Valuing Sequences of Lives Lost or Saved Over Time: Preference for Uniform Sequences

References

• Ahlbrecht M, Weber M (1997) An empirical study on intertemporal decision making under risk. Management Sci. 43(6):813–826.Link, Google Scholar
• Attema A, Bleichrodt H, L’Haridon O, Peretti-Watel P, Seror V (2018) Discounting health and money: New evidence using a more robust method. J. Risk Uncertainty 56(2):117–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benzion U, Rapoport A, Yagil J (1989) Discount rates inferred from decisions: An experimental study. Management Sci. 35(3):270–284.Link, Google Scholar
• Baron J, Greene J (1996) Determinants of insensitivity to quantity in valuation of public goods: Contribution, warm glow, budget constraints, availability, and prominence. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 2(2):107–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman GB (1996) Expectations and preferences for sequences of health and money. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 67(1):59–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman GB, Elstein ES (1995) Valuing the future: Temporal discounting of health and money. Medical Decision Making 15(4):373–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemen RT, Reilly T (2014) Making Hard Decisions with Decision Tools Suite, 3rd ed. (Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA).Google Scholar
• Cropper ML, Aydede SK, Portney PR (1992) Rates of time preference for saving lives. Amer. Econom. Rev. 82(2):469–472.Google Scholar
• Eddy DM (1980) Screening for Cancer: Theory, Analysis and Design (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Fishburn PC, Rubenstein A (1982) Time preference. Internat. Econom. Rev. 23(3):677–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S (2003) Measuring intergenerational time preference: Are future lives valued less? J. Risk Uncertainty 26(1):39–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S, Loewenstein G (2008) Conflicting motives in evaluations of sequences. J. Risk Uncertainty 37(2):221–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J. Econom. Literature 40(2):351–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenhouse SW, Geisser S (1959) On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24(2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guyse JL, Simon J (2011) Consistency among elicitation techniques for intertemporal choice: A within-subjects investigation of the anomalies. Decision Anal. 8(3):233–246.Link, Google Scholar
• Guyse JL, Keller LR, Eppel T (2002) Valuing environmental outcomes: Preferences for uniform or improving sequences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 87(2):253–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horowitz JK, Carson RT (1990) Discounting statistical lives. J. Risk Uncertainty 3(4):403–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Ritov I, Schkade D (1999) Economic preferences or attitude expressions? An analysis of dollar responses to public issues. J. Risk Uncertainty 19(1–3):203–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeler EB, Cretin S (1983) Discounting of life-saving and other nonmonetary effects. Management Sci. 29(3):300–306.Link, Google Scholar
• Kirby KN, Marakovic NN (1995) Modeling myopic decisions: Evidence for hyperbolic delay-discounting within subjects and amounts. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 64(1):22–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klarman HE, Francis JD, Rosenthal GD (1968) Cost-effectiveness analysis applied to the treatment of chronic renal disease. Medical Care 6:48–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koopmans TC (1960) Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28(2):287–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G (1988) Frames of mind in intertemporal choice. Management Sci. 34(2):200–214.Link, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Elster J, eds. (1992) Choice Over Time (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Prelec D (1991) Negative time preference. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(2):347–352.Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Prelec D (1992) Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and interpretations. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):573–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Prelec D (1993) Preference for sequences of outcomes. Psych. Rev. 100(1):91–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Sicherman N (1991) Do workers prefer increasing wage profiles? J. Labor Econom. 9(1):67–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mauchly JW (1940) Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution. Ann. Math. Statist. 11(2):204–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (1999) Doing it now or later. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):103–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D, Loewenstein G (1991) Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Sci. 37(7):770–786.Link, Google Scholar
• Read D, Powell M (2002) Reasons for sequence preferences. J. Behav. Decision Making 15(5):433–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, Loewenstein G, Kalyanaraman S (1999) Mixing virtue and vice: Combining the immediacy effect and the diversification bias. J. Behav. Decision Making 12(4):257–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth CA, Ing RT, Ross DA (1978) Therapy for end-stage renal-disease. New England J. Medicine 298:1085–1088.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson PA (1937) A note on measurement of utility. Rev. Econom. Stud. 4(2):155–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitt DR, Kemper TD (1996) Preference for different sequences of increasing or decreasing rewards. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 66(1):89–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shelley MK (1993) Outcome signs, question frames and discount rates. Management Sci. 39(7):806–815.Link, Google Scholar
• Stevenson MK (1992) The impact of temporal context and risk on the judged value of future outcomes. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 52(3):455–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH (1981) Some empirical evidence on dynamic consistency. Econom. Lett. 8(3):201–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber BJ, Chapman GB (2005) The combined effects of risk and time on choice: Does uncertainty eliminate the immediacy effect? Does delay eliminate the certainty effect? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96(2):104–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu G (1999) Anxiety and decision making with delayed resolution of uncertainty. Theory Decision 46(2):159–199.Crossref, Google Scholar