Optimal Group Size in Joint Liability Contracts
Published Online:23 Aug 2017https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2017.0349
References
- (2006) Group size and social ties in microfinance institutions. Econom. Inquiry 44(4):614–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) The role of group size in group lending. J. Development Econom. 115(July):140–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Selection into and across credit contracts: Theory and field research. J. Econometrics 136(2):665–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Optimal (partial) group liability in microfinance lending. J. Development Econom. 121(July):201–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Networks in finance. Kleindorfer P, Wind J, eds. Network-based Strategies and Competencies (Wharton School Publishing, Wharton, NJ), 367–382.Google Scholar
- (1999) On the design of a credit agreement with peer monitoring. J. Development Econom. 60(1):79–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Peer group formation in an adverse selection model. Econom. J. 110(465):632–643.Google Scholar
- (2013) Repayment incentives and the distribution of gains from group lending. J. Development Econom. 105(November):131–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Human and financial capital for microenterprise development: Evidence from a field and lab experiment. Management Sci. 61(4):707–722.Link, Google Scholar
- (1995) Group lending, repayment incentives and social collateral. J. Development Econom. 46(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Group lending and individual lending with strategic default. J. Development Econom. 91(2):348–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Group lending with endogenous group size. Econom. Lett. 117(3):556–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Edyficar and Mibanco: The emergence of M&A in microfinance. Working paper 315-030, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
- (2004) Monitoring by delegates or by peers? Joint liability loans under moral hazard. Working paper, Hunter College, New York.Google Scholar
- (2008) Returns to capital in microenterprises: Evidence from a field experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 123(4):1329–1372.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) The economic returns to social interaction: Experimental evidence from microfinance. Rev. Econom. Stud. 80(4):1459–1483.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Contract structure, risk-sharing, and investment choice. Econometrica 81(3):883–939.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Microfinance decision making: A field study of prosocial lending. J. Marketing Res. 48(November):130–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Group lending, local information and peer selection. J. Development Econom. 60(1):27–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Screening by the company you keep: Joint liability lending and the peer selection effect. Econom. J. 110(465):601–631.Google Scholar
- (2012) Group lending with correlated project outcomes. Econom. Lett. 117(2):445–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Los microcréditos: Una oportunidad de inclusión laboral. Labóral 4(23):30–32.Google Scholar
- (2003) Collusion and group lending with adverse selection. J. Development Econom. 70(2):329–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Is microfinance an effective strategy to reach the millennium development goals? Report No. 24, Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP), Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (2003) A challenge to the orthodoxy concerning microfinance and poverty reduction. J. Microfinance 5(2):7–42.Google Scholar
- (2009) Credit accessibility and corporate social responsibility in financial institutions: The case of microfinance. Bus. Ethics: Eur. Rev. 18(4):349–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Microcredit no panacea for poor women. Accessed July 21, 2017, http://www.gdrc.org/icm/wind/micro.html.Google Scholar
- (1990) Peer monitoring and credit markets. World Bank Econom. Rev. 4(3):351–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Here today, gone tomorrow: Can dynamic incentives make microfinance more flexible? J. Development Econom. 80(1):84–105.Crossref, Google Scholar

