Two-Stage Invest–Defend Game: Balancing Strategic and Operational Decisions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2018.0377

References

  • Baykal-Gürsoy M, Duan Z, Poor HV, Garnaev A (2014) Infrastructure security games. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 239(2):469–478.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bier VM, Abhichandani V (2002) Optimal allocation of resources for defense of simple series and parallel systems from determined adversaries. Haimes YY, Moser DA, Stakhiv EZ, eds. Proc. Engrg. Foundation Conf. Risk-Based Decisionmaking Water Resources X (American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA), 59–76.Google Scholar
  • Bier VM, Haphuriwat N, Menoyo J, Zimmerman R, Culpen AM (2008) Optimal resource allocation for defense of targets based on differing measures of attractiveness. Risk Anal. 28(3):763–770.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon GP, Netessine S (2004) Game theory in supply chain analysis. Simchi-Levi D, Wu SD, Shen ZM, eds. Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis (Springer, Boston), 13–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Debreu G (1952) A social equilibrium existence theorem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 38(10):886–893.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garcia ML (2005) Vulnerability Assessment of Physical Protection Systems (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Garnaev A, Baykal-Gürsoy M, Poor HV (2014) Incorporating attack-type uncertainty into network protection. IEEE Trans. Inform. Forensics Security 9(8):1278–1287.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garnaev A, Baykal-Gürsoy M, Poor HV (2015) How to deal with an intelligent adversary. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 90:352–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garnaev A, Baykal-Gürsoy M, Poor HV (2016) Security games with unknown adversarial strategies. IEEE Trans. Cybernetics 46(10):2291–2299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garrick BJ, James EH, Kilger M, McDonald JC, O’Toole T, Probst PS, Rindskopf Parker E, Rosenthal R, Trivelpiece AW, Van Arsdale LA (2004) Confronting the risks of terrorism: Making the right decisions. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 86(2):129–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golany B, Kaplan EH, Marmur A, Rothblum UG (2009) Nature plays with dice–terrorists do not: Allocating resources to counter strategic versus probabilistic risks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 192(1):198–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guan P, He M, Zhuang J, Hora SC (2017). Modeling a multi target attacker–defender game with budget constraints. Decision Anal. 14(2):87–107.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haphuriwat N, Bier VM, Willis HH (2011) Deterring the smuggling of nuclear weapons in container freight through detection and retaliation. Decision Anal. 8(2):88–102.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harris B (2004) Mathematical methods in combatting terrorism. Risk Anal. 24(4):985–988.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausken K (2002) Probabilistic risk analysis and game theory. Risk Anal. 22(1):17–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausken K (2006) Income, interdependence, and substitution effects affecting incentives for security investment. J. Accounting Public Policy 25(6):629–665.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausken K (2009) Strategic defense and attack of complex networks. Internat. J. Performability Engrg. 5(1):13–30.Google Scholar
  • Hausken K (2010) Defense and attack of complex and dependent systems. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 95(1):29–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausken K, Bier VM (2011) Defending against multiple different attackers. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 211(2):370–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausken K, He F (2016) On the effectiveness of security countermeasures for critical infrastructures. Risk Anal. 36(4):711–726.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausken K, Levitin G (2009) Parallel systems with different types of defense resource expenditure under two sequential attacks. Proc. Institution Mech. Engineers Part O: J. Risk Reliability 223(1):71–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausken K, Levitin G (2012) Review of systems defense and attack models. Internat. J. Performability Engrg. 8(4):355–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausken K, Zhuang J (2011) Governments’ and terrorists’ defense and attack in a t-period game. Decision Anal. 8(1):46–70.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hausken K, Bier VM, Zhuang J (2009) Defending against terrorism, natural disaster, and all hazards. Bier VM, Azaiez MN, eds. Game Theoretic Risk Analysis of Security Threats (Springer, New York), 65–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jose VRR, Zhuang J (2013) Technology adoption, accumulation, and competition in multi-period attacker-defender games. Military Oper. Res. 18(2):33–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S, Garrick BJ (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal. 1(1):11–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuhn HW, Tucker AW (1951) Nonlinear programming. Neyman J, ed. Proc. 2nd Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. Probab. (University of California Press, Berkeley), 481–492.Google Scholar
  • Levitin G (2009) Optimal distribution of constrained resources in bi-contest detection-impact game. Internat. J. Performability Engrg. 5(1):45–54.Google Scholar
  • Levitin G, Hausken K (2009) Intelligence and impact contests in systems with redundancy, false targets, and partial protection. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 94(12):1927–1941.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitin G, Hausken K (2010) Defence and attack of systems with variable attacker system structure detection probability. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 61(1):124–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitin G, Hausken K (2012a) Individual versus overarching protection against strategic attacks. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 63(7):969–981.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitin G, Hausken K (2012b) Parallel systems under two sequential attacks with imperfect detection of the first attack outcome. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 63(11):1545–1555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitin G, Hausken K (2012c) Resource distribution in multiple attacks with imperfect detection of the attack outcome. Risk Anal. 32(2):304–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGill WL, Ayyub BM, Kaminskiy M (2007) Risk analysis for critical asset protection. Risk Anal. 27(5):1265–1281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (2016) Annex of statistical information: Country reports on terrorism 2016. Report, Bureau of Counterterrorism and Countering Violent Extremism, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC. Google Scholar
  • Nikoofal ME, Zhuang J (2012) Robust allocation of a defensive budget considering an attacker’s private information. Risk Anal. 32(5):930–943.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paté-Cornell E (2002) Fusion of intelligence information: A Bayesian approach. Risk Anal. 22(3):445–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paté-Cornell E, Guikema S (2002) Probabilistic modeling of terrorist threats: A systems analysis approach to setting priorities among countermeasures. Military Oper. Res. 7(4):5–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng R, Levitin G, Xie M, Ng SH (2010) Defending simple series and parallel systems with imperfect false targets. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 95(6):679–688.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pita J, Jain M, Marecki J, Ordóñez F, Portway C, Tambe M, Western C, Paruchuri P, Kraus S (2008) Deployed armor protection: the application of a game theoretic model for security at the Los Angeles International Airport. Padgham L, Parkes D, Muller JP, eds. Proc. 7th Internat. Joint Conf. Autonomous Agents Multiagent Systems (Indust. Track) (International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC), 125–132.Google Scholar
  • Powell R (2007) Allocating defensive resources with private information about vulnerability. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 101(4):799–809.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shan X, Zhuang J (2013a) Cost of equity in homeland security resource allocation in the face of a strategic attacker. Risk Anal. 33(6):1083–1099.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shan X, Zhuang J (2013b) Hybrid defensive resource allocations in the face of partially strategic attackers in a sequential defender–attacker game. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 228(1):262–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shan X, Zhuang J (2014a) Modeling credible retaliation threats in deterring the smuggling of nuclear weapons using partial inspection-A three-stage game. Decision Anal. 11(1):43–62.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shan X, Zhuang J (2014b) Subsidizing to disrupt a terrorism supply chain-A four-player game. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 65(7):1108–1119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shan X, Zhuang J (2018) Modeling cumulative defensive resource allocation against a strategic attacker in a multi-period multi-target sequential game. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 179:12–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shieh E, An B, Yang R, Tambe M, Baldwin C, DiRenzo J, Maule B, Meyer G (2012) Protect: A deployed game theoretic system to protect the ports of the united states. van der Hoek W, Padgham L, eds. Proc. 11th Internat. Conf. Autonomous Agents Multiagent Systems, vol. 1 (International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC), 13–20.Google Scholar
  • Skaperdas S (1996) Contest success functions. Econom. Theory 7(2):283–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith BL, Roberts P, Damphousse KR (2017) The terrorists’ planning cycle. LaFree G, Freilich JD, eds. The Handbook of the Criminology of Terrorism (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 62–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai J, Kiekintveld C, Ordonez F, Tambe M, Rathi S (2009) IRIS—A tool for strategic security allocation in transportation networks. Decker KS, Sichman JS, Sierra C, Castelfranchi C, eds. Proc. 8th Internat. Joint Conf. Autonomous Agents Multiagent Systems (Indust. Track), (International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC), 37–44.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (2010) Appendix A. A Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century (Cosimo Inc., Fort Leavenworth, KS), A1–A6.Google Scholar
  • Wang C, Bier VM (2011) Target-hardening decisions based on uncertain multi-attribute terrorist utility. Decision Anal. 8(4):286–302.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Willis HH, Morral AR, Kelly TK, Medby JJ (2005) Estimating Terrorism Risk (RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yolmeh A, Baykal-Gürsoy M (2017) A robust approach to infrastructure security games. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 110(August):515–526.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yolmeh A, Baykal-Gürsoy M (2018) Urban rail patrolling: A game theoretic approach. J. Transportation Security 11(1/2):1–18.Google Scholar
  • Zhuang J, Bier VM (2007) Balancing terrorism and natural disasters—Defensive strategy with endogenous attacker effort. Oper. Res. 55(5):976–991.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhuang J, Bier VM, Alagoz O (2010) Modeling secrecy and deception in a multiple-period attacker–defender signaling game. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 203(2):409–418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.