Eliciting Public Risk Preferences in Emergency Situations

References

• Abdellaoui M, Kemel E (2014) Eliciting prospect theory when consequences are measured in time units: “Time is not money.” Management Sci. 60(7):1844–1859.Link, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, Paraschiv C (2007) Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement. Management Sci. 53(10):1659–1674.Link, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Baillon A, Placido L, Wakker P (2011) The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):695–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, l’Haridon O, Paraschiv C (2013) Is there one unifying concept of utility? An experimental comparison of utility under risk and utility over time. Management Sci. 59(9):2153–2169.Link, Google Scholar
• Abellan-Perpiñan JM, Bleichrodt H, Pinto-Prades JL (2009) The predictive validity of prospect theory versus expected utility in health utility measurement. J. Health Econom. 28(6):1039–1047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allais M (1953) Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’Ecole Américaine (The behavior of rational man facing risk: Criticism of the postulates and axioms of the American School). Econometrica 21(4):503–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Harrison GW, Morton IL, Rutstrom EE (2008) Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica 76(3):583–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Sprenger C (2012) Estimating time preferences from convex budgets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3333–3356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barseghyan L, Prince J, Teitelbaum J (2011) Are risk preferences stable across contexts? Evidence from insurance data. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):591–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Heukamp F (2012) Probability and time trade-off. Management Sci. 58(4):831–842.Link, Google Scholar
• Bian WQ, Keller LR (1999a) Chinese and Americans agree on what is fair, but disagree on what is best in societal decisions affecting health and safety risks. Risk Anal. 19(3):439–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bian WQ, Keller LR (1999b) Patterns of fairness judgments in North America and the People’s Republic of China. J. Consumer Psych. 8(3):301–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL (2000) A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Sci. 46(11):1485–1496.Link, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Quiggin J (1997) Characterizing QALYs under a general rank dependent utility model. J. Risk Uncertainty 15(2):151–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheung S (2015) Comment on “risk preferences are not time preferences”: On the elicitation of time preference under conditions of risk. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(7):2242–2260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darley J, Latane B (1968) Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 8(4):377–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickson MA, Lennon SJ, Montalto CP, Shen D, Zhang L (2004) Chinese consumer market segments for foreign apparel products. J. Consumer Marketing 21(5):301–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dillon RL, Tinsley C, Burns W (2014) Near-misses and future disaster preparedness. Risk Anal. 34(10):1907–1922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epper T, Fehr-Duda H (2015) Comment on “risk preferences are not time preferences”: Balancing on a budget line. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(7):2261–2271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fennema H, van Assen M (1998) Measuring the utility of losses by means of the tradeoff method. J. Risk Uncertainty 17(3):277–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fennema H, Wakker P (1997) Original and cumulative prospect theory: A discussion of empirical differences. J. Behav. Decision Making 10(1):53–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fetherstonhaugh D, Slovic P, Johnson S, Friedrich J (1997) Insensitivity to the value of human life: A study of psychophysical numbing. J. Risk Uncertainty 14(3):283–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B (1983) Predicting frames. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 9(1):103–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishburn PC, Sarin RK (1991) Dispersive equity and social risk. Management Sci. 37(7):751–769.Link, Google Scholar
• Fishburn PC, Straffin PD (1989) Equity considerations in public risks evaluation. Oper. Res. 37(2):229–239.Link, Google Scholar
• Fredrik A, Lyttkens CH (1999) Preferences for equity in health behind a veil of ignorance. Health Econom. 8(5):369–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonzalez R, Wu G (1999) On the shape of the probability weighting. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):129–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene J, Haidt J (2002) How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends Cognitive Sci. 6(12):517–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hammerton M, Jones-Lee MW, Abbott V (1982) Equity and public risk: Some empirical results. Oper. Res. 30(1):203–207.Link, Google Scholar
• Hammitt JK (2013) Admissible utility functions for health, longevity, and wealth: Integrating monetary and life-year measures. J. Risk Uncertainty 47(3):311–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertwig R, Barron G, Weber EU, Erev I (2004) Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psych. Sci. 15(8):534–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janis IL, Mann L (1977) Emergency decision making: A theoretical analysis of responses to disaster warnings. J. Human Stress 3(2):35–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jenni KE, Loewenstein G (1997) Explaining the identifiable victim effect. J. Risk Uncertainty 14(3):235–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Just M, Carpenter P (1992) A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psych. Rev. 99(1):122–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL (1980a) Equity and public risk. Oper. Res. 28(3):527–534.Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL (1980b) Evaluating alternatives involving potential fatalities. Oper. Res. 28(1):188–205.Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Winkler RL (1985) Evaluating decision strategies for equity of public risks. Oper. Res. 33(5):955–970.Link, Google Scholar
• Keller LR, Sarin RK (1988) Equity in social risk: Some empirical observations. Risk Anal. 8(1):135–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kühberger A (1998) The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 75(1):23–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leclerc F, Schmitt B, Dube L (1995) Waiting time and decision making: Is time like money? J. Consumer Res. 22(1):110–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonhardt JM, Keller LR, Pechmann C (2011) Avoiding the risk of responsibility by seeking uncertainty: Responsibility aversion and preference for indirect agency when choosing for others. J. Consumer Psych. 21(4):405–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein S, Slovic P (1971) Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. J. Experiment. Psych. 89(1):46–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGraw AP, Shafir E, Todorov A (2010) Valuing money and things: Why a $20 item can be worth more and less than $20. Management Sci. 56(5):816–830.Link, Google Scholar
• Miao B, Zhong S (2015) Comment on “risk preferences are not time preferences”: Separating risk and time preference. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(7):2272–2286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nord E (1995) The person-trade-off approach to valuing health care programs. Medical Decision Making 15(3):201–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3):497–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D, Loewenstein G (1991) Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Sci. 37(7):770–786.Link, Google Scholar
• Quiggin J (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(4):323–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarin RK (1985) Measuring equity in public risk. Oper. Res. 33(1):210–217.Link, Google Scholar
• Savage LJ (1954) The Foundations of Statistics (John Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Small DA, Loewenstein G (2003) Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability. J. Risk Uncertainty 26(1):5–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small DA, Loewenstein G, Slovic P (2007) Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102(2):143–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith CA, Ellsworth PC (1985) Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 48(4):813–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith J, Keeney R (2005) Your money or your life: A prescriptive model for health, safety, and consumption decisions. Management Sci. 51(9):1309–1325.Link, Google Scholar
• Spencer BH (2014) The cold-war origins of the value of statistical life. J. Econom. Perspect. 28(4):213–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starmer C (2000) Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. J. Econom. Literature 38(2):332–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tengs TO, Adams ME, Pliskin JS, Safran DG, Siegel JE, Weinstein MC, Graham JD (1995) Five hundred life saving interventions and their cost effectiveness. Risk Anal. 15(3):369–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE (2003) Thinking the unthinkable: Sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends Cognitive Sci. 7(7):320–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Fox CR (1995) Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psych. Rev. 102(2):269–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Cumulative prospect theory: An analysis of decision under uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ungemach C, Chater N, Stewart N (2009) Are probabilities overweighted or underweighted when rare outcomes are experienced (rarely)? Psych. Sci. 20(4):473–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Wagenaar WA, Keren G, Lichtenstein S (1988) Islanders and hostages: Deep and surface structures of decision problems. Acta Psychologica 67(2):175–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker P, Deneffe D (1996) Eliciting von Neumann–Morgenstern utilities when probabilities are distorted or unknown. Management Sci. 42(8):1131–1150.Link, Google Scholar
• Wakker P, Erev I, Weber E (1994) Comonotonic independence: The critical test between classical and rank-dependent utility theories. J. Risk Uncertainty 9(3):195–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg M, Beattie J (1997) Consequences of regret aversion 2: Additional evidence for effects of feedback on decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 72(1):63–78.Crossref, Google Scholar