Decision Performance and Safety Performance: A Value-Focused Thinking Study in the Oil Industry

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2014.0291

References

  • Arvai JL, Gregory R, McDaniels TL (2001) Testing a structured decision approach: Value-focused thinking for deliberative risk communication. Risk Anal. 21(6):1065–1076.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chew DCE (1988) Effective occupational safety activities: Findings in three Asian developing countries. Internat. Labor Rev. 127(1):111–124.Google Scholar
  • Cohen A (1977) Factors in successful occupational safety programs. J. Safety Res. 9(4):168–178.Google Scholar
  • Cohen A, Cleveland RJ (1983) Safety practices in record-holding plant. Professional Safety 28(4):26–33.Google Scholar
  • Corcoran W (2004) Defining and analyzing precursors. Phimister J, Bier V, Kunreuther H, eds. Accident Precursor Analysis and Management: Reducing Technological Risk Through Diligence (National Academy Press, Washington, DC), 79–88.Google Scholar
  • DeJoy DM, Schaffer BS, Wilson MG, Vandenberg RJ, Butts MM (2004) Creating safer workplaces: Assessing the determinants and role of safety climate. J. Safety Res. 35(1):81–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flinn R, Mearns K, O'Connor P, Bryden R (2000) Measuring safety climate: Identifying the common features. Safety Sci. 34(1–3):177–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gregory R, Arvai J, McDaniels T (2001) Value-focused thinking for environmental risk consultations. Böm G, Nerb J, McDaniels T, Spada H, eds. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy (Emerald Publishing, Boston), 249–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hale A (2009) Why safety process indicators? Safety Sci. 47(4):479–480.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrald JR, Mazzuchi TA, Spahn J, Van Dorp JR, Merrick JRW, Shrestha S, Grabowski M (1998) Using system simulation to model the impact of human error in a maritime system. Safety Sci. 30(1–2):235–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Havold JI (2005) Safety-culture in a Norwegian shipping company. J. Safety Res. 36(5):441–458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopkins A (2009) Thinking about process safety indicators. Safety Sci. 47(4):460–465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL (1992) Value Focused Thinking (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Keeney RL (2012) Value-focused brainstorming. Decision Anal. 9(4):303–313.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL, McDaniels TL (1992) Value-focused thinking about strategic decisions at BC Hydro. Interfaces 22(6):94–109.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR, Simon J, Wang Y (2009) Multiple-objective decision analysis involving multiple stakeholders. Oskoorouchi MR, ed. TutORials in Operations Research: Decision Technologies and Applications (INFORMS, Catonsville, MD), 139–155.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Likert RA (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives Psych. 22(140):1–55.Google Scholar
  • Mearns K (2009) From reactive to proactive—Can LPIs delver? Safety Sci. 47(4):491–492.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mearns K, Whitaker SM, Flin R (2001b) Benchmarking safety climate in hazardous environments: A longitudinal, interorganizational approach. Risk Anal. 21(4):771–786.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mearns K, Whitaker SM, Flin R (2003) Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments. Safety Sci. 41(8):641–680.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mearns K, Flin R, Gordon R, Fleming M (2001a) Human and organizational factors in offshore safety. Work Stress 15(2):144–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick JRW, Grabowski M, Ayyalasomayajula P, Harrald JR (2005) Understanding organizational safety using value focused thinking. Risk Anal. 25(4):1029–1041.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick JRW, van Dorp JR, Blackford JP, Shaw GL, Harrald J, Mazzuchi T (2003) A traffic density analysis of proposed ferry service expansion in San Francisco bay using a maritime simulation model. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 81(2):119–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick JRW, van Dorp JR, Mazzuchi T, Harrald JR, Spahn JE, Grabowski M (2002) The Prince William Sound risk assessment. Interfaces 32(6):25–40.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merrick JRW, van Dorp JR, Spahn J, Harrald J, Mazzuchi T, Grabowski M (2000) A systems approach to managing oil transportation risk in Prince William Sound. Systems Engrg. 3(3):128–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parnell GS, Conley HW, Jackson JA, Lehmkuhl LJ, Andrew JM (1998) Foundations 2025: A value model for evaluating future air and space forces. Management Sci. 44(10):1336–1350.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips LD, Bana e Costa CA (2007) Transparent prioritisation, budgeting and resource allocation with multi-criteria decision analysis and decision conferencing. Ann. Oper. Res. 154(1):51–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips LD, Phillips MC (1993) Facilitated work groups: Theory and practice. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 44(6):533–549.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sexton JB, Thomas EJ, Helmreich RL (2000) Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: Cross sectional surveys. British Medical J. 320(7237):745–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shannon HS, Mayr J, Haines T (1997) Overview of the relationship between organizational and workplace factors and injury rates. Safety Sci. 26(3):210–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shannon HS, Walters V, Lewchuk W, Richardson J, Moran LA, Haines TA, Verma D (1996) Workplace organizational correlates of lost time accident rates in manufacturing. Amer. J. Indust. Medicine 29(3):258–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon J, Regnier E, Whitney L (2013) A value-focused approach to energy transformation in the United States Department of Defense. Working paper, Defense Resources Management Institute, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.Google Scholar
  • Simonds RH, Shafai-Sahrai Y (1977) Factors apparently affecting injury frequency in 11 matched pairs of companies. J. Safety Res. 9(3):120–127.Google Scholar
  • Tamuz M (2003) Understanding accident precursors. Phimister JR, Bier VM, Kunreuther H, eds. Accident Precursor Analysis and Management: Reducing Technological Risk Through Diligence (National Academy Press, Washington, DC), 63–78.Google Scholar
  • UK Marine Accident Investigation Branch (2005) An accident, major or serious injury, or hazardous incident? Accessed May 22, 2005, http://www.maib.dft.gov.uk/about_us/index.cfm&e10313.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.