From the Editors: Decision Analysis Focus and Trends

References

• Abbas AE, Sun Z (2019) Archimedean utility copulas with polynomial generating functions. Decision Anal. 16(3):218–237.Link, Google Scholar
• Alagoz O, Chhatwal J, Burnside ES (2013) Optimal policies for reducing unnecessary follow-up mammography exams in breast cancer diagnosis. Decision Anal. 10(3):200–224.Link, Google Scholar
• Allen TT, Sui Z, Parker NL (2017) Timely decision analysis enabled by efficient social media modeling. Decision Anal. 14(4):250–260.Link, Google Scholar
• Bagchi A, Bandyopadhyay T (2018) Role of intelligence inputs in defending against cyber warfare and cyberterrorism. Decision Anal. 15(3):174–193.Link, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Bleichrodt H, Keskin U, l’Haridon O, Li C (2018). Management Sci. 64(5):2181–2198.Link, Google Scholar
• Bansal S, Rosokha Y (2018) Impact of compound and reduced specification on valuation of projects with multiple risks. Decision Anal. 15(1):27–46.Link, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Sarin RK (2019) The myopic property in decision models. Decision Anal. 16(2):128–141.Link, Google Scholar
• Bell DE (1983) Risk premiums for decision regret. Management Sci. 29(10):1156–1166.Link, Google Scholar
• Bickel JE (2010) Scoring rules and decision analysis education. Decision Anal. 7(4):346–357.Link, Google Scholar
• Bigsby KG, Ohlmann JW, Zhao K (2017) Online and off the field: Predicting school choice in college football recruiting from social media data. Decision Anal. 14(4):261–273.Link, Google Scholar
• Bodily SE (2016) Reducing risk and improving incentives in funding entrepreneurs. Decision Anal. 13(2):101–116.Link, Google Scholar
• Bodily SE, Furman B (2016) Long-term care insurance decisions. Decision Anal. 13(3):173–191.Link, Google Scholar
• Bogaert M, Ballings M, Hosten M, Van den Poel D (2017) Identifying soccer players on Facebook through predictive analytics. Decision Anal. 14(4):274–297.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown R (2005) Rational Choice and Judgment: Decision Analysis for the Decider (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemen RT, Reilly T (2013) Making Hard Decisions with Decision Tools, 3rd ed. (Cengage, Boston).Google Scholar
• Cordes H, Foltice B, Langer T (2019) Misperception of exponential growth: Are people aware of their errors? Decision Anal. 16(4):261–280.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Cox LA Jr, ed. (2015) Breakthroughs in Decision Science and Risk Analysis (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Daley B, Wang R (2018) When to release feedback in a dynamic tournament. Decision Anal. 15(1):11–26.Link, Google Scholar
• De Icaza RR, Parnell GS, Pohl EA (2019) Gulf Coast port selection using multiple-objective decision analysis. Decision Anal. 16(2):87–104.Link, Google Scholar
• Desmoulins-Lebeault F, Meunier L (2018) Moment risks: Investment for self and for a firm. Decision Anal. 15(4):242–266.Link, Google Scholar
• Deutsch Y, Golany B (2019) Securing gates of a protected area: A hybrid game and queueing theory modeling approach. Decision Anal. 16(1):31–45.Link, Google Scholar
• Dillon RL, Burns WJ, John RS (2018) Insights for critical alarm-based warning systems from a risk analysis of commercial aviation passenger screening. Decision Anal. 15(3):154–173.Link, Google Scholar
• Dyer JS (1990) Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Sci. 36(3):249–258.Link, Google Scholar
• Edwards W (1954) The theory of decision making. Psych. Bull. 51(4):380–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards W, Miles RF Jr, von Winterfeldt D (2007) Advances in Decision Analysis: From Foundations to Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Budescu DV, Mandel D, Himmelstein M (2019) Improving accuracy by coherence weighting of direct and ratio probability judgments. Decision Anal. 16(3):197–217.Link, Google Scholar
• Fischer GW (1995) Range sensitivity of attribute weights in multi-attribute value models. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 62(3):252–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• French S, Argyris K (2018) Decision analysis and political processes. Decision Anal. 15(4):208–222.Link, Google Scholar
• French S, Maule AJ, Papamichail KN (2009) Decision Behaviour, Analysis and Support (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goethals PL, Scala NM (2018) Eliminating the weakest link approach to army unit readiness. Decision Anal. 15(2):110–130.Link, Google Scholar
• Grant A, Johnstone D, Kwon OK (2019) A probability scoring rule for simultaneous events. Decision Anal. 16(4):301–313.Link, Google Scholar
• Gregory RS, Failing L, Harstone M, Long G, McDaniels T, Ohlson D (2013) Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices (Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Guan P, Zhang J, Payyappalli VM, Zhuang J (2018) Modeling and validating public–private partnerships in disaster management. Decision Anal. 15(2):55–71.Link, Google Scholar
• Hadlock CC, Bickel JE (2019) The generalized Johnson quantile-parameterized distribution system. Decision Anal. 16(1):67–85.Link, Google Scholar
• Hausken K (2019) Principal–agent theory, game theory, and the precautionary principle. Decision Anal. 16(2):105–127.Link, Google Scholar
• Hounwanou DD (2018) Participation costs and inefficiency in takeover contests. Decision Anal. 15(1):1–10.Link, Google Scholar
• Howard RA (1988) Decision analysis: Practice and promise. Management Sci. 34(6):679–695.Link, Google Scholar
• Howard RA, Abbas AE (2015) Foundations of Decision Analysis (Pearson, New York).Google Scholar
• Huang T, Bickel JE (2019) Sparse probability assessment heuristic based on orthogonal matching pursuit. Decision Anal. 16(4):281–300.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Penguin, London).Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karimi M, Dimitrov S (2018) On the road to making science of “art”: Risk bias in market scoring rules. Decision Anal. 15(2):72–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL (2002) Common mistakes in making value trade-offs. Oper. Res. 50(6):935–945.Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL (2009) Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Keeney RL (2013) Foundations for group decision analysis. Decision Anal. 10(2):103–120.Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preference and Value Trade-Offs (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Khoroshilov Y (2018) Partnership dissolution: Information and efficiency. Decision Anal. 15(3):133–138.Link, Google Scholar
• Kusumastuti S, Rosoff H, John RS (2019) Characterizing conflicting user values for cyber authentication using a virtual public values forum. Decision Anal. 16(3):157–171.Link, Google Scholar
• Kvam PH (2018) A probability model for strategic bidding on “The Price Is Right.” Decision Anal. 15(4):195–207.Link, Google Scholar
• Li Z, Muller J, Wakker PP, Wang TV (2018) The rich domain of ambiguity explored. Management Sci. 64(7):3227–3240.Link, Google Scholar
• Mai B, Kulkarni S (2018) When hackers err: The impacts of false positives on information security games. Decision Anal. 15(2):90–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Meeker D, Thompson C, Strylewicz G, Knight TK, Doctor JN (2015) Use of insurance against a small loss as an incentive strategy. Decision Anal. 12(3):122–129.Link, Google Scholar
• Metel MR (2018) Kelly betting on horse races with uncertainty in probability estimates. Decision Anal. 15(1):47–52.Link, Google Scholar
• Nohdurft E, Long E, Spinler S (2017) Was Angelina Jolie right? Optimizing cancer prevention strategies among BRCA mutation carriers. Decision Anal. 14(3):139–169.Link, Google Scholar
• Pala A, Zhuang J (2019) Information sharing in cybersecurity: A review. Decision Anal. 16(3):172–196.Link, Google Scholar
• Perry M, El-Amine H (2019) Computational efficiency in multivariate adversarial risk analysis models. Decision Anal. 16(4):314–332.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Phade SR, Anantharam V (2019) On the geometry of Nash and correlated equilibria with cumulative prospect theoretic preferences. Decision Anal. 16(2):142–156.Link, Google Scholar
• Raiffa H (1968) Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choice Under Uncertainty (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Ramsey FP (1931) Truth and probability (1926). Braithwaite RB, ed. The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London), 156–198.Google Scholar
• Rathore AK, Kar AK, Ilavarasan PV (2017) Social media analytics: Literature review and directions for future research. Decision Anal. 14(4):229–249.Link, Google Scholar
• Savage LJ (1972) The Foundations of Statistics (Dover, New York).Google Scholar
• Schneider M, Deck C, Shor M, Besedes T, Sarangi S (2019) Optimizing choice architectures. Decision Anal. 16(1):2–30.Link, Google Scholar
• Sivaprasad S, MacKenzie CA (2018) The Hurwicz decision rule’s relationship to decision making with the triangle and beta distributions and exponential utility. Decision Anal. 15(3):139–153.Link, Google Scholar
• Spetzler CS, Winter H, Meyer J (2016) Decision Quality: Value Creation from Better Business Decisions (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart N, Reimers S, Harris A (2015) On the origin of utility, weighting, and discounting functions: How they get their shapes and how to change their shapes. Management Sci. 61(3):687–705.Link, Google Scholar
• Taheri E, Wang C (2018) Eliciting public risk preferences in emergency situations. Decision Anal. 15(4):223–241.Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1986) Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J. Bus. 59(4):S251–S278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verly C, De Smet Y (2013) Some results about rank reversal instances in the PROMETHEE methods. Internat. J. Multicriteria Decision Making 3(4):325–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W (1986) Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Winkler RL, Grushka-Cockayne Y, Lichtendahl KC, Jose VRR (2019) Probability forecasts and their combination: A research perspective. Decision Anal. 16(4):239–260.Link, Google Scholar
• Yolmeh A, Baykal-Gursoy M (2019) Two-stage invest–defend game: Balancing strategic and operational decisions. Decision Anal. 16(1):46–66.Link, Google Scholar