Gulf Coast Port Selection Using Multiple-Objective Decision Analysis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2018.0381

References

  • Bhadury J (2016) Panama Canal expansion and its impact on East and Gulf coast ports of USA. Maritime Policy Management 43(8):928–944.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bureau of Transportation Statistics (2016) State summaries: 2012 commodity flow survey. Report, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available at https://www.bts.dot.gov/sites/bts.dot.gov/files/legacy/2012%20CFS%20State%20Summary%20Report_5-26-16_FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Butler JC, Dyer JS, Jia J (2006) Using attributes to predict objectives in preference models. Decision Anal. 3(2):100–116.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • CanagaRetna SM (2010) The Panama Canal expansion and SLC state ports. Special series report, Southern Office of the Council of State Governments, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  • Chou C (2010) AHP model for the container port choice in the multiple-ports region. J. Marine Sci. Tech. 18(2):221–232.Google Scholar
  • De Icaza R (2017) Decision support system for container port selection using multiple-objective decision analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
  • De Icaza R, Parnell G, Aloysius J (2017) Port selection analysis: Trends and gaps. PhD dissertation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
  • Dyck G, Ismael H (2015) Multi-criteria evaluation of port competitiveness in West Africa using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Amer. J. Indust. Bus. Management 5(6):432–446.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer JS, Sarin RK (1979) Measurable multiattribute value functions. Oper. Res. 27(4):810–822.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ewing B, Baker E (2009) Development of a green building decision support tool: A collaborative process. Decision Anal. 6(3):172–185.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gohomene D, Bonsal S, Maistralis E, Wang J, Li K (2015) The attractiveness of ports in West Africa: Some lessons from shipping lines’ port selection. Growth Change 47(3):416–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grosso M, Monteiro F (2009) Relevant strategic criteria when choosing a container port—The case of the Port of Genoa. Özay Özaydın, ed. Proc. Internat. Conf. Prospects Res. Transport Logist. Regional–Global Perspect. (Dogus University Publications, Istanbul), 299–306.Google Scholar
  • Hilliard H, Parnell G, Pohl E (2015) Evaluating the effectiveness of the global nuclear detection architecture using multiobjective decision analysis. Systems Engrg. 18(5):441–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • JOC (2016). Trans-Pacific trade. JOC.com (December 2), http://www.joc.com/special-topics/trans-pacific-trade.Google Scholar
  • Keeney RL (1992) Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Keeney RL (1993) Creativity in MS/OR: Value-focused thinking—Creativity directed toward decision making. Interfaces 23(3):62–67.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL (1994) Creativity in decision making with value-focused thinking. Sloan Management Rev. 35(4):33–41.Google Scholar
  • Keeney R, Gregory R (2005) Selecting attributes to measure the achievement of objectives. Oper. Res. 53(1):1–11.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL, Raïffa H (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Keeney R, von Winterfeldt D (2011) A value model for evaluating homeland security decisions. Risk Anal. 31(9):1470–1487.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim JY (2014) Port user typology and representations of port choice behavior: A Q-methodological study. Maritime Econom. Logist. 16(2):165–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirkwood C (1997) Strategic Decision Making Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets (Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
  • Lam J, Dai J (2012) A decision support system for port selection. Transportation Planning Tech. 35(4):509–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loh H, Thai V (2015) Management of disruptions by seaports: Preliminary findings. Asia Pacific J. Marketing Logist. 27(1):146–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) (2015a) Billion-dollar weather and climate disasters: Mapping. Accessed October 5, 2016, https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/mapping.Google Scholar
  • National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) (2015b) National temperature and precipitation maps. Accessed October 10, 2016, https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/us-maps/.Google Scholar
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2010) U.S. tornado climatology. Accessed August 15, 2016, https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/climate-information/extreme-events/us-tornado-climatology.Google Scholar
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2015) Severe weather data inventory. Accessed August 20, 2016, https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/swdi/#TileSearch.Google Scholar
  • Nightingale L (2016) Global box trade forecast to grow 4.1% in 2016. Lloyd's Loading List (April 6), http://www.lloydsloadinglist.com/freight-directory/news/Global-box-trade-forecast-to-grow-4.1-in-2016/66061.htm.Google Scholar
  • Palisade Corporation (2016) @RISK 7.5. Computer software, Palisade Corporation, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  • Panayides P, Song D-W (2012) Determinants of users’ port choice. Talley WK, ed. The Blackwell Companion to Maritime Economics (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA), 599–622.Google Scholar
  • Parnell G, Trainor TE (2009) Using the swing weight matrix to weight multiple objectives. INCOSE Internat. Sympos. 19(1):283–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parnell G, Bresnick T, Tani S, Johnson E (2013) Handbook of Decision Analysis, vol. 6 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rodrigue J-P (2010) Factors impacting North American freight distribution in view of the Panama Canal expansion. Report, Van Horne Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.Google Scholar
  • Sanchez R, Ng A, Garcia-Alonso L (2011) Port selection factors and attractiveness: The service providers’ perspective. Transportation J. 50(2):141–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schrank D, Eisele B, Lomax T, Bak J (2015) 2015 urban mobility scorecard. Report, Texas A&M Transportation Institute/INRIX, College Station, TX/Kirkland, WA.Google Scholar
  • Seedah D, Harrison R, Boske L, Kruse J (2013) Container terminal and cargo-handling cost analysis toolkit. Report, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.Google Scholar
  • Simon J, Regnier E, Whitney L (2014) A value-focused approach to energy transformation in the United States Department of Defense. Decision Anal. 11(2):117–132.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Steven A, Corsi T (2012) Choosing a port: An analysis of containerized imports into the US. Transportation Res. Part E 48(4):881–895.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tang L, Low J, Lam S (2011) Understanding port choice behavior—A network perspective. Networks Spatial Econom. 11(1):65–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tongzon JL (2009) Port choice and freight forwarders. Transportation Res. Part E 45(1):186–195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ugboma C, Ugboma O, Ogwude I (2006) An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach to port selection decisions—Empirical evidence from Nigerian ports. Maritime Econom. Logist. 8(3):251–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2015) Review of Maritime Transport 2015 (United Nations, Geneva).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2016) Review of Maritime Transport 2016 (United Nations, Geneva).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2014) U.S. waterborne container traffic by port. Accessed August 23, 2016, http://www.navigationdatacenter.us/wcsc/by_porttons14.html.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Transportation/U.S. Maritime Administration (DOT-MARAD) (2013) Panama Canal expansion study—Phase I report: Developments in trade and national and global economies. Report, Economic Development Research Group, Boston.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Maritime Administration (MARAD) (2015) Maritime data and statistics. 2015 container ship capacities calling at U.S. container ports. Accessed October 25, 2016, https://www.marad.dot.gov/resources/data-statistics/#trade-stats.Google Scholar
  • Veldman S, Garcia-Alonso L, Vallejo-Pinto J (2011) Determinants of container port choice in Spain. Maritime Policy Management 38(5):509–522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watson S, Buede D (1987) Decision Synthesis: The Principles and Practice of Decision Analysis (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Wu Y, Liu J, Peng C (2014) Analysis of port and inland transport mode selection. Proc. 11th Internat. Conf. Service Systems Service Management (ICSSSM) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1–6.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.