A Probability Scoring Rule for Simultaneous Events

References

• Baker RD, McHale IG (2013) Optimal betting under parameter uncertainty: Improving the Kelly criterion. Decision Anal. 10(3):189–199.Link, Google Scholar
• Bernardo JM (1979) Expected information as expected utility. Ann. Statist. 7(3):686–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bickel JE (2007) Some comparisons among quadratic, spherical, and logarithmic scoring rules. Decision Anal. 4(2):49–65.Link, Google Scholar
• Carvalho A (2016) An overview of applications of proper scoring rules. Decision Anal. 13(4):223–242.Link, Google Scholar
• Gneiting T, Raftery AE (2007) Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction and estimation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 102(477):359–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty J, Granhag PA, Hartwig M, Loftus EF (2010) Insightful or wishful: Lawyers’ ability to predict case outcomes. Psych. Public Policy Law 16(2):133–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant A, Johnstone D, Kwon O (2008) Optimal betting strategies for simultaneous games. Decision Anal. 5(1):10–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnstone DJ (2011) Economic interpretation of probabilities estimated by maximum likelihood or score. Management Sci. 57(2):308–314.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnstone DJ, Jose VRR, Winkler RL (2011) Tailored scoring rules for probabilities. Decision Anal. 8(4):256–268.Link, Google Scholar
• Jose VR, Nau RF, Winkler RL (2008) Scoring rules, generalized entropy, and utility maximization. Oper. Res. 56(5):1146–1157.Link, Google Scholar
• Kadane JB (2011) Partial-Kelly strategies and expected utility: Small-edge asymptotics. Decision Anal. 8(1):4–9.Link, Google Scholar
• Kelly JL (1956) A new interpretation of information rate. Bell System Tech. J. 35(4):917–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacLean LC, Ziemba WT, Blazenko G (1992) Growth vs. security in dynamic investment analysis. Management Sci. 38(11):1562–1585.Link, Google Scholar
• MacLean LC, Sanegre R, Zhao Y, Ziemba WT (2004) Capital growth with security. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 28(5):937–954.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merkle EC, Steyvers M (2013) Choosing a strictly proper scoring rule. Decision Anal. 10(4):277–370.Link, Google Scholar
• Murphy AH (1966) A note on the utility of probabilistic predictions and the probability score in the cost-loss ratio decision situation. J. Appl. Meteorology Climatology 5(4):534–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy AH (1973) A new vector partition of the probability score. J. Appl. Meteorology Climatology 12(4):595–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy AH (1977) The value of climatological, categorical, and probabilistic forecasts in the cost-loss ratio situation. Monthly Weather Rev. 105:803–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy AH (1985) Decision making and the value of forecasts in a generalized model of the cost-loss ratio situation. Monthly Weather Rev. 113:362–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage LJ (1971) Elicitation of personal probabilities and expectations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 66(336):783–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkler RL (1996) Scoring rules and the evaluation of probabilities. Test 5(1):1–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkler RL, Jose VRR (2011) Scoring rules. Cochran JJ, ed. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 11 (Wiley, New York), 4733–4744.Crossref, Google Scholar