A Review of Probabilistic Opinion Pooling Algorithms with Application to Insider Threat Detection
Published Online:19 Feb 2020https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2019.0399
References
- (2012) Probability aggregation methods in geoscience. Math. Geosci. 44(5):545–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) A Bayesian network model for predicting insider threats. IEEE SPW Workshop on Research for Insider Threat (WRIT), San Francisco, CA, 82–89.Google Scholar
- (1979) Normal Bayesian dialogues. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 74:837–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Two reasons to make aggregated probability forecasts more extreme. Decision Anal. 11(2):133–145.Link, Google Scholar
- (1969) The combination of forecasts. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 20(4):451–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) A multiplicative formula for aggregating probability assessments. Management Sci. 28(10):1137–1148.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Inference enterprise models: An approach to organizational performance improvement. WIREs Data Mining Knowledge Discovery 8(6):e1277.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) An overview of applications of proper scoring rules. Decision Anal. 13(4):223–242.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Information markets vs. opinion pools: An empirical comparison. Proc. 6th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 58–67.Google Scholar
- (2011) Probability aggregation methods and multiple-point statistics for 3D modeling of aquifer heterogeneity from 2D training images. Doctoral thesis, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- (2006) An empirical comparison of algorithms for aggregating expert predictions. Proc. 22nd Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (AUAI Press, Arlington, VA).Google Scholar
- (2016) Probabilistic opinion pooling. The Oxford Handbook of Probability and Philosophy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
- (2016) Testing best practices to reduce the overconfidence bias in multi-criteria decision analysis. Proc. 49th Hawaii Internat. Conf. Systems Sci. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2017) Combining interval forecasts. Decision Anal. 14(1):1–74.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Combining predictive distributions. Electronic J. Stat. 7 (2013):1747–1782.Google Scholar
- (2007) Probabilistic forecasts, calibration and sharpness. J. Roy. Statist. Soc.: Ser. B 69:243–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) How to compute a mean? The Chisini approach and its applications. Amer. Statist. 63(1):33–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) SOFIT: Sociotechnical and organizational factors for insider threat. 39th IEEE Sympos. Security Privacy, Workshop on Research for Insider Threat (WRIT), San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
- (2013) Probabilistic coherence weighting for optimizing expert forecasts. Decision Anal. 10(4):305–326.Link, Google Scholar
- (1814 [1951]) A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. Trans. Truscott FW, Emery FL (Dover Publications, New York).Google Scholar
- (2013) The Recalibrated and Copula Opinion Pools (Warwick Business School, Coventry, UK).Google Scholar
- (2010) Combining probability forecasts. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B. 72(1):71–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Intelligence analysis and insider threat. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics Part A: Systems Humans 42:331–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Combining multiple probability predictions using a simple logit model. Internat. J. Forecast 30(2):344–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Processing events in probabilistic risk assessment. 9th Internat. Conf. Semantic Tech. Intelligence Defense Security (STIDS), Fairfax, VA.Google Scholar
- (1961) The linear pool. Ann. Math. Statist. 32:1339–1342.Crossref, Google Scholar
- United States Department of Homeland Security (2014) Combating the insider threat. Accessed March 13, 2013, https://www.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/publications.Google Scholar
- (1996) Scoring rules and the evaluation of probabilities. Test 5(1):1–60.Crossref, Google Scholar

