Decision Analysis and Political Processes

References

• Abelson J, Gauvin FP (2006) Assessing the impacts of public participation: Concepts, evidence and policy implication. Research Report P06, Canadian Policy Research Networks, Ottawa.Google Scholar
• Abelson J, Forest PG, Eyles J, Smith P, Martin E, Gauvin FP (2003) Deliberations about deliberative methods: Issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Soc. Sci. Med. 57(2):239–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyris N, French S (2017) Nuclear emergency decision support: A behavioural OR perspective. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 262(1):180–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyris N, Morton A, Figueira JR (2014) CUT: A multicriteria approach for concavifiable preferences. Oper. Res. 62(3):633–642.Link, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1963) Social Choice and Individual Values (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Aven T (2003) Foundation of Risk Analysis: A Knowledge and Decision-Oriented Perspective (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bacharach M (1975) Group decisions in the face of differences of opinion. Management Sci. 22(2):182–191.Link, Google Scholar
• Bana e Costa C, da Silva FN, Vansnick J-C (2001) Conflict dissolution in the public sector: A case-study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 130(2):388–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bana e Costa C, Corrêa ÉC, De Corte J-M, Vansnick J-C (2002) Facilitating bid evaluation in public call for tenders: A socio-technical approach. Omega 30(3):227–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayley C (2008) Public participation. Melnick EL, Everitt BS, eds. Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Analysis and Assessment (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 1383–1391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayley C, French S (2008) Designing a participatory process for stakeholder involvement in a societal decision. Group Decision Negotiation 17(3):179–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayley C, French S (2011) Public participation: Comparing approaches. J. Risk Res. 14(2):241–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bazerman MH (2006) Managerial Decision Making (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Bedford T, French S, Atherton E (2005) Supporting ALARP decision-making by cost benefit analysis and multi-attribute utility theory. J. Risk Res. 8(3):207–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beierle T, Cayford J (2002) Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Bell D, Keeney R, Raiffa H, eds. (1977) Conflicting Objectives in Decision, International Series on Applied Systems Analysis 1 (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Bellaby P (2003) Communication and miscommunication of risk: Understanding UK parents’ attitudes to combined MMR vaccination. BMJ 327(7417):725–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belton V, Stewart TJ (2002) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach (Kluwer Academic Press, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belton V, Ackermann F, Shepherd I (1997) Integrated support from problem structuring through to alternative evaluation using COPE and V-I-S-A. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. 6(3):115–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett PG, Calman KC, Curtis S, Fischbacher-Smith D, eds. (2010) Risk Communication and Public Health, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berridge V (2012) The rise, fall, and revival of recovery in drug policy. Lancet 379(9810):22–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Box GEP, Taio GC (1973) Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Briggs RO, de Veerde G-J, Nunamaker JF (2003) Collaboration engineering with ThinkLets to pursue sustained success with GSS. J. Management Inform. Syst. 19(4):31–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office (2011) Communicating Risk Guidance (UK Government, Cabinet Office, London).Google Scholar
• Campbell P (2011) Understanding the receivers and the reception of science's uncertain messages. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A 369(1956):4891–4912.Google Scholar
• Chaiken S, Liberman A, Eagly AH (1989) Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. Uleman JS, Bargh JA, eds. Unintended Thought (Guilford, New York), 212–252.Google Scholar
• Chalmers AF (2013) What Is This Thing Called Science? (Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis).Google Scholar
• Coakes E, Willis D, Clarke S, eds. (2002) Knowledge Management in the SocioTechnical World, Computer Supported Co-operative Work (Springer-Verlag, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conti S, O’Hagan A (2010) Bayesian emulation of complex multi-output and dynamic computer models. J. Statist. Planning Inference 140(3):640–651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cortner HJ (2000) Making science relevant to environmental policy. Environ. Sci. Policy 3(1):21–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Finetti B (1974) Theory of Probability, Vol. I (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• De Finetti B (1975) Theory of Probability, Vol. II (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• DeGroot MH (1970) Optimal Statistical Decisions (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• De Neufville R, Keeney R (1972) Systems evaluation through decision analysis: Mexico City Airport. J. Systems Engrg. 3(1):34–50.Google Scholar
• De Vreede G-J (2006) Collaboration engineering: Current directions and future opportunities. Seifert S, Weinhardt C, eds. Internat. Conf. Group Decision Negotiation (Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe), 15–22.Google Scholar
• Dias L, Morton A, Quigley J, eds. (2017) Elicitation of Preferences and Uncertainty: Processes and Procedures (Springer, Cham, Switzerland).Google Scholar
• Eden C, Radford J, eds. (1990) Tackling Strategic Problems: The Role of Group Decision Support (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Edwards W (1954) The theory of decision making. Psych. Bull. 51(4):380–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards W, Miles RF Jr, von Winterfeldt D, eds. (2007) Advances in Decision Analysis: From Foundations to Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority (2012) When Food Is Cooking Up a Storm: Proven Recipes for Risk Communications (European Food Safety Authority, Parma, Italy).Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B (2008) Risk perception and communication. Detels R, Beaglehole R, Lansang MA, Gulliford M, eds. Oxford Textbook of Public Health, 5th ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 940–952.Google Scholar
• French S (1984) Interactive multi-objective programming: Its aims, applications and demands. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 35(9):827–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• French S (1986) Decision Theory: An Introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality (Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• French S (2003) Modelling, making inferences and making decisions: The roles of sensitivity analysis. TOP 11(2):229–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• French S (2011) Aggregating expert judgement. Revista Real Acad. Ciencias Exactas Fisicas Naturales Ser. A 105(1):181–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• French S (2012) Expert judgment, meta-analysis, and participatory risk analysis. Decision Anal. 9(2):119–127.Link, Google Scholar
• French S (2014) Axiomatising the Bayesian paradigm in parallel small worlds. Working paper, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.Google Scholar
• French S (2015) Cynefin: Uncertainty, small worlds and scenarios. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 66(10):1635–1645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• French S, Rios Insua D (2000) Statistical Decision Theory (Arnold, London).Google Scholar
• French S, Maule AJ, Mythen G (2005) Soft modelling in risk communication and management: Examples in handling food risk. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 56(8):879–888.Crossref, Google Scholar
• French S, Maule AJ, Papamichail KN (2009) Decision Behaviour, Analysis and Support (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• French S, Rios Insua D, Ruggeri F (2007) e-Participation and decision analysis. Decision Anal. 4(4):1–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB (2013) Bayesian Data Analysis (Chapman & Hall, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbard A (1973) Manipulation of voting schemes: A general result. Econometrica 41(4):587–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert MG (2017) Group and societal decision making: An exploration of modelling paradigms applied to nuclear facility siting. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.Google Scholar
• Greco S, Knowles JD, Miettinen K, Zitzler E (2012) Learning in multiobjective optimization (Dagstuhl Seminar 12041). Dagstuhl Rep. 2(1):50–99.Google Scholar
• Gregory RS, Fischhoff B, McDaniels T (2005) Acceptable input: Using decision analysis to guide public policy deliberations. Decision Anal. 2(1):4–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Hammond PJ (1991) Interpersonal comparisons of utility: Why and how they are and should be made. Elster J, Roemer JE, eds. Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 200–254.Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC (1978) Bayesian decision theory and utilitarian ethics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 68(2):223–228.Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC (1979) Bayesian decision theory, rule utilitarianism, and Arrow’s impossibility theorem. Theory Decision 11(3):289–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartung J, Knapp J, Sinha BK (2008) Statistical Meta-Analysis with Applications (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodge JK, Klima RE (2005) The Mathematics of Voting and Elections: A Hands-On Approach (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogarth RM (1980) Judgement and Choice (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Allen Lane, London).Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1974) Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, eds. (1982) Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL (1992) Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Keeney RL (2013) Foundations for group decision analysis. Decision Anal. 10(2):103–120.Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Gregory RS (2005) Selecting attributes to measure the achievement of objectives. Oper. Res. 53(1):1–11.Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Nair K (1977) Nuclear siting using decision analysis. Energy Policy 5(3):223–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Nau R (2011) A theorem for Bayesian group decisions. J. Risk Uncertainty 43(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Kelly FS (1978) Arrow Impossibility Theorems (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Losa FB, Belton V (2006) Combining MCDA and conflict analysis: An exploratory application of an integrated approach. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57(5):510–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marttunen M, Lienert J, Belton V (2017) Structuring problems for multi-criteria decision analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 263(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maule AJ (2008) Risk communication and organizations. Starbuck W, Hodgkinson G, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Decision Making (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 518–533.Google Scholar
• McDaniels T, Small MJ, eds. (2004) Risk Analysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterisation of the Field (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• McMurray R, Cheater FM, Weighall A, Nelson C, Schweiger M, Mukherjee S (2004) Managing controversy through consultation: A qualitative study of communication and trust around MMR vaccination decisions. British J. General Practice 54(504):520–525.Google Scholar
• Montibeller G, Gummer H, Tumidei D (2006) Combining scenario planning and multi-criteria decision analysis in practice. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. 14(1–3):5–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morton A, Airoldi M, Phillips LD (2009) Nuclear risk management on stage: A decision analysis perspective on the UK’s Committee on Radioactive Waste Management. Risk Anal. 29(5):764–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunamaker JF, Dennis AR, George JE, Valacich JS, Vogel DR (1991) Electronic meeting systems to support group work: Theory and practice at Arizona. Comm. ACM. 34(7):40–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nutt DJ, King LA, Phillips LD (2010) Drug harms in the UK: A multicriteria decision analysis. Lancet 376(9752):1558–1565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Hagan A, Buck CE, Daneshkhah A, Eiser R, Garthwaite PH, Jenkinson D, Oakley JE, Rakow T (2006) Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts’ Probabilities (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen D (2015) Collaborative decision making. Decision Anal. 12(1):29–45.Link, Google Scholar
• Palenchar MJ, Heath RL (2007) Strategic risk communication: Adding value to society. Public Relations Rev. 33(2):120–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papamichail KN, French S (2013) 25 years of MCDA in nuclear emergency management. IMA J. Management Math. 24(4):481–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips LD (2007) Decision conferencing. Edwards W, Miles RF, von Winterfeldt D, eds. Advances in Decision Analysis: From Foundations to Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 375–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pidgeon N, Rogers-Hayden T (2007) Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering’s inquiry. Public Understanding Sci. 16(3):345–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raiffa H (1968) Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choice Under Uncertainty (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Raiffa H, Richardson J, Metcalfe D (2002) Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ram C, Montibeller G, Morton A (2011) Extending the use of scenario planning and MCDA for the evaluation of strategy. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 62(8):817–829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramsey FP (1926) Truth and probability. Braithwaite RB, ed. The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays (Harcourt, Brace and Co., New York), 156–198.Google Scholar
• Renn O (1998) The role of risk communication and public dialogue for improving risk management. Risk Decision Policy 3(1):3–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Renn O (2008) Risk Governance (Earthscan, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rios Insua D (1990) Sensitivity Analysis in Multi-Objective Decision Making (Springer Verlag, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rios Insua D, French S, eds. (2010) e-Democracy: A Group Decision and Negotiation Perspective, Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rios Insua D, Ruggeri F (2000) Robust Bayesian Analysis (Springer-Verlag, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rios Insua D, Salewicz A, Müller P, Bielza C (1997) Bayesian methods in reservoir operations: The Zambezi River case. French S, Smith JQ, eds. The Practice of Bayesian Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 107–130.Google Scholar
• Risk and Regulation Advisory Council (2009) A Practical Guide to Public Risk Communication: The Five Essentials of Good Practice (Risk and Regulation Advisory Council, London).Google Scholar
• Rogers S, Girolami M (2015) A First Course in Machine Learning (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
• Rosenhead J, Mingers J, eds. (2001) Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2000) Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Sci. Tech. Human Values 25(1):3–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite MA (1975) Strategy-proofness and Arrow’s conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions. J. Econom. Theory 10(2):187–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoemaker P (1995) Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Rev. 36(2):25–40.Google Scholar
• Schroeder MJ, Lambert JH (2011) Scenario-based multiple criteria analysis for infrastructure policy impacts and planning. J. Risk Res. 14(2):191–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen A (1970) Interpersonal aggregation and partial comparability. Econometrica 38(3):393–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw D, Franco A, Westcombe M (2006) Problem structuring methods: New directions in a problematic world. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57(7):757–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw D, Franco A, Westcombe M (2007) Taking problem structuring methods forward. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 58(5):545–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siebert J, von Winterfeldt D, Richard J (2016) Identifying and structuring the objectives of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and its followers. Decision Anal. 13(1):26–50.Link, Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter DJ, Riesch H (2011) Don’t know, can’t know: Embracing deeper uncertainties when analysing risks. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Ser. A 369(1956):4730–4750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steffek J, Kissling C (2007) Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance: A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? (Palgrave Macmillan, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevens A, Ritter A (2013) How can and do empirical studies influence drug policies? Narratives and complexity in the use of evidence in policy making. Drugs Ed. Prevention Policy 20(3):169–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart TJ, French S, Rios J (2010) Scenario-based multi-criteria decision analysis. Antunes CH, ed. Proc. 25th Mini-EURO Conf. Uncertainty Robustness Planning Decision Making (URPDM 2010), Coimbra, Portugal.Google Scholar
• Stewart TJ, French S, Rios J (2013) Integration of multicriteria decision analysis and scenario planning. Omega 41(4):679–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor AD (2005) Social Choice and the Mathematics of Manipulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tredinnick L (2006) Web 2.0 and business: A pointer to the intranets of the future? Bus. Inform. Rev. 23(4):228–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2002) Communicating in a Crisis: Risk Communication: Guidelines for Public Officials (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC).Crossref, Google Scholar
• van der Heijden K (1996) Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Williamson D, Goldstein M (2012) Bayesian policy support for adaptive strategies using computer models for complex physical systems. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 63(8):1021–1033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright G, Goodwin P (1999) Future-focused thinking: Combining scenario planning with decision analysis. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. 8(6):311–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zionts S, Wallenius J (1976) An interactive programming method for solving the multiple criteria problem. Management Sci. 22(6):652–663.Link, Google Scholar