Skills, Efficiency, and Timing in a Simple Attack and Defense Model
Published Online:2 Apr 2020https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2020.0409
References
- (2006) The economics of information security. Science 314(5799):610–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Sabotage in contests: A survey. Public Choice 164(1–2):135–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) The attack-and-defense group contests: Best shot vs. weakest link. Econom. Inquiry 54(1):548–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Asymmetric conflict: Weakest link against best shot. J. Conflict Resolution 51(3):457–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Object defence of a single object with preventive strike of random effect. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 186(June):209–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Strategic defense and attack for series and parallel reliability. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 186(2):856–881.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Defense and attack for interdependent systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 256(2):582–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Defense and attack models of complex interdependent systems. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 70(3):364–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Defending against multiple different attackers. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 211(2):370–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Review of systems defense and attack models. Internat. J. Performance Engrg. 8(4):355–366.Google Scholar
- (2007) A survey of attack and defense techniques for reputation systems. ACM Comput. Surveys 42(1):1–34.Google Scholar
- (2009) Strategy and Dynamics in Contests (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Attacking and defending multiple valuable secrets in a big data world. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 280(3):1122–1129.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The optimal defense of network of targets. Econom. Inquiry 56(4):2195–2211.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The attack and defense of weakest-link networks. Public Choice 179(3–4):175–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) False targets efficiency in defense strategy. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 194(1):155–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Resource distribution in multiple attacks against a single target. Risk Anal. 30(8):1231–1239.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Defending a parallel system against a strategic attacker with redundancy, protection and disinformation. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 193:106651.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) A game theoretic approach to modelling attacks and defenses of smart grids at three levels. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 195:106683.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Cybersecurity investments in the supply chain: Coordination and a strategic attacker. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 282(1):161–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) System reliability and free riding. Camp J, Lewis S, eds. Economics of Information Security, vol. 12 (Springer, Boston), 1–15.Google Scholar
- (2016) Contest Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
- (2019) System survivability in the context of interdiction networks. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 185(May):362–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Two-stage invest-defend game: Balancing strategic and operational decisions. Decision Anal. 16(1):46–66.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Optimal defence-attack strategies between one defender and two attackers. J. Oper. Res. Soc., ePub ahead of print July 13, https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1630332.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Defending a single object in a defender-attacker game considering time. IEEE Internat. Conf. Systems, Man Cybernetics (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2019) Defender-attacker games with asymmetric player utilities. Risk Anal. 40(2):408–420. Google Scholar
- (2019) A study on a sequential one-defender-N-attacker game. Risk Anal. 39(6):1414–1432.Crossref, Google Scholar

