On Bilevel Optimization with Inexact Follower

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2019.0392

References

  • Aboussoror A, Adly S, Saissi FE (2017) Strong-weak nonlinear bilevel problems: existence of solutions in a sequential setting. Set-Valued Variational Anal. 25(1):113–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aboussoror A, Loridan P (1995) Strong-weak stackelberg problems in finite dimensional spaces. Serdica Math. J. 21(2):151–170.Google Scholar
  • Aboussoror A, Mansouri A (2005) Weak linear bilevel programming problems: existence of solutions via a penalty method. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 304(1):399–408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adams W, Forrester R (2005) A simple recipe for concise mixed 0-1 linearizations. Oper. Res. Lett. 33(1):55–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arroyo JM, Galiana FD (2005) On the solution of the bilevel programming formulation of the terrorist threat problem. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 20(2):789–797.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Audet C, Haddad J, Savard G (2007a) Disjunctive cuts for continuous linear bilevel programming. Optim. Lett. 1(3):259–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Audet C, Savard G, Zghal W (2007b) New branch-and-cut algorithm for bilevel linear programming. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 134(2):353–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Audet C, Hansen P, Jaumard B, Savard G (1997) Links between linear bilevel and mixed 0-1 programming problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 93(2):273–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balas E, Zemel E (1980) An algorithm for large zero-one knapsack problems. Oper. Res. 28(5):1130–1154.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bard JF (1998) Practical bilevel optimization: algorithms and applications. Nonconvex optimization and its applications (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bard JF, Plummer J, Sourie JC (2000) A bilevel programming approach to determining tax credits for biofuel production. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 120(1):30–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beheshti B, Özaltın O, Zare MH, Prokopyev OA (2015) Exact solution approach for a class of nonlinear bilevel knapsack problems. J. Global Optim. 61(2):291–310.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Sim M (2003) Robust discrete optimization and network flows. Math. Programming 98(1):49–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Sim M (2004) The price of robustness. Oper. Res. 52(1):35–53.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Borrero JS, Prokopyev OA, Saure D (2016) Sequential shortest path interdiction with incomplete information. Decision Anal. 13(1):68–98.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Borrero JS, Prokopyev OA, Saure D (2019) Sequential interdiction with incomplete information and learning. Oper. Res. 67(1):33–57.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brotcorne L, Hanafi S, Mansi R (2009) A dynamic programming algorithm for the bilevel knapsack problem. Oper. Res. Lett. 37(3):215–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown G, Carlyle M, Salmeron J, Wood K (2006) Defending critical infrastructure. Interfaces 36(6):530–544.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burgard A, Pharkya P, Maranas C (2003) Optknock: A bilevel programming framework for identifying gene knockout strategies for microbial strain optimization. Biotech. Bioengrg. 84(6):647–657.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cao D, Leung L (2002) A partial cooperation model for non-unique linear two-level decision problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 140(1):134–141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caprara A, Carvalho M, Lodi A, Woeginger GJ (2013) A complexity and approximability study of the bilevel knapsack problem. Goemans M, Correa J, eds. Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7801 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 98–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caprara A, Carvalho M, Lodi A, Woeginger GJ (2014) A study on the computational complexity of the bilevel knapsack problem. SIAM J. Optim. 24(2):823–838.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caprara A, Carvalho M, Lodi A, Woeginger GJ (2016) Bilevel knapsack with interdiction constraints. INFORMS J. Comput. 28(2):319–333.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caramia M, Mari R (2015) Enhanced exact algorithms for discrete bilevel linear problems. Optim. Lett. 9(7):1447–1468.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colson B, Marcotte P, Savard G (2007) An overview of bilevel optimization. Ann. Oper. Res. 153(1):235–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Côté J-P, Savard G (2003) A bilevel modelling approach to pricing and fare optimization in the airline industry. J. Revenue Pricing Management 2(1):23–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • CPLEX (2016) http://www-01.ibm.com/software/info/ilog/. Accessed on January 7, 2016.Google Scholar
  • Dempe S (2002) Foundations of Bilevel Programming (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands).Google Scholar
  • Dempe S, Richter K (2000) Bilevel programming with knapsack constraints. Central Eur. J. Oper. Res. 8(2):93–107.Google Scholar
  • DeNegre ST, Ralphs TK (2009) A branch-and-cut algorithm for bilevel integer programming. Chinneck JW, Kristjansson B, Saltzman MJ, eds. Proc. 11th INFORMS Comput. Soc. Meeting (Springer, New York), 65–78.Google Scholar
  • Deng X (1998) Complexity issues in bilevel linear programming. Pardalos P, Migdalas A, Varbrand P, eds. Multilevel optimization: algorithms and applications (Springer, New York), 149–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fayard D, Plateau G (1982) An algorithm for the solution of the 0–1 knapsack problem. Computing 28(3):269–287.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Garey M, Johnson D (1979), Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness (WH Freeman, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Gendreau M, Potvin J-Y (2010) Handbook of Metaheuristics, vol. 2 (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guan P, He M, Zhuang J, Hora SC (2017) Modeling a multitarget attacker–defender game with budget constraints. Decision Anal. 14(2):87–107.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gzara F (2013) A cutting plane approach for bilevel hazardous material transport network design. Oper. Res. Lett. 41(1):40–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harker PT, Pang J-S (1988) Existence of optimal solutions to mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. Oper. Res. Lett. 7(2):61–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogarth RM, Karelaia N (2005) Simple models for multiattribute choice with many alternatives: When it does and does not pay to face trade-offs with binary attributes. Management Sci. 51(12):1860–1872.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Horowitz E, Sahni S (1974) Computing partitions with applications to the knapsack problem. J. ACM 21(2):277–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra OH, Kim CE (1975) Fast approximation algorithms for the knapsack and sum of subset problems. J. ACM 22(4):463–468.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kellerer H, Pferschy U, Pisinger D (2004) Knapsack Problems (Springer, Berlin).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martello S, Toth P (1977) An upper bound for the zero-one knapsack problem and a branch and bound algorithm. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1(3):169–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martello S, Toth P (1988) A new algorithm for the 0-1 knapsack problem. Management Sci. 34(5):633–644.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Martello S, Toth P (1990) Knapsack Problems (Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
  • Mersha AG, Dempe S (2006) Linear bilevel programming with upper level constraints depending on the lower level solution. Appl. Math. Comput. 180(1):247–254.Google Scholar
  • Nikoofal ME, Zhuang J (2012) Robust allocation of a defensive budget considering an attacker’s private information. Risk Anal.: Internat. J. 32(5):930–943.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nikoofal ME, Zhuang J (2015) On the value of exposure and secrecy of defense system: First-mover advantage vs. robustness. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 246(1):320–330.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Özaltın OY, Propkopyev OA, Schaefer AJ (2010) The bilevel knapsack problem with stochastic right-hand sides. Oper. Res. Lett. 38(4):328–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pardalos PM, Resende MG (2002) Handbook of Applied Optimization (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ren S, Zeng B, Qian X (2013) Adaptive bilevel programming for optimal gene knockouts for targeted overproduction under phenotypic constraints. BMC Bioinformatics 14(Suppl 2):Article S17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuel A, Guikema SD (2012) Resource allocation for homeland defense: Dealing with the team effect. Decision Anal. 9(3):238–252.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shan X, Zhuang J (2013) Hybrid defensive resource allocations in the face of partially strategic attackers in a sequential defender-attacker game. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 228(1):262–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shen S, Smith JC, Goli R (2012) Exact interdiction models and algorithms for disconnecting networks via node deletions. Discrete Optim. 9(3):172–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith JC, Lim C, Sudargho F (2007) Survivable network design under optimal and heuristic interdiction scenarios. J. Global Optim. 38(2):181–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tahernejad S, DeNegre S, Ralphs T (2016) A branch-and-cut algorithm for mixed integer bilevel linear optimization problems and its implementation. Technical Report 16T-015-R3, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.Google Scholar
  • Tang Y, Richard J, Smith J (2015) A class of algorithms for mixed-integer bilevel min–max optimization. J. Global Optim. 66:225–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Toth P (1980) Dynamic programming algorithms for the zero-one knapsack problem. Computing 25(1):29–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vicente LN, Savard G, Judice J (1996) Discrete linear bilevel programming problem. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 89(3):597–614.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wood R (1993) Deterministic network interdiction. Math. Comput. Model. 17(2):1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zare MH, Borrero JS, Zeng B, Prokopyev OA (2019) A note on linearized reformulations for a class of bilevel linear integer problems. Ann. Oper. Res. 272(1–2):99–117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zare MH, Özaltın OY, Prokopyev OA (2018) On a class of bilevel linear mixed-integer programs in adversarial settings. J. Global Optim. 71(1):91–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang J, Zhuang J, Behlendorf B (2018) Stochastic shortest path network interdiction with a case study of arizona–mexico border. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 179:62–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zheng Y, Wan Z, Jia S, Wang G (2015) A new method for strong-weak linear bilevel programming problem. J. Indust. Management Optim. 11(2):529–547.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.