininger DR (2011) Adaptive resource management and the value of information. Ecological Model. 222(18):3429–3436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zan K, Bickel JE (2013) Components of portfolio value of information. Decision Anal. 10(2):171–185.Link, Google Scholar