Two-Stage Invest–Defend Game: Balancing Strategic and Operational Decisions
Published Online:7 Mar 2019https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2018.0377
References
- (2014) Infrastructure security games. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 239(2):469–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Optimal allocation of resources for defense of simple series and parallel systems from determined adversaries. Haimes YY, Moser DA, Stakhiv EZ, eds. Proc. Engrg. Foundation Conf. Risk-Based Decisionmaking Water Resources X (American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA), 59–76.Google Scholar
- (2008) Optimal resource allocation for defense of targets based on differing measures of attractiveness. Risk Anal. 28(3):763–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Game theory in supply chain analysis. Simchi-Levi D, Wu SD, Shen ZM, eds. Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis (Springer, Boston), 13–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1952) A social equilibrium existence theorem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 38(10):886–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Vulnerability Assessment of Physical Protection Systems (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
- (2014) Incorporating attack-type uncertainty into network protection. IEEE Trans. Inform. Forensics Security 9(8):1278–1287.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) How to deal with an intelligent adversary. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 90:352–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Security games with unknown adversarial strategies. IEEE Trans. Cybernetics 46(10):2291–2299.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Confronting the risks of terrorism: Making the right decisions. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 86(2):129–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Nature plays with dice–terrorists do not: Allocating resources to counter strategic versus probabilistic risks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 192(1):198–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017). Modeling a multi target attacker–defender game with budget constraints. Decision Anal. 14(2):87–107.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Deterring the smuggling of nuclear weapons in container freight through detection and retaliation. Decision Anal. 8(2):88–102.Link, Google Scholar
- (2004) Mathematical methods in combatting terrorism. Risk Anal. 24(4):985–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Probabilistic risk analysis and game theory. Risk Anal. 22(1):17–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Income, interdependence, and substitution effects affecting incentives for security investment. J. Accounting Public Policy 25(6):629–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Strategic defense and attack of complex networks. Internat. J. Performability Engrg. 5(1):13–30.Google Scholar
- (2010) Defense and attack of complex and dependent systems. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 95(1):29–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Defending against multiple different attackers. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 211(2):370–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) On the effectiveness of security countermeasures for critical infrastructures. Risk Anal. 36(4):711–726.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Parallel systems with different types of defense resource expenditure under two sequential attacks. Proc. Institution Mech. Engineers Part O: J. Risk Reliability 223(1):71–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Review of systems defense and attack models. Internat. J. Performability Engrg. 8(4):355–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Governments’ and terrorists’ defense and attack in a t-period game. Decision Anal. 8(1):46–70.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Defending against terrorism, natural disaster, and all hazards. Bier VM, Azaiez MN, eds. Game Theoretic Risk Analysis of Security Threats (Springer, New York), 65–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Technology adoption, accumulation, and competition in multi-period attacker-defender games. Military Oper. Res. 18(2):33–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal. 1(1):11–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1951) Nonlinear programming. Neyman J, ed. Proc. 2nd Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. Probab. (University of California Press, Berkeley), 481–492.Google Scholar
- (2009) Optimal distribution of constrained resources in bi-contest detection-impact game. Internat. J. Performability Engrg. 5(1):45–54.Google Scholar
- (2009) Intelligence and impact contests in systems with redundancy, false targets, and partial protection. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 94(12):1927–1941.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Defence and attack of systems with variable attacker system structure detection probability. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 61(1):124–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012a) Individual versus overarching protection against strategic attacks. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 63(7):969–981.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012b) Parallel systems under two sequential attacks with imperfect detection of the first attack outcome. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 63(11):1545–1555.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012c) Resource distribution in multiple attacks with imperfect detection of the attack outcome. Risk Anal. 32(2):304–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Risk analysis for critical asset protection. Risk Anal. 27(5):1265–1281.Crossref, Google Scholar
- National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (2016) Annex of statistical information: Country reports on terrorism 2016. Report, Bureau of Counterterrorism and Countering Violent Extremism, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC. Google Scholar
- (2012) Robust allocation of a defensive budget considering an attacker’s private information. Risk Anal. 32(5):930–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Fusion of intelligence information: A Bayesian approach. Risk Anal. 22(3):445–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Probabilistic modeling of terrorist threats: A systems analysis approach to setting priorities among countermeasures. Military Oper. Res. 7(4):5–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Defending simple series and parallel systems with imperfect false targets. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 95(6):679–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Deployed armor protection: the application of a game theoretic model for security at the Los Angeles International Airport. Padgham L, Parkes D, Muller JP, eds. Proc. 7th Internat. Joint Conf. Autonomous Agents Multiagent Systems (Indust. Track) (International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC), 125–132.Google Scholar
- (2007) Allocating defensive resources with private information about vulnerability. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 101(4):799–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013a) Cost of equity in homeland security resource allocation in the face of a strategic attacker. Risk Anal. 33(6):1083–1099.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013b) Hybrid defensive resource allocations in the face of partially strategic attackers in a sequential defender–attacker game. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 228(1):262–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014a) Modeling credible retaliation threats in deterring the smuggling of nuclear weapons using partial inspection-A three-stage game. Decision Anal. 11(1):43–62.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014b) Subsidizing to disrupt a terrorism supply chain-A four-player game. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 65(7):1108–1119.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Modeling cumulative defensive resource allocation against a strategic attacker in a multi-period multi-target sequential game. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 179:12–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Protect: A deployed game theoretic system to protect the ports of the united states. van der Hoek W, Padgham L, eds. Proc. 11th Internat. Conf. Autonomous Agents Multiagent Systems, vol. 1 (International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC), 13–20.Google Scholar
- (1996) Contest success functions. Econom. Theory 7(2):283–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) The terrorists’ planning cycle. LaFree G, Freilich JD, eds. The Handbook of the Criminology of Terrorism (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 62–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) IRIS—A tool for strategic security allocation in transportation networks. Decker KS, Sichman JS, Sierra C, Castelfranchi C, eds. Proc. 8th Internat. Joint Conf. Autonomous Agents Multiagent Systems (Indust. Track), (International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC), 37–44.Google Scholar
- U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (2010) Appendix A. A Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century (Cosimo Inc., Fort Leavenworth, KS), A1–A6.Google Scholar
- (2011) Target-hardening decisions based on uncertain multi-attribute terrorist utility. Decision Anal. 8(4):286–302.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Estimating Terrorism Risk (RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) A robust approach to infrastructure security games. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 110(August):515–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Urban rail patrolling: A game theoretic approach. J. Transportation Security 11(1/2):1–18.Google Scholar
- (2007) Balancing terrorism and natural disasters—Defensive strategy with endogenous attacker effort. Oper. Res. 55(5):976–991.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Modeling secrecy and deception in a multiple-period attacker–defender signaling game. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 203(2):409–418.Crossref, Google Scholar

