Multiattribute Procurement Auctions: Efficiency and Social Welfare in Theory and Practice

References

• Adomavicius G, Gupta A, Sanyal P (2012) Effect of information feedback on the outcomes and dynamics of multisourcing multiattribute procurement auctions. J. Management Inform. Systems 28(4):199–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asker J, Cantillon E (2008) Properties of scoring auctions. RAND J. Econom. 39(1):69–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Levin J (2001) Information and competition in US forest service timber auctions. J. Political Econom. 109(2):375–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ausubel LM, Milgrom P (2006) The lovely but lonely Vickrey auction. Cramton P, Shoham Y, Steinberg R, eds. Combinatorial Auctions (MIT Press, Boston), 17–40.Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Hortacsu A (2005) Are structural estimates of auction models reasonable? Evidence from experimental data. J. Political Econom. 113(4):703–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beil DR, Wein LM (2003) An inverse-optimization-based auction mechanism to support a multiattribute RFQ process. Management Sci. 49(11):1529–1545.Link, Google Scholar
• Bellosta MJ, Kornman S, Vanderpooten D (2008) A unified framework for multiple criteria auction mechanisms. Web Intelligence Agent Systems 6(4):401–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergstrom TC, Varian HR (1985) When do market games have transferable utility? J. Econom. Theory 35(2):222–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bichler M, Kalagnanam J (2005) Configurable offers and winner determination in multi-attribute auctions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 160(2): 380–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bichler M, Kalagnanam J (2006) Software frameworks for advanced procurement auction markets. Comm. ACM 49(12):104–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bichler M, Davenport A, Hohner G, Kalagnanam J (2006) Industrial procurement auctions. Cramton O, Shoham Y, Steinberg R, eds. Combinatorial Auctions (MIT Press, Boston), 593–612.Google Scholar
• Boyne GA (2002) Public and private management: What's the difference? J. Management Stud. 39(1):97–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branco F (1997) The design of multidimensional auctions. RAND J. Econom. 28(1):63–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campo S (2012) Risk aversion and asymmetry in procurement auctions: Identification, estimation and application to construction procurements. J. Econometrics 168(1):96–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Che YK (1993) Design competition through multidimensional auctions. RAND J. Econom. 24(4):668–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen-Ritzo C-H, Harrison TP, Kwasnica AM, Thomas DJ (2005a) Better, faster, cheaper: An experimental analysis of a multiattribute reverse auction mechanism with restricted information feedback. Management Sci. 51(12):1753–1762.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen-Ritzo C-H, Harrison TP, Kwasnica AM, Thomas DJ (2005b) Online supplement to “Better, faster, cheaper: An experimental analysis of a multiattribute reverse auction mechanism with restricted information feedback.” Management Sci. 51(12). https//www.informs.org/content/download/15751/182219/file/Chen-RitzHarrisonKwasnicaThomas_supplement.pdf.Link, Google Scholar
• David E, Azoulay-Schwartz R, Kraus S (2006) Bidding in sealed-bid and English multi-attribute auctions. Decision Support Systems 42(2):527–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• El-Rayes K, Kandil A (2005) Time-cost-quality trade-off analysis for highway construction. J. Construction Engrg. Management 131(4):477–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrin BG, Plank RE (2002) Total cost of ownership models: An exploratory study. J. Supply Chain Management 38(3):18–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Government of Canada (2012) Supply manual: Chapter 10—Cost and profit. Accessed June 24, 2014, https://buyandsell.gc.ca/policy-and-guidelines/supply-manual/section/10.Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Parente ST, Sanyal P (2012) Competitive bidding for health insurance contracts: Lessons from the online HMO auctions. Internat. J. Health Care Finance Econom. 12(4):303–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta D, Snir EM, Chen Y (2014) Contractors' and agency decisions and policy implications in A + B bidding. Production Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print April 23.Google Scholar
• Gwebu KL (2009) Decision support in multi-attribute reverse auctions J. Electronic Commerce Res. 10(4):252–264.Google Scholar
• Hatfield JW, Milgrom P (2005) Matching with contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(4):913–935.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hohner G, Rich J, Ng E, Reid G, Davenport AJ, Kalagnanam JR, Lee HS, An C (2003) Combinatorial and quantity-discount procurement auctions benefit mars, incorporated and its suppliers. Interfaces 33(1):23–35.Link, Google Scholar
• Hurwicz L, Walker M (1990) On the generic nonoptimality of dominant-strategy allocation mechanisms: A general theorem that includes pure exchange economies. Econometrica 58(3): 683–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalagnanam J, Parkes DC (2004) Auctions, bidding and exchange design. Simchi-Levi D, Wu S, Shen Z, eds. Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the E-Business Era (Kluwer, Boston), 143–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kameshwaran S, Narahari Y, Rosa CH, Kulkarni DM, Tew JD (2007) Multiattribute electronic procurement using goal programming. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 179(2):518–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karakaya G, Köksalan M (2011) An interactive approach for multi-attribute auctions. Decision Support Systems 51(2):299–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, von Winterfeldt D (2007) Practical value models. Edwards W, Miles RF Jr, von Winterfeldt D, eds. Advances in Decision Analysis (Cambridge University Press, New York), 232–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kersten GE, Noronha SJ (1998) Rational agents, contract curves, and inefficient compromises. IEEE Systems, Man, Cybernetics 28(3):326–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kersten GE, Vahidov R, Gimon D (2013) Concession-making in multi-attribute auctions and multi-bilateral negotiations: Theory and experiments. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 12(3):166–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Reinschmidt KF (2010) Effects of contractors' risk attitude on competition in construction. J. Construction Engrg. Management 137(4):275–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishna V (2009) Auction Theory, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, Burlington, MA).Google Scholar
• Lewis G, Bajari P (2011) Procurement contracting with time incentives: Theory and evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 126(3):1173–1211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luce RD, Raiffa H (1957) Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Ministry of Economic Development (2010) Guide to measuring procurement savings and benefits. Report, New Zealand Government, Wellington. http://www.business.govt.nz/procurement/pdf-library/agencies/Guidetomeasuringprocurementsavings.pdf.Google Scholar
• Montana Department of Administration (2006) Cost evaluation methods for requests for proposals. Report, General Services Division, Department of Administration, Helena, MT. http://gsd.mt.gov/content/procurement/RFP_Process/Cost_Evaluation.pdf.Google Scholar
• Mumpower JL (1991) The judgment policies of negotiators and the structure of negotiation problems. Management Sci. 37(10): 1304–1324.Link, Google Scholar
• National Energy Technology Laboratory (2011) Quality guide-lines for energy system studies: Cost estimation methodology for NETL assessments of power plant performance. Report DOE/NETL-2011/1455, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC. http://www.netl.doe.gov/File%20Library/research/energy %20analysis/publications/QGESSNETLCostEstMethod.pdf.Google Scholar
• Parkes DC, Kalagnanam J (2005) Models for iterative multiattribute procurement auctions. Management Sci. 51(3):435–451.Link, Google Scholar
• Parsons S, Rodriguez-Aguilar JA, Klein M (2011) Auctions and bidding: A guide for computer scientists. ACM Comput. Surveys 43(2):10:11–10:59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pham L, Zaitsev A, Steiner R, Teich JE (2013) NegotiAuction: An experimental study. Decision Support Systems 56:300–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raiffa H (1982) The Art and Science of Negotiation: How to Resolve Conflicts and Get the Best Out of Bargaining (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Raiffa H, Richardson J, Metcalfe D (2003) Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Rothkopf MH (2007) Decision analysis: The right tool for auctions. Decision Anal. 4(3):167–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Sandholm TW (2007) Expressive commerce and its application to sourcing: How we conducted $35 billion of generalized combinatorial auctions. AI Magazine 28(3):45–58.Google Scholar
• Simon J, Melese F (2011) A multiattribute sealed-bid procurement auction with multiple budgets for government vendor selection. Decision Anal. 8(3):170–179.Link, Google Scholar
• Strecker S (2010) Information revelation in multiattribute English auctions: A laboratory study. Decision Support Systems 49(3):272–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teich JE, Wallenius H, Wallenius J, Zaitsev A (2006) A multi-attribute e-auction mechanism for procurement: Theoretical foundations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 175(1):90–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian HR (2010) Intermediate Economics: A Modern Approach, 8th ed. (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Wellman MP (2005) System and method for matching multi-attribute auction bids. U.S. Patent 6952682 B1, filed July 2, and issued October 4, 2005.Google Scholar
• Young HP, ed. (1991) Negotiation Analysis (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).Google Scholar