Open Source or Closed Source? A Competitive Analysis with Software Security
Published Online:30 Dec 2019https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2019.0390
References
- (2006) Network software security and user incentives. Management Sci. 52(11):1703–1720.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Who should be responsible for software security? A comparative analysis of liability policies in network environments. Management Sci. 57(5):934–959.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Licensing and competition for services in open source software. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):1068–1086.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Windows vs. Linux: A comparative study. Proposal, Technical Writing, Blinn College, Bryan, TX. Accessed January 21, 2019, https://www.floralaccountingsystems.com/about_us/LinuxWindows.php.Google Scholar
- (2006) Dynamic mixed duopoly: A model motivated by Linux vs. Windows. Management Sci. 52(7):1072–1084.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Investment incentives in open-source and proprietary two-sided platforms. J. Econom. Management Strategy 24(2):306–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) When to make proprietary software open source. J. Econom. Dynamics Control 37(6):1182–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) The impact of network externalities on the competition between open source and proprietary software. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(4):201–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Hacker behavior, network effects, and the security software market. J. Management Inform. Systems 29(2):77–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Quality competition and market segmentation in the security software market. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(2):589–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Sci. 52(7):1057–1071.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) The economic incentives for sharing security information. Inform. Systems Res. 16(2):186–208.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Information security investment for competitive firms with hacker behavior and security requirements. Ann. Oper. Res. 235(1):277–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016a) A differential game approach to security investment and information sharing in a competitive environment. IIE Trans. 48(6):511–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016b) Economic incentives in security information sharing: The effects of market structures. Inform. Tech. Management 17(4):361–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Information security investment when hackers disseminate knowledge. Decision Anal. 10(4):352–368.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Dynamic platform competition with malicious users. Dynamic Games Appl. 4(3):290–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Open source development with a commercial complementary product or service. Production Oper. Management 17(1):29–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Income, interdependence, and substitution effects affecting incentives for security investment. J. Accounting Public Policy 25(6):629–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) The impact of open source software on the strategic choices of firms developing proprietary software. J. Management Inform. Systems 25(3):241–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) When should a firm open its source code: A strategic analysis. Production Oper. Management 20(6):877–888.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Competitive strategy for open source software. Marketing Sci. 30(6):1066–1078.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Divide and conquer: Competing with free technology under network effects. Production Oper. Management 17(1):12–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) When hackers talk: Managing information security under variable attack rates and knowledge dissemination. Inform. Systems Res. 22(3):606–623.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Understanding open source software development: A research classification framework. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17:266–287.Google Scholar
- (2004) Security report: Windows vs. Linux: An independent assessment. The Register (October 22), http://www.theregister.co.uk/security/security_report_windows_vs_linux.Google Scholar
- (2007) A strategic analysis of competition between open source and proprietary software. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(1):233–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Lock-in strategy in software competition: Open source software vs. proprietary software. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):536–545.Link, Google Scholar

