Principal–Agent Theory, Game Theory, and the Precautionary Principle

References

• Aldred J (2012) Climate change uncertainty, irreversibility and the precautionary principle. Cambridge J. Econom. 36(5):1051–1072.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldred J (2013) Justifying precautionary policies: Incommensurability and uncertainty. Ecological Econom. 96:132–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ale BJM, Hartford DND, Slater D (2015) ALARP and CBA all in the same game. Safety Sci. 76:90–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arce DG (2013) Principals’ preferences for agents with social preferences. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 90:154–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asano T (2010) Precautionary principle and the optimal timing of environmental policy under ambiguity. Environ. Resource Econom. 47(2):173–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athanassoglou S, Xepapadeas A (2012) Pollution control with uncertain stock dynamics: When, and how, to be precautious. J. Environ. Econom. Management 63(3):304–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aven T (2011) On different types of uncertainties in the context of the precautionary principle. Risk Anal. 31(10):1515–1525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aven T (2016) Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 253(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron DP, Myerson RB (1982) Regulating a monopolist with unknown costs. Econometrica 50(4):911–930.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernheim BD, Whinston MD (1986) Common agency. Econometrica 54(4):923–942.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhimani A, Hausken K, Ncube M (2010) Agent takeover risk of principal in outsourcing relationships. Global Bus. Econom. Rev. 12(4):329–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bier V, Hausken K (2011) Endogenizing the sticks and carrots: Modeling possible perverse effects of counterterrorism measures. Ann. Oper. Res. 186(1):39–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biglaiser G, Mezzetti C (1993) Principals competing for an agent in the presence of adverse selection and moral hazard. J. Econom. Theory 61(2):302–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bishop RC (1978) Endangered species and uncertainty: The economics of a safe minimum standard. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 60(1):10–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bothe M (2003) Terrorism and the legality of pre-emptive force. Eur. J. Internat. Law 14(2):227–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brent JC (1999) An agent and two principals—U.S. Court of Appeals responses to employment division, Department of Human Resources v. Smith and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Amer. Politics Quart. 27(2):236–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castillo M, Petrie R, Torero M (2010) On the preferences of principals and agents. Econom. Inquiry 48(2):266–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cingranelli D, Fajardo-Heyward P, Filippov M (2014) Principals, agents and human rights. British J. Political Sci. 44(3):605–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crowards TM (1998) Safe minimum standards: Costs and opportunities. Ecological Econom. 25(3):303–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Currie M, Steedman I (1997) The ordinality of effort revisited. Metroeconomica 48(3):306–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Goede M (2008) The politics of preemption and the war on terror in Europe. Eur. J. Internat. Relations 14(1):161–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demange G, Laroque G (1998) Long-sighted principal and myopic agents. J. Math. Econom. 30(2):119–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorman P (2005) Evolving knowledge and the precautionary principle. Ecological Econom. 53(2):169–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JS, Sarin RK (1979) Measurable multiattribute value functions. Oper. Res. 27(4):810–822.Link, Google Scholar
• Fahey NSC, Tsuji LJS (2006) Is there a need to re-examine the approval of bismuth shotshell as a non-toxic alternative to lead based on the precautionary principle? J. Environ. Monitoring 8(12):1190–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer AJ, Ghelardi G (2016) The precautionary principle, evidence-based medicine, and decision theory in public health evaluation. Frontiers Public Health 4:107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gailmard S (2009) Multiple principals and oversight of bureaucratic policy-making. J. Theoret. Politics 21(2):161–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gintis H (1995) Taking effort seriously: A reply to Currie and Steedman. Metroeconomica 46(2):202–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gollier C (2001) Should we beware of the precautionary principle? Econom. Policy 16(33):302–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gollier C, Treich N (2003) Decision-making under scientific uncertainty: The economics of the precautionary principle. J. Risk Uncertainty 27(1):77–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gollier C, Jullien B, Treich N (2000) Scientific progress and irreversibility: An economic interpretation of the ‘precautionary principle’. J. Public Econom. 75(2):229–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant S, Quiggin J (2013) Bounded awareness, heuristics and the precautionary principle. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 93(C):17–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grijalva T, Berrens RP, Shaw WD (2011) Species preservation vs. development: An experimental investigation under uncertainty. Ecological Econom. 70(5):995–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Romano RE (1998) Monitoring the principal with multiple agents. RAND J. Econom. 29(2):427–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC (1967) Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, I-III. Part I. The basic model. Management Sci. 14(3):159–182.Link, Google Scholar
• Hausken K (1996) Ethics and efficiency in organizations. Internat. J. Soc. Econom. 23(9):15–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausken K (2015) Cost benefit analysis of war. Internat. J. Conflict Management 27(4):454–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausken K (2016) A cost-benefit analysis of terrorist attacks. Defence Peace Econom. 29(2):111–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausken K (2018) Formalizing the precautionary principle accounting for strategic interaction, natural factors, and technological factors. Risk Anal. 38(10):2055–2072.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausken K, Levitin G (2011) Active vs. passive defense against a strategic attacker. Internat. Game Theory Rev. 13(1):1–12.Google Scholar
• Hausken K, Zhuang J (2011) Governments’ and terrorists’ defense and attack in a T-period game. Decision Anal. 8(1):46–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Heal G, Kriström B (2002) Uncertainty and climate change. Official J. Eur. Assoc. Environ. Resource Economists 22(1):3–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennlock M (2009) Precautionary policy rules in an integrated climate-economy differential game with climate model uncertainty. Contributions Game Theory Management 2:154–178.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katzner DW, Skott P (2004) Economic explanation, ordinality and the adequacy of analytic specification. J. Econom. Methodology 11(4):437–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Thompson L (2011) Do agents negotiate for the best (or worst) interest of principals? Secure, anxious and avoidant principal-agent attachment. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 47(3):681–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lempert RJ, Collins MT (2007) Managing the risk of uncertain threshold responses: Comparison of robust, optimum, and precautionary approaches. Risk Anal. 27(4):1009–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leslie D (1995) On the proper use of ordinal variables in labour market models. Manchester School 63(2):196–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewontin RC (1961) Evolution and the theory of games. J. Theoret. Biol. 1(3):382–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lowenberg AD, Mathews T (2008) Why Iraq? Defence Peace Econom. 19(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majone G (2002) The precautionary principle and its policy implications. JCMS: J. Common Market Stud. 40(1):89–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maskin E, Riley J (1984) Monopoly with incomplete information. RAND J. Econom. 15(2):171–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLean C, Patterson A (2006) A precautionary approach to foreign policy? A preliminary analysis of Tony Blair’s speeches on Iraq 1. British J. Politics Internat. Relations 8(3):351–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1992) Economics, Organization and Management (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Osimani B (2013) The precautionary principle in the pharmaceutical domain: A philosophical enquiry into probabilistic reasoning and risk aversion. Health Risk Soc. 15(2):123–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF (1980) Bounded rationality in budgetary research. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 74(2):354–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmini D (1999) Uncertainty, risk aversion, and the game theoretic foundations of the safe minimum standard: A reassessment. Ecological Econom. 29(3):463–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Persson E (2016) What are the core ideas behind the precautionary principle? Sci. Total Environ. 557:134–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rapoport A, Guyer M (1966) A taxonomy of 2x2 games. General Systems XI:203–214.Google Scholar
• Rasmusen E (2007) Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory, 4th ed. (Blackwell, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
• Rasmussen TH (2000) State regulatory principals and local bureaucratic agents—The politics of local solid waste management. Amer. Rev. Public Admin. 30(3):292–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ready RC, Bishop RC (1991) Endangered species and the safe minimum standard. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 73(2):309–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogerson WP (1985) Repeated moral hazard. Econometrica 53(1):69–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandin P (1999) Dimensions of the precautionary principle. Human Ecological Risk Assessment: Internat. J. 5(5):889–907.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandin P, Peterson M, Hansson SO, Rudén C, Juthe A (2002) Five charges against the precautionary principle. J. Risk Res. 5(4):287–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schelling TC (1960) The Strategy of Conflict (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Selden SC, Brewer GA, Brudney JL (1999) The role of city managers—Are they principals, agents, or both? Amer. Rev. Public Admin. 29(2):124–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro SP (2016) Standing in another’s shoes: How agents make life-and-death decisions for their principals. Acad. Management Perspect. 30(4):404–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skott P (1997) Measuring effort. Metroeconomica 48(3):300–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starkl M, Brunner N, Flogl W, Wimmer J (2009) Design of an institutional decision-making process: The case of urban water management. J. Environ. Management 90(2):1030–1042.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steele K (2006) The precautionary principle: A new approach to public decision-making? Law Probab. Risk 5(1):19–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern J, Wiener JB (2006) Precaution against terrorism. J. Risk Res. 9(4):393–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sunstein CR (2005) The precautionary principle as a basis for decision making. Economists’ Voice 2(2):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toohey K, Taylor T (2008) Mega events, fear, and risk: Terrorism at the Olympic Games. J. Sport Management 22(4):451–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treich N (2001) What is the economic meaning of the precautionary principle? Geneva Papers Risk Insurance 26(3):334–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vogel D (2012) The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety, and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Wiener JB (2002) Precaution in a multi-risk world. Paustenbach DJ, ed. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: Theory and Practice (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ), 1509–1531.Google Scholar
• Wiener JB (2013) The politics of precaution, and the reality. Regulation Governance 7(2):258–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiener JB, Rogers MD (2002) Comparing precaution in the United States and Europe. J. Risk Res. 5(4):317–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiener JB, Rogers MD, Hammitt JK, Sand PH (2011) The Reality of Precaution: Comparing Risk Regulation in the United States and Europe (RFF Press/Earthscan/Routledge, Washington, DC and London).Google Scholar