Exploding Offers Can Blow Up in More Than One Way

References

• Andrade EB, Ariely D (2009) The enduring impact of transient emotions on decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 109(1):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Harbaugh W, Vesterlund L (2003) The carrot or the stick: Rewards, punishments, and cooperation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):893–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aquino K, Lewis MU, Bradfield M (1999) Justice constructs, negative affectivity, and employee deviance: A proposed model and empirical test. J. Organ. Behav. 20(7):1073–1091.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M, Zhou J (2013) Search deterrence. MPRA Working Paper 48568, Munich University Library, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Aryee S, Budhwar PS, Chen ZX (2002) Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. J. Organ. Behav. 23(3):267–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearden JN (2001) Ultimatum bargaining experiments: The state of the art. Working paper, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
• Ben-Ner A, Putterman L, Kong F, Magan D (2004) Reciprocity in a two-part dictator game. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 53(3):333–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bensimon HF (1994) Violence in the workplace. Training Development J. 176(4):27–32.Google Scholar
• Boswell WR, Roehling MV, LePine MA, Moynihan LM (2003) Individual job-choice decisions and the impact of job attributes and recruitment practices: A longitudinal field study. Human Resource Management 42(1):23–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Charness G (2000) Hot vs. cold: Sequential responses and preference stability in simple experimental games. Experiment. Econom. 2(3):227–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brosig J, Weimann J, Yang CL (2003) The hot versus cold effect in a simple bargaining experiment. Experiment. Econom. 6(1):75–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Thaler RH (1995) Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners. J. Econom. Perspect. 9(2):209–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll JS, Bazerman MH, Maury R (1988) Negotiator cognitions: A descriptive approach to negotiators' understanding of their opponents. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 41(3):352–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cason TN, Mui V (1997) A laboratory study group polarization in the team dictator game. Econom. J. 107(444):1465–1483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Trost M, Newson JT (1995) Preference for consistency: The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 69(2):318–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Kirchler E, Weichbold A, Gächter S (1998) When social norms overpower competition: Gift exchange in experimental labor markets. J. Labor Econom. 16(2):324–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferguson M, Moye N, Friedman R (2008) The lingering effects of the recruitment experience on the long-term employment relationship. Negotiation Conflict Management Res. 1(3):246–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filipczak B (1993) Armed and dangerous at work. Training 30(7):39–43.Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Haruvy E, Roth AE (2003) Bargaining under a deadline: Evidence from the reverse ultimatum game. Games Econom. Behav. 45(2):347–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Güth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(4):367–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harper D (1990) Spotlight abuse—Save profits. Indust. Distribution 79(3):47–51.Google Scholar
• Hertwig R, Ortmann A (2001) Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behav. Brain Sci. 24(3):383–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herzog SM, Hertwig R (2009) The wisdom of many in one mind: Improving individual judgments with dialectical bootstrapping. Psych. Sci. 20(2):231–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoch SJ (1985) Counterfactual reasoning and accuracy in predicting personal events. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 11(4):719–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horton JJ, Rand DG, Zeckhauser RJ (2011) The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experiment. Econom. 14(3):399–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kittur A, Chi EH, Suh B (2008) Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. Proc. 26th Annual SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 453–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knez MJ, Camerer CF (1995) Outside options and social comparison in three-player ultimatum game experiments. Games Econom. Behav. 10(1):65–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippman SA, Mamer JW (2012) Exploding offers. Decision Anal. 9(1):6–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N (2001) Risk as feelings. Psych. Bull. 127(2):267–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lord CG, Lépper MR, Preston E (1984) Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 47(6):1231–1243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra D (2004) Trust and reciprocity decisions: The differing perspectives of trustors and trusted parties. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 94(2):61–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mason W, Watts DJ (2009) Financial incentives and the “performance of crowds.” Bennett P, Chandrasekar R, Chickering M, Ipeirotis P, Law E, Mityagin A, Provost F, von Ahn L, eds. Proc. ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Human Comput. (ACM, New York),77–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masterson SS, Lewis K, Goldman BM, Taylor MS (2000) Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Acad. Management J. 43(4):738–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oxoby RJ, McLeish KN (2004) Sequential decision and strategy vector methods in ultimatum bargaining: Evidence on the strength of other-regarding behavior. Econom. Lett. 84(3):99–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis PG (2010) Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment Decision Making 5(5):411–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pillutla MM, Murnighan JK (1996) Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 68(3):208–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter COLH, Conlon DE, Barber AE (2005) The dynamics of salary negotiations: Effects on applicants' justice perceptions and recruitment decisions. Internat. J. Conflict Management 15(3):273–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reisberg L (1998) When job offers “explode,” career centers face a quandary. Chronicle Higher Ed. 44(22):A41–A42.Google Scholar
• Roth AE (2008) What have we learned from market design? Econom. J. 118(527):285–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Xing X (1994) Jumping the gun: Imperfections and institutions related to the timing of market transactions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(4):992–1044.Google Scholar
• Rothkopf MH (2007) Decision analysis: The right tool for auctions. Decision Anal. 4(3):167–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Rynes SL, Heneman HG III, Schwab DP (1980) Individual reactions to organizational recruiting: A review. Personnel Psych. 33(3):529–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitt P (2004) On perceptions of fairness: The role of valuations, outside options, and information in ultimatum bargaining games. Experiment. Econom. 7(1):49–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz N, Clore GL (1983) Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(3):513–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selten R (1967) Die strategiemethode zur erforschung des eingeschrankt rationalen verhaltens im rahmen eines oligopolexperiments. Sauermann H, ed. Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung (J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen, Germany), 136–138.Google Scholar
• Skarlicki DP, Folger R (1997) Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. J. Appl. Psych. 82(3):434–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang W, Bearden JN, Tsetlin I (2009) Ultimatum deadlines. Management Sci. 55(8):1423–1437.Link, Google Scholar
• Tepper BJ (2000) Consequences of abusive supervision. Acad. Management J. 43(2):178–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tor A, Bazerman MH (2003) Focusing failure in competitive environments: Explaining decision errors in the Monty Hall game, the acquiring a company game, and multiparty ultimatums. J. Behav. Decision Making 16(5):353–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vohs KD, Baumeister RF, Loewenstein G (2007) Do Emotions Help or Hurt Decision Making? A Hedgefoxian Perspective (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar