Computational Efficiency in Multivariate Adversarial Risk Analysis Models

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2019.0394

References

  • Banks DL, Rios J, Ríos Insua D (2016) Adversarial Risk Analysis (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
  • Bielza C, Müller P, Ríos Insua D (1999) Decision analysis by augmented probability simulation. Management Sci. 45(7):995–1007.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bonferroni CE (1936) Teoria Statistica delle Classi e Calcolo delle Probabilità (in Italian) (Libreria Internazionale Seeber).Google Scholar
  • Brown GG, Cox LA> Jr (2011) How probabilistic risk assessment can mislead terrorism risk analysts. Risk Anal. 31(2):196–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bueno de Mesquita B (1997) A decision making model: Its structure and form. Internat. Interactions 23(3–4):235–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bueno de Mesquita E (2005) Conciliation, counterterrorism, and patterns of terrorist violence. Internat. Organ. 59(1):145–176.Google Scholar
  • Chen CH, Lee LH (2011) Stochastic Simulation Optimization: An Optimal Computing Budget Allocation, System Engineering and Operations Research, vol. 1 (World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ)Google Scholar
  • Chen CH, Lin J, Yucesan E, Chick SE (2000) Simulation budget allocation for further enhancing the efficiency of ordinal optimization. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems 10(3):251–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen W, Gao S, Chen CH, Shi L (2014) An optimal sample allocation strategy for partition-based random search. IEEE Trans. Automation Sci. Engrg. 11(1):177–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chick SE, Branke J, Schmidt C (2010) Sequential sampling to myopically maximize the expected value of information. INFORMS J. Comput. 22(1):71–80.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chwe MSY (2000) Communication and coordination in social networks. Rev. Econom. Stud. 67(1):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmond C (2013) Information manipulation, coordination, and regime change. Rev. Econom. Stud. 80(4):1422–1458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fan W, Hong LJ, Nelson BL (2016) Indifference-zone-free selection of the best. Oper. Res. 64(6):1499–1514.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Glynn P, Juneja S (2004) A large deviations perspective on ordinal optimization. Ingalls RG, Rossetti MD, Smith JS, Peters BA, eds. Proc. 2004 Winter Simulation Conf. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ), 565–573.Google Scholar
  • Hanley JT (2018) Using game theory to identify opportunities for deception during course of action analysis and comparison. Presentation, 86th Military Operations Research Society Symposium, June 21, Military Operations Research Society, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
  • Harsanyi J (1967) Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, part I: the basic model. Management Sci. 14(3):159–182.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harsanyi J (1968a) Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, part II: Bayesian equilibrium points. Management Sci. 14(5):320–334.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harsanyi J (1968b) Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, part III: the basic probability distribution of the game. Management Sci. 14(7):486–502.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harsanyi JC (1982a) Comment—Subjective probability and the theory of games: Comments on Kadane and Larkey's paper. Management Sci. 28(2):120–124.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harsanyi JC (1982b) Rejoinder-Rejoinder to Professors Kadane and Larkey. Management Sci. 28(2):124–125.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kadane JB, Larkey PD (1982a) Subjective probability and the theory of games. Management Sci. 28(2):113–120.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kadane JB, Larkey PD (1982b) Reply-Reply to Professor Harsanyi. Management Sci. 28(2):124.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kadane JB, Polson N, Banks DL, Petralia F, Wang S (2011) Adversarial risk analysis: Borel games. Discussions and rejoinder between Kadane, Polson, and Banks, et al. App. Stochastic Models Bus. Indust. 27(2):87–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiss HJ, Rodríguez-Lara I, Rosa-García A (2017) Overthrowing the dictator: A game-theoretic approach to revolutions and media. Soc. Choice Welfare 49(2):329–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koller D, Milch B (2003) Multi-agent influence diagrams for representing and solving games. Games Econom. Behav. 45(1):181–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kovenock D, Roberson B (2012) Coalitional Colonel Blotto games with application to the economics of alliances. J. Public Econom. Theory 14(4):653–676.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lapan HE, Sandler T (1988) To bargain or not to bargain: That is the question. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(2):16–21.Google Scholar
  • Liang X, Xiao Y (2013) Game theory for network security. IEEE Comm. Surveys Tutorials 15(1):472–486.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin K, Dayton J (2011) Game-theoretic models for jamming radio-controlled improvised explosive devices. Military Oper. Res. 16(3):5–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McLay L, Rothschild C, Guikema S (2012) Robust adversarial risk analysis: A level-k approach. Decision Anal. 9(1):41–54.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nikoofal ME, Zhuang J (2012) Robust allocation of a defensive budget considering an attacker’s private information: Robust allocation of a defensive budget. Risk Anal. 32(5):930–943.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng Y, Chen CH, Fu MC, Hu JQ (2016) Dynamic sampling allocation and design selection. INFORMS J. Comput. 28(2):195–208.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rios J, Ríos Insua D (2012) Adversarial risk analysis for counterterrorism modeling. Risk Anal. 32(5):894–915.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ríos Insua D, Rios J, Banks DL (2009) Adversarial risk analysis. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 104(486):841–854.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sevillano JC, Ríos Insua D, Rios J (2012) Adversarial risk analysis: The Somali pirates case. Decision Anal. 9(2):86–95.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Neumann J (1928) Zur Theorie der Gesellschaftsspiele. Mathematische Annalen 100(1):295–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang C, Bier VM (2011) Target-hardening decisions based on uncertain multiattribute terrorist utility. Decision Anal. 8(4):286–302.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang S, Banks DL (2011) Network routing for insurgency: An adversarial risk analysis framework. Naval Res. Logist. 58(6):595–607.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson EB (1927) Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 22(158):209–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu J, Zhang S, Huang E, Chen CH, Lee LH, Celik N (2016) Multi-fidelity optimization with ordinal transformation and optimal sampling. Asia-Pacific J. Oper. Res. 33(3):1650017:1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhuang J, Bier VM (2007) Balancing terrorism and natural disasters—Defensive strategy with endogenous attacker effort. Oper. Res. 55(5):976–991.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.