An Empirical Examination of Multiple Objective Risk Attitudes

References

• Bauer KW Jr (1997) Personal communication.Google Scholar
• Clemen RT, Reilly T (2001) Making Hard Decisions with DecisionTools (Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA).Google Scholar
• Dees RA, Nestler ST, Kewley R (2013) WholeSoldier Performance appraisal to support mentoring and personnel decisions. Decision Anal. 10(1):82–97.Link, Google Scholar
• Doyle MP (1998) A value-focused thinking approach to offensive information operations. Master’s thesis AFIT/GOR/ENS/98M-10, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.Google Scholar
• Doyle MP (2000) Personal communication.Google Scholar
• Dyer JS, Sarin RK (1979) Measurable multiattribute value functions. Oper. Res. 27(4):810–822.Link, Google Scholar
• Dyer JS, Sarin RK (1982) Relative risk aversion. Management Sci. 28(8):875–886.Link, Google Scholar
• Hershey JC, Schoemaker PJH (1985) Probability versus certainty equivalent methods in utility measurement: Are they equivalent? Management Sci. 31(10):1213–1231.Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL (1992) Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preference and Value Tradeoffs (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller LR (1985) An empirical investigation of relative risk aversion. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics SMC-15(4):475–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkwood CW (1997) Strategic Decision Making: Multicriteria Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets (Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
• Klimack WK (2002) Robustness of multiple objective decision analysis functions. Doctoral dissertation DTIC ADA402483, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.Google Scholar