When to Release Feedback in a Dynamic Tournament

References

• Aoyagi M (2010) Information feedback in a dynamic tournament. Games Econom. Behav. 70(2):242–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beer M (1987) Performance appraisals. Lorsch J, ed. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ),286–301.Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Ehsani S, Mostagir M (2018) Designing dynamic contests. Oper. Res. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Bonatti A, Horner J (2011) Collaborating. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):632–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonatti A, Horner J (2017) Career concerns with exponential learning. Theoret. Econom. 1(12):425–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budd C, Harris C, Vickers J (1993) A model of the evolution of duopoly: Does the asymmetry between firms tend to increase or decrease? Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):543–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao D (2014) Racing under uncertainty: Boundary value problem approach. J. Econom. Theory 151:508–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casas-Arce P, Martnez-Jerez FA (2009) Relative performance compensation, contests, and dynamic incentives. Management Sci. 55(8):1306–1320.Link, Google Scholar
• Casella G, Berger R (2002) Statistical Inference, 2nd ed. (Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA).Google Scholar
• Charness G, Masclet D, Villeval MC (2014) The dark side of competition for status. Management Sci. 60(1):38–55.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Ham SH, Lim N (2011) Designing multiperson tournaments with asymmetric contestants: An experimental study. Management Sci. 57(5):864–883.Link, Google Scholar
• Choi JP (1991) Dynamic R&D competition under hazard rate uncertainty. RAND J. Econom. 22(4):596–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cvitanić J, Georgiadis G (2016) Achieving efficiency in dynamic contribution games. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 8(4):309–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ederer F (2010) Feedback and motivation in dynamic tournaments. J. Econom. Management Strategy 19(3):733–769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaba A, Tsetlin I, Winkler RL (2004) Modifying variability and correlations in winner-take-all contests. Oper. Res. 52(3):384–395.Link, Google Scholar
• Gershkov A, Perry M (2009) Tournaments with midterm reviews. Games Econom. Behav. 66(1):162–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbs M (1991) An economic approach to process in pay and performance appraisals. Working paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Goltsman M, Mukherjee A (2011) Interim performance feedback in multistage tournaments: The optimality of partial disclosure. J. Labor Econom. 29(2):229–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green J, Stokey N (1983) A comparison of tournaments and contracts. J. Political Econom. 91(3):349–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halac M, Kartik N, Liu Q (2017) Contests for experimentation. J. Political Econom. 125(5):1523–1569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris C, Vickers J (1987) Racing with uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. 54(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison JM (2013) Brownian Models of Performance and Control (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnstone DJ (2007) The parimutuel Kelly probability scoring rule. Decision Anal. 4(2):66–75.Link, Google Scholar
• Kessomg SG (2007) Strategic complementarity in the dynamic private provision of a discrete public good. J. Public Econom. Theory 9(4):699–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilgour DM, Gerchak Y (2004) Elicitation of probabilities using competitive scoring rules. Decision Anal. 1(2):108–113.Link, Google Scholar
• Konrad KA (2009) Strategy and Dynamics in Contests (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhnen CM, Tymula A (2012) Feedback, self-esteem, and performance in organizations. Management Sci. 58(1):94–113.Link, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liden RC, Mitchell TR (1985) Reactions to feedback: The role of attributions. Acad. Management J. 28(2):291–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malueg DA, Tsutsui SO (1997) Dynamic R&D competition with learning. RAND J. Econom. 28(4):751–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marinovic I (2015) The credibility of performance feedback in tournaments. J. Econom. Management Strategy 24(1):165–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moldovanu B, Sela A (2001) The optimal allocation of prizes in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):542–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moscarini G, Smith L (2011) Optimal dynamic contests. Working paper, Yale University.Google Scholar
• Murphy KR, Cleveland JN (1991) Performance Appraisal: An Organizational Perspective (Allyn & Bacon, Boston).Google Scholar
• Orrison A, Schotter A, Weigelt K (2004) Multiperson tournaments: An experimental examination. Management Sci. 50(2):268–279.Link, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Farh J-L (1989) Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 44(1):45–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridlon R, Shin J (2013) Favoring the winner or loser in repeated contests. Marketing Sci. 32(5):768–785.Link, Google Scholar
• Singh N, Wittman D (1988) Economic contests with incomplete information and optimal contest design. Management Sci. 34(4):528–540.Link, Google Scholar
• Yildirim H (2005) Contests with multiple rounds. Games Econom. Behav. 51(1):213–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wang R (2009) The role of information revelation in elimination contests. Econom. J. 119(536):613–641.Google Scholar