Probabilistic Warnings in National Security Crises: Pearl Harbor Revisited

References

• Baum LE, Eagon JA (1967) An inequality with applications to statistical estimation for probabilistic functions of Markov processes and to a model for ecology. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73(3):360–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum LE, Petrie T (1966) Statistical inference for probabilistic functions of finite state Markov chains. Ann. Math. Stat. 37(6): 1554–1563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belden TG (1977) Indications, warning, and crisis operations. Internat. Stud. Quart. 21(1):181–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellman RE (1953) An introduction to the theory of dynamic programming. RAND Corp., Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Blum DM (2012) Probabilistic models for warning of national security crises. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Management Sci. and Eng., Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Clark R (2009) Intelligence Analysis: A Target-Centric Approach, 3rd ed. (CQ Press, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Koller D, Friedman N (2009) Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Defense Strategies Institute (2014) Big data for intelligence symposium. Accessed November 4, 2015, http://bigdatasymposium.dsigroup.org/2014-home.Google Scholar
• Edwards W, Phillips LD, Hays WL, Goodman BC (1968) Probabilistic information processing systems: Design and evaluation. IEEE Trans. Sys. Sci. Cybernetics 4(3):248–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geiger D, Verma T, Pearl J (1990) d-separation: From theorems to algorithms. Proc. 5th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Windsor, Ontario, 139–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grabo C (1994) Strategic warning: The problem of timing. Central Intelligence Agency Historical Review Program. Accessed November 4, 2015, https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/kent-csi/vol16no2/html/v16i2a07p_0001.htm.Google Scholar
• Heuer Jr RJ (1981) Applications of Bayesian inference in political intelligence. Hopple GW, Kuhlman JA, eds. Expert-Generated Data: Applications in International Affairs (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Howard RA (1960) Dynamic Programming and Markov Processes (Technology Press of MIT, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Howard RA (1989) Knowledge maps. Management Sci. 35(8): 903–922.Link, Google Scholar
• Howard RA, Matheson JE (2005) Influence diagrams. Decision Anal. 2(3):127–143.Link, Google Scholar
• Lakats LM, Paté-Cornell ME (2004) Organizational warnings and system safety: A probabilistic analysis. IEEE Trans. Eng. Management 51(2):183–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matheson JE, Abbas AE (2005) Utility transversality: A value-based approach. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. 13(5–6):229–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy KP (2001) The Bayes Net Toolbox for Matlab. Wegman EJ, Braverman A, Goodman AF, Smyth P, eds. Proc. 33rd Sympos. Interface Comput. Sci. Statist., Costa Mesa, CA (Interface Foundation of North America, Fairfax Station, VA).Google Scholar
• Paté-Cornell ME (1986) Warning systems in risk management. Risk Anal. 6(2):223–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paté-Cornell ME, Fischbeck PS (1995) Probabilistic interpretation of command and control signals: Bayesian updating of the probability of nuclear attack. Reliability Eng. System Safety 47(1): 27–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peterson WW, Birdsall TG, Fox W (1954) The theory of signal detectability. IRE Trans. Professional Group Info. Theory 4(4): 171–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shachter RD (1998) Bayes-ball: The rational pastime (for determining irrelevance and requisite information in belief networks and influence diagrams). Cooper GF, Moral S, eds. Proc. 14th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Madison, WI (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco), 480–487.Google Scholar
• Schelling TC (1960) The Strategy of Conflict (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Swets JA, Birdwall TG (1956) The human use of information, III: Decision-making in signal detection and Recognition situations involving multiple alternatives. IRE Trans. Information Theory 2(3):138–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• United States Asst. Chief of Staff, G-2, U.S. Army (1946) Ex. 33, Memorandum for Chief of Staff, WPD, July 11, 1941. Hearings before the Joint Committee on the Investigation of the Pearl Harbor Attack (hereafter Hearings), Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• United States Army (2006) Field manual 2-22.3 Human intelligence collector operations. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• United States Chief of Naval Operations (1946) Cable 242005, November 24, 1941. Pearl Harbor attack: Hearings, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• United States Chief of Staff, U.S. Army, and U.S. Chief of Naval Operations, U.S. Navy (1946) Ex. 17, Memorandum for the President, November 27, 1941. Hearings, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• United States Commandant, 14th Naval District (1994) Traffic intelligence summaries, July-December, 1941, SRMN-012. Parker F, ed. Pearl Harbor Revisited: United States Navy Communication Intelligence, 1924–1941 (Center for Cryptologic History, Ft. Meade, MD).Google Scholar
• United States Commandant, 16th Naval District (1946) Ex. 8, Cable 261331, November 26, 1941. Hearings, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• United States Commander, Hawaiian Air Force (1946) Ex. 13, Study of air situation in Hawaii, August 20, 1941. Hearings, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• United States Commander, Naval Base Defense Air Force and United States Commander Hawaiian Air Force (1946) Joint estimate covering Joint Army and Navy air action in the event of sudden hostile action against Oahu or fleet units in the Hawaiian area, March 28, 1941. Hearings, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• United States Commander U.S. Pacific Fleet (1946) Ex. 44, Pacific Fleet Confidential Letter 2CL-41 (Revised), October 14, 1941. Hearings, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• United States Joint Board (1946) Ex. 16, Minutes of meeting, November 3, 1941. Hearings, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• United States Office of Naval Intelligence (1946a) Ex. 149, Fortnightly summary of current national intelligence, Serial no. 25, December 1, 1941. Hearings, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• United States Office of Naval Intelligence (1946b) Ex. 149, Memorandum, Japanese fleet locations, December 1, 1941. Hearings, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• United States Office of Naval Intelligence (1946c) Ex. 8, Naval message, no subject, November 24, 1941. Hearings, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West M, Harrison J (1989) Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models (Springer Verlag, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter R (1962) Pearl Harbor: Warning and Decision (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Zlotnick J (1972) Bayes’ theorem for intelligence analysis. Stud. Intelligence 16(2):43–52.Google Scholar