Use of Insurance Against a Small Loss as an Incentive Strategy
Published Online:10 Apr 2015https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2015.0314
References
- (2012) Risk preferences are not time preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3357–3376.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1971) Essays on the Theory of Risk Bearing (Markham Publishing, Chicago).Google Scholar
- (2006) Small- and large-stakes risk aversion: Implications of concavity calibration for decision theory. Games Econom. Behav. 56(1):45–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Extending the Theory to Meet the Practice of Insurance (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) On the intuition of rank-dependent utility. J. Risk Uncertainty 23(3):281–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) Inferring risk tolerances from deductibles in insurance contracts. Geneva Papers Risk Insurance 6(20):48–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Expectations as endowments: Evidence on reference-dependent preferences from exchange and valuation. Quart. J. Econom. 126(4):1879–1907.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The impact of alternative incentive schemes on completion of health risk assessments. Amer. J. Health Promotion 26(3):184–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Lottery-based versus fixed incentives to increase clinicians’ response to surveys. Health Services Res. 46(5):1663–1674.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experiment. Econom. 14(3):399–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Insurance Decision-Making and Market Behavior (Now Publishers, Hanover, MA).Google Scholar
- (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Workplace wellness programs study: Final report. Report RR-254, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
- (1966) The selection of an optimal deductible for a given insurance policy. J. Bus. 39(1):35–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3):497–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(4):323–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Risk aversion and expected utility theory: A calibration theorem. Econometrica 68(5):1281–1292.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Extended warranties: Should you take the bait? Investopedia (November 28), http://www.investopedia.com/articles/pf/07/warranties.asp.Google Scholar
- (2010) (Over)insuring modest risks. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 2(4):177–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008a) Financial incentive based approaches for weight loss: A randomized trial. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 300(22): 2631–2637.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008b) A test of financial incentives to improve warfarin adherence. BMC Health Services Res. 8(December):272.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- Warranty Week (2005) Extended warranty administrators: While auto and PC manufacturers have the top spots, insurance companies and third party administrators grab the bulk of the pie. (January 19), http://www.warrantyweek.com/archive/ww20050119.html.Google Scholar
- Warranty Week (2007) Extended warranty solution. (July 25), http://www.warrantyweek.com/archive/ww20070725.html.Google Scholar
- (2002) Defending expected utility theory. J. Econom. Perspect. 16(2):227–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Stochastic models for binary discrete choice under risk: A critical primer and econometric comparison. Cox JC, Harrison GW, eds. Risk Aversion in Experiments, Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 12 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 197–292.Crossref, Google Scholar

