Validating the Contribution-Weighted Model: Robustness and Cost-Benefit Analyses
Published Online:18 Apr 2016https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2016.0329
References
- (2016) Distilling the wisdom of crowds: Prediction markets vs. prediction polls. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print April 22, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2374.Google Scholar
- (1987) Two methods of reducing overconfidence. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 39(1):133–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Two reasons to make aggregated probabilities more extreme. Decision Anal. 11(2):133–145.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Why are experts correlated? Decomposing correlations between judges. Psychometrika 74(3):531–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Identifying expertise to extract the wisdom of crowds. Management Sci. 61(2):267–280.Link, Google Scholar
- (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational Psych. Measurement 20(1):37–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Learning from experience. Armstrong JS, ed. Handbook of Forecasting Principles (Kluwer, Norwell, MA), 484–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1975) Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 8 (Academic Press, New York), 1–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) The wisdom of ignorant crowds: Predicting sport outcomes by mere recognition. Judgment Decision Making 6(1):58–72.Google Scholar
- (1988) Expertise and decision under uncertainty: Performance and process. Chi MTH, Glaser R, Farr MJ, eds. The Nature of Expertise (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 209–228.Google Scholar
- (2014) Trimmed opinion pools and the crowd’s calibration problem. Management Sci. 60(2):63–475.Link, Google Scholar
- (1973) On the psychology of prediction. Psych. Rev. 80(4):237–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Probabilistic coherence weighting for optimizing expert forecasts. Decision Anal. 10(4):305–326.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) The Delphi method in forecasting financial markets—An experimental study. Internat. J. Forecasting 30(2):313–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1980) Reasons for confidence. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Learning Memory 6(2):107–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Judgmental decomposition: When does it work? Internat. J. Forecasting 10(4):495–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Markets as a structural solution to knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 120(2):154–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Instruction in information structuring improves Bayesian judgment in intelligence analysts. Frontiers Psych. 6:387.Google Scholar
- (2014) The wisdom of selected crowds. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 107(2):276–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Psychological strategies for winning geopolitical forecasting tournaments. Psych. Sci. 25(5):1106–1115.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Identifying and cultivating “superforecasters” as a method of improving probabilistic predictions. Perspectives Psych. Sci. 10(3):267–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Uncertain Judgments: Eliciting Experts’ Probabilities (Wiley, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) The potential influence of small group processes on guideline development. J. Evaluation Clinical Practice 7(2):165–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) The reliability of subjective probability assessments obtained through decomposition. Management Sci. 34(2):186–199.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) The impact of user expertise on geographic risk assessment under uncertain conditions. Cartography Geographic Inform. Sci. 36(1):29–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. Internat. J. Forecasting 15(4):353–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Accuracy of judgmental forecasts: A comparison. Omega 20(3):353–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Combining multiple probability predictions using a simple logit model. Internat. J. Forecasting 30(2):344–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Intuitive biases in choice vs. estimation: Implications for the wisdom of crowds. J. Consumer Res. 38(1):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Error and attack tolerance of collective problem solving: The DARPA Shredder Challenge. EPJ Data Sci. 3(13):1–27.Google Scholar
- (2014) Evaluating probabilistic forecasts with Bayesian signal detection models. Risk Anal. 34(3):435–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Forecasting tournaments: Tools for increasing transparency and improving the quality of debate. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 23(4):290–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Forecast aggregation via recalibration. Machine Learn. 95(3):261–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Evaluating and combining subjective probability estimates. J. Behavioral Decision Making 10(3):243–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Acad. Management J. 36(3):590–602.Crossref, Google Scholar

