Augmenting Ordinal Methods of Attribute Weight Approximation

References

• Barron FH (1992) Selecting a best multiattribute alternative with partial information about attribute weights. Acta Psychologica 80(1–3):91–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barron FH, Barrett BE (1996a) The efficacy of SMARTER: Simple multi-attribute rating technique extended to ranking. Acta Psychologica 93(1–3):23–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barron FH, Barrett BE (1996b) Decision quality using ranked attribute weights. Management Sci. 42(11):1515–1523.Link, Google Scholar
• Danielson M, Ekenberg L (2007) Computing upper and lower bounds in interval decision trees. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181(2):808–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danielson M, Ekenberg L (2013) Rank ordering methods for multi-criteria decisions. Submitted.Google Scholar
• Danielson M, Ekenberg L, Larsson A (2007a) Distribution of belief in decision trees. Internat. J. Approximate Reasoning 46(2):387–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danielson M, Ekenberg L, Idefeldt J, Larsson A (2007b) Using a software tool for public decision analysis: The case of Nacka Municipality. Decision Anal. 4(2):76–90.Link, Google Scholar
• Dyer JS, Sarin RK (1979) Measurable multiattribute value functions. Oper. Res. 27(4):810–822.Link, Google Scholar
• Katsikopoulos K, Fasolo B (2006) New tools for decision analysis. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics—Part A 36(5):960–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krantz DH, Luce DR, Suppes P, Tversky A (1971) Foundations of Measurement, Vol. 1. (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Stillwell W, Seaver D, Edwards W (1981) A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multiattribute utility decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 28(1):62–77.Crossref, Google Scholar