Scale Dependence and Ranking Intervals in Additive Value Models Under Incomplete Preference Information

References

• Butler J, Jia J, Dyer J (1997) Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 103:531–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chambal SP, Weir JD, Kahraman YR, Gutman AJ (2011) A practical procedure for customizable one-way sensitivity analysis in additive value models. Decision Anal. 8:303–321.Link, Google Scholar
• Dias LC, Climaco JN (2000) Additive aggregation with variable interdependent parameters: The VIP analysis software. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 51:1070–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JS, Sarin RK (1979) Measurable multiattribute value functions. Oper. Res. 27:810–822.Link, Google Scholar
• Eiselt HA, Laporte G (1992) The use of domains in multicriteria decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 61:292–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ewing PL Jr, Tarantino W, Parnell GS (2006) Use of decision analysis in the Army Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) 2005 military value analysis. Decision Anal. 3:33–49.Link, Google Scholar
• French S (1986) Decision Theory: An Introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality (Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Golabi K, Kirkwood CW, Sicherman A (1981) Selecting a portfolio of solar energy projects using multiattribute preference theory. Management Sci. 27:174–189.Link, Google Scholar
• Grushka-Cockayne Y, De Reyck B, Degraeve Z (2008) An integrated decision-making approach for improving European air traffic management. Management Sci. 54:1395–1409.Link, Google Scholar
• Hazen GB (1986) Partial information, dominance, and potential optimality in multiattribute utility theory. Oper. Res. 34:296–310.Link, Google Scholar
• Kämpke T (1996) Sensitivity analysis for assessing preferentially independent order relations. Comput. Oper. Res. 23:1119–1130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kangaspunta J, Liesiö J, Salo A (2012) Cost-efficiency analysis of weapon system portfolios. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223:264–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Kirkwood CW (1997) Strategic Decision Making: Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets (Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
• Kirkwood CW, Sarin RK (1985) Ranking with partial information: A method and an application. Oper. Res. 33:38–48.Link, Google Scholar
• Kleinmuntz CE, Kleinmuntz DN (1999) Strategic approach to allocating capital in healthcare organizations. Healthcare Financial Management 53:52–58.Google Scholar
• Köksalan M, Bykbasaran T, Özpeynirci Ö, Wallenius J (2010) A flexible approach to ranking with an application to MBA programs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 201:470–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Könnölä T, Brummer V, Salo A (2007) Diversity in foresight: Insights from the fostering of innovation ideas. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change 74:608–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lahdelma R, Hokkanen J, Salminen P (1998) SMAA—Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 106:137–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liesiö J (2014) Measurable multiattribute value functions for portfolio decision analysis. Decision Anal. 11:1–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Liesiö J, Mild P, Salo A (2007) Preference programming for robust portfolio modeling and project selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181:1488–1505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liesiö J, Mild P, Salo A (2008) Robust portfolio modeling with incomplete cost information and project interdependencies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 190:679–695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linton JD, Walsh ST, Morabito J (2002) Analysis, ranking and selection of R&D projects in a portfolio. R&D Management 32:139–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu NC, Cheng Y (2005) The academic ranking of world universities. Higher Ed. Europe 30:127–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mustajoki J, Hämäläinen RP, Salo A (2005) Decision support by interval SMART/SWING—Incorporating imprecision in the SMART and SWING methods. Decision Sci. 36:317–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park KS, Kim SH (1997) Tools for interactive decision making with incompletely identified information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 98:111–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips LD, Bana e Costa CA (2007) Transparent prioritisation, budgeting and resource allocation with multi-criteria decision analysis and decision conferencing. Ann. Oper. Res. 154:51–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Punkka A, Salo A (2013) Preference programming with incomplete ordinal information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 231:141–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rios Insua D, French S (1991) A framework for sensitivity analysis in discrete multi-objective decision-making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 54:176–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salo AA, Hämäläinen RP (1992) Preference assessment by imprecise ratio statements. Oper. Res. 40:1053–1061.Link, Google Scholar
• Salo AA, Hämäläinen RP (2001) Preference ratios in multiattribute evaluation (PRIME)—Elicitation and decision procedures under incomplete information. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics A 31:533–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salo AA, Hämäläinen RP (2010) Preference programming—Multicriteria weighting models under incomplete information. Zopounidis C, Pardalos PM, eds. Handbook of Multicriteria Decision Analysis (Springer, New York), 167–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salo AA, Punkka A (2005) Rank inclusion in criteria hierarchies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 163:338–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salo AA, Keisler J, Morton A (2011) An invitation to portfolio decision analysis. Salo A, Keisler J, Morton A, eds. Advances in Portfolio Decision Analysis: Improved Methods for Resource Allocation (Springer, New York), 3–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarabando P, Dias LC (2009) Multiattribute choice with ordinal information: A comparison of different decision rules. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics A 39:545–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stummer C, Heidenberger K (2003) Interactive R&D portfolio analysis with project interdependencies and time profiles of multiple objectives. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 50:175–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vilkkumaa E, Liesiö J, Salo A (2014) Optimal strategies for selecting project portfolios using uncertain value estimates. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223:772–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W (1986) Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Weber M (1987) Decision making with incomplete information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 28:44–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White CC, Sage AP, Scherer WT (1982) Decision support with partially identified parameters. Large Scale Systems 3:177–189.Google Scholar