Choosing a Strictly Proper Scoring Rule
Published Online:2 Dec 2013https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2013.0280
References
- (2001) Principles of Forecasting (Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Some comparisons among quadratic, spherical, and logarithmic scoring rules. Decision Anal. 4:49–65.Link, Google Scholar
- (1950) Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Rev. 78:1–3.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Loss functions for binary class probability estimation and classification: Structure and applications. Accessed May 2, 2012, http://stat.wharton.upenn.edu/buja/PAPERS/.Google Scholar
- (2013) When is a crowd wise? Decision. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- (2007) Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 102:359–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Local versus global models for classification problems: Fitting models where it matters. Amer. Statistician 57:124–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) The parimutuel Kelly probability scoring rule. Decision Anal. 4:66–75.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Economic interpretation of probabilities estimated by maximum likelihood or score. Management Sci. 57:308–314.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Tailored scoring rules for probabilities. Decision Anal. 8:256–268.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Scoring rules, generalized entropy, and utility maximization. Oper. Res. 56:1146–1157.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Sensitivity to distance and baseline distributions in forecast evaluation. Management Sci. 55:582–590.Link, Google Scholar
- (1972) Scalar and vector partitions of the probability score: Part I. Two-state situation. J. Appl. Meteorology 11:273–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts' Probabilities (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
- (1989) A general method for comparing probability assessors. Ann. Statist. 17:1856–1879.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Axiomatic characterization of the quadratic scoring rule. Experiment. Econom. 1:43–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1970) Measurement of subjective probability. Acta Psych. 34:146–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Wisdom of crowds in the recollection of order information. Bengio Y, Schuurmans D, Lafferty J, Williams CKI, Culotta A, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 22 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 1785–1793.Google Scholar
- (2005) The Wisdom of Crowds (Anchor, New York).Google Scholar
- (2005) Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2013) Forecast aggregation via recalibration. Machine Learn. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- , et al. The aggregative contingent estimation system: Selecting, rewarding, and training experts in a wisdom of crowds approach to forecasting. Pantofaru C, Chernova S, Sorokin A, eds. Proc. 2012 Assoc. Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Spring Sympos. Ser. (AAAI Tech. Rep. SS-12-06) (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 75–76.Google Scholar
- (1971) Probabilistic prediction: Some experimental results. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 66:675–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Scoring rules and the evaluation of probabilities. Test 5:1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Scoring rules. Cochran JJ, ed. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
- (2010) Wisdom of crowds in minimum spanning tree problems. Ohlsson S, Catrambone R, eds. Proc. 32nd Annual Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ), 1840–1845.Google Scholar

