Goals as Reference Points: Empirical Evidence from a Virtual Reward System

References

• Allen EJ, Dechow PM, Pope DG, Wu G (2016) Reference-dependent preferences: Evidence from marathon runners. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print April 20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2417.Google Scholar
• Allison PD, Waterman RP (2002) Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models. Sociol. Methodology 32(1):247–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson A, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Leskovec J (2013) Steering user behavior with badges. Schwabe D, Almeida V, Glaser H, eds. Proc. 22nd Internat. Conf. World Wide Web, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 95–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antin J, Churchill EF (2011) Badges in social media: A social psychological perspective. Gamification Workshop Proc., Vancouver, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
• Bandura A, Schunk DH (1981) Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 41(3):586–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Thaler RH (1995) Myopic loss-aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quart. J. Econom. 110(1):75–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Botterill CB (1977) Goal setting and performance on an endurance task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
• Blohm I, Leimeister JM (2013) Gamification. Design of IT-based enhancing services for motivational support and behavioral change. Bus. Inform. Systems Engrg. 5(4):275–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordley RF, LiCalzi ML (2000) Decision analysis using targets instead of utility functions. Decisions Econom. Finance 23(1):53–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryan JF, Locke EA (1967) Goal setting as a means of increasing motivation. J. Appl. Psych. 51(3):274–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burke B (2014) Gamify: How Gamification Motivates People to Do Extraordinary Things (Bibliomotion, Inc., Brookline, MA).Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Babcock L, Loewenstein G, Thaler R (1997) Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: One day at a time. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):407–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2013) Regression Analysis of Count Data (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castagnoli E, LiCalzi ML (1996) Expected utility without utility. Theory Decision 41(3):281–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, LiCalzi ML (2001) Learning to make risk neutral choices in a symmetric world. Math. Soc. Sci. 41(1):19–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denny P (2013) The effect of virtual achievements on student engagement. Mackay WE, ed. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 763–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deterding S, Khaled R, Nacke LE, Dixon D (2011) Gamification: Toward a definition. Gamification Workshop Proc., Vancouver, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
• Drèze X, Nunes JC (2009) Feeling superior: The impact of loyalty program structure on consumers’ perceptions of status. J. Consumer Res. 35(6):890–905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garland H (1982) Goal levels and task performance: A compelling replication of some compelling results. J. Appl. Psych. 67(2):245–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gartner (2011) Gartner says by 2015, more than 50 percent of organizations that manage innovation processes will gamify those processes (April 12), http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/1629214.Google Scholar
• Goes P, Guo C, Lin M (2016) Do incentive hierarchies induce user effort? Evidence from an online knowledge exchange. Working paper, University of Arizona, Tucson.Link, Google Scholar
• Guimaraes P (2008) The fixed effects negative binomial model revisited. Econom. Lett. 99(1):63–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamari J (2013) Transforming homo economicus into homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 12(4):236–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamari J, Koivisto J, Sarsa H (2014) Does gamification work?—A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Sprague RH Jr, ed. Proc. 47th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (Conference Publishing Services, Los Alamitos, CA), 3025–3034.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman JA, Hall BH, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica 52(4):909–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Larrick RP, Wu G (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):79–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong W, Chan FKY, Thong JYL, Chasalow LC, Dhillon G (2014) A framework and guidelines for context-specific theorizing in information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):111–136.Link, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen JB, Frederiksen L (2006) Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer controlled music instruments. Organ. Sci. 17(1):45–63.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kankanhalli A, Tan B, Wei KK (2005) Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 29(1):113–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keisler JM, Bordley RF (2014) Project management decisions with uncertain targets. Decision Anal. 12(1):15–28.Link, Google Scholar
• Kollock P (1999) The economies of online cooperation. Smith M, Kollock P, eds. Communities in Cyberspace (Routledge, New York), 220–242.Google Scholar
• Kramer RM (1989) Windows of vulnerability or cognitive illusions? Cognitive processes and the nuclear arms race. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 25(1):79–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar J (2013) Gamification at work: Designing engaging business software. Marcus A, ed. Proc. Second Internat. Conf. Design, User Experience and Usability, Las Vegas, NV (Springer, Berlin), 528–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LaPorte RE, Nath R (1976) Role of performance goals in prose learning. J. Educational Psych. 68(3):260–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latham GP, Locke EA (1991) Self-regulation through goal setting. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 50(2):212–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Tirole J (2002) Some simple economics of open source. J. Industrial Econom. 50(2):197–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt SD, List JA (2007) What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? J. Econom. Perspectives 21(2):153–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Z, Huang KW, Cavusoglu H (2012) Quantifying the impact of badges on user engagement in online Q&A communities. George JF, ed. Proc. 2012 Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Orlando, Florida (Association of Information Systems, Atlanta).Google Scholar
• LiCalzi M (1999) A language for the construction of preferences under uncertainty. Revista Real Academia Ciencias Exactas, Fìsicas Naturales 93(4):439–450.Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Bryan JF (1969) The directing function of goals in task performance. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 4(1):35–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP (1990) A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. Amer. Psych. 57(9):705–717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markle A, Wu G, White RJ, Sackett AM (2015) Goals as reference points in marathon running: A novel test of reference dependence. Research Paper 2523510, Gabelli School of Business, Fordham University, New York.Google Scholar
• McNeil BJ, Pauker SG, Tversky A (1988) On the framing of medical decisions. Bell DE, Raiffa H, Tversky A, eds. Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 562–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mento AJ, Steel RP, Karren RJ (1987) A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966–1984. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 39(1):52–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mutter T, Kundisch D (2014a) Don’t take away my status!–Evidence from the restructuring of a virtual reward system. Comput. Networks 75(November):477–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mutter T, Kundisch D (2014b) Behavioral mechanisms prompted by badges: The goal-gradient hypothesis. Myers MD, Straub WS, eds. Proc. 2014 Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Auckland, New Zealand (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 4037–4053.Google Scholar
• Nemeroff WF, Cosentino J (1979) Utilizing feedback and goal setting to increase performance appraisal interviewer skills of managers. Acad. Management J. 22(3):566–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ness RG, Patton RW (1979) The effect of beliefs on maximum weight-lifting performance. Cognitive Therapy Res. 3(2):205–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odean T (1998) Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? J. Finance 53(5):1775–1798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penenberg AL (2013) Play at Work: How Games Inspire Breakthrough Thinking (Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
• Quattrone GA, Tversky A (1988) Contrasting rational and psychological analyses of political choice. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 82(3):719–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Harper FM, Drenner S, Terveen L, Kiesler S, Riedl J, Kraut RE (2012) Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. MIS Quart. 36(3):841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothkopf EZ, Billington MJ (1979) Goal-guided learning from text: Inferring a descriptive processing model from inspection times and eye movements. J. Educational Psych. 71(3):310–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sales SM (1970) Some effects on role overload and role underload. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 5(6):592–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevenson MK, Kanfer FH, Higgins JM (1984) Effects of goal specificity and time cues on pain tolerance. Cognitive Therapy Res. 8(4):415–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH (1985) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. 4(3):199–214.Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasko M, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. 29(1):35–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wu G, Heath C, Larrick R (2008) A prospect theory model of goal behavior. Working paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Wyer RS, Srull TK, Gordon SE, Hartwick J (1982) Effect of processing objectives on the recall of prose material. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 43(4):674–688.Crossref, Google Scholar