Directed Expected Utility Networks

References

• Abbas AE (2009) From Bayes’ nets to utility nets. Goggans PM, Chan C-Y, eds. Proc. 29th Internat. Workshop Bayesian Inference Maximum Entropy Methods Sci. Engrg. (American Institute of Physics, Oxford, MS), 3–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abbas AE (2010) General decompositions of multiattribute utility functions with partial utility independence. J. Multicriteria Decision Anal. 17(1–2):37–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abbas AE (2011) The multiattribute utility tree. Decision Anal. 8(3):180–205.Link, Google Scholar
• Abbas AE, Howard RA (2005) Attribute dominance utility. Decision Anal. 2(4):185–206.Link, Google Scholar
• Barons M, Wright SK, Smith JQ (2016) Eliciting probabilistic judgements for integrating decision support systems. Technical report No. 16-05, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.Google Scholar
• Bickel G, Nord M, Price C, Hamilton W, Cook J (2000) Guide to measuring household food security. Technical report, Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Braziunas D, Boutilier C (2005) Local utility elicitation in GAI models. Proc. 21st Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (AUAI Press, Edinburgh), 42–49.Google Scholar
• Cowell RG, Dawid AP, Lauritzen SL, Spiegelhalter DJ (2007) Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Dawid AP (1979) Conditional independence in statistical theory. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Series B 41(1):1–31.Google Scholar
• Engel Y, Wellman MP (2008) CUI networks: A graphical representation for conditional utility independence. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. 31(1):83–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishburn PC (1967) Interdependence and additivity in multivariate, unidimensional expected utility theory. Internat. Econom. Rev. 8(3):335–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giang PH, Shenoy PP (2005) Two axiomatic approaches to decision making using possibility theory. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 162(2):450–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gómez M (2004) Real-world applications of influence diagrams. Gámez JA, Cerdan AS, Moral S, eds. Advances in Bayesian Networks (Springer, Berlin), 161–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonzales C, Perny P (2004) GAI networks for utility elicitation. Proc. 9th Internat. Conf. Principles Knowledge Representation Reasoning (AAAI Press, Whistler, British Columbia), 224–233.Google Scholar
• Heckerman D, Mamdani A, Wellman MP (1995) Real-world applications of Bayesian networks. Comm. Assoc. Computing Machinery 38(3):24–26.Google Scholar
• Hong DH, Choi CH (2000) Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets Systems 114(1):103–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard RA, Matheson JE (2005) Influence diagrams. Decision Anal. 2(3):127–143.Link, Google Scholar
• Jensen F, Jensen FV, Dittmer SL (1994) From influence diagrams to junction trees. Proc. 10th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence, Seattle (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco),367–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL (1974) Multiplicative utility functions. Oper. Res. 22(1):22–34.Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kitchen S, Tanner E, Brown V, Colin P, Crawford C, Deardon L, Greaves E, Purdon S (2013) Evaluation of the free school meals pilot: Impact report. Technical report DFERR227, Department for Education, Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
• La Mura P, Shoham Y (1999) Expected utility networks. Proc. 15th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco), 366–373.Google Scholar
• Lauritzen SL (1996) Graphical Models (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonelli M, Smith JQ (2015) Bayesian decision support for complex systems with many distributed experts. Ann. Oper. Res. 235(1):517–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonelli M, Riccomagno E, Smith JQ (2017) Using computer algebra to symbolically evaluate discrete influence diagrams. Technical report No. 15-07, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.Google Scholar
• Nielsen TD, Jensen FV (2009) Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Los Altos, CA).Google Scholar
• Shachter RD (1986) Evaluating influence diagrams. Oper. Res. 34(6):871–882.Link, Google Scholar
• Smets P (2002) Decision making in a context where uncertainty is represented by belief functions. Srivastava RP, Mock TJ, eds. Belief Functions in Business Decisions (Springer, Heidelberg),17–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith JQ (2010) Bayesian Decision Analysis: Principles and Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith JQ, Thwaites P (2008) Influence diagrams. Melnick EL, Everitt BS, eds. Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Analysis and Assessment (Wiley, Chichester, UK), 897–910.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith JQ, Barons MJ, Leonelli M (2015a) Coherent frameworks for statistical inference serving integrating decision support systems. Technical report No. 15-10, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.Google Scholar
• Smith JQ, Barons MJ, Leonelli M (2015b) Decision focused inference on networked probabilistic systems: With applications to food security. Amer. Statist. Assoc. Joint Statist. Meeting, Seattle, 3220–3233.Google Scholar
• Sullivant S, Talaska K, Draisma J (2010) Trek separation for Gaussian graphical models. Ann. Statist. 38(3):1665–1685.Crossref, Google Scholar