On the Geometry of Nash and Correlated Equilibria with Cumulative Prospect Theoretic Preferences

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2018.0378

References

  • Allais M (1953) Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école américaine. Econometrica J. Econometric Soc. 21(4):503–546.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aumann RJ (1974) Subjectivity and correlation in randomized strategies. J. Math. Econom. 1(1):67–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aumann RJ (1987) Correlated equilibrium as an expression of Bayesian rationality. Econometrica 55(1):1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Calvó-Armengol A (2006) The set of correlated equilibria of 2×2 games. Working Paper 79, Barcelona Graduate School of Economics, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  • Canovas SG, Hansen P, Jaumard B (1999) Nash equilibria from the correlated equilibria viewpoint. Internat. Game Theory Rev. 1(1):33–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chateauneuf A, Wakker P (1999) An axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory for decision under risk. J. Risk Uncertainty 18(2):137–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cripps M (1995) Extreme correlated and Nash equilibria in two-person games. Working paper, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.Google Scholar
  • Evangelista FS, Raghavan TE (1996) A note on correlated equilibrium. Internat. J. Game Theory 25(1):35–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn PC, Kochenberger GA (1979) Two-piece von Neumann-Morgenstern utility functions. Decision Sci. 10(4):503–518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foster DP, Vohra RV (1997) Calibrated learning and correlated equilibrium. Games Econom. Behav. 21(1/2):40–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foster DP, Young HP (2006) Regret testing: Learning to play Nash equilibrium without knowing you have an opponent. Theoret. Econom. 1(3):341–367.Google Scholar
  • Hart S, Mas-Colell A (2000) A simple adaptive procedure leading to correlated equilibrium. Econometrica 68(5):1127–1150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica J. Econometric Soc. 47(2):263–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keskin K (2016) Equilibrium notions for agents with cumulative prospect theory preferences. Decision Anal. 13(3):192–208.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nash J (1951) Non-cooperative games. Ann. Math. 54(2):286–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nau R, Canovas SG, Hansen P (2004) On the geometry of Nash equilibria and correlated equilibria. Internat. J. Game Theory 32(4):443–453.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prelec D (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3):497–527.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainity 5(4):297–323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Viossat Y (2006) The geometry of Nash equilibria and correlated equilibria and a generalization of zero-sum games. Technical report, SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 641, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (2007) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Wakker PP (2010) Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.