Using Value-Focused Thinking and Multicriteria Decision Making to Evaluate Energy Transition Alternatives

References

• Abu Taha R, Daim T (2013) Multi-criteria applications in renewable energy analysis, a literature review. Daim T, Oliver T, Kim J, eds. Research and Technology Management in the Electricity Industry (Springer, London), 17–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alencar MH, Priori L Jr, Alencar LH (2017) Structuring objectives based on value-focused thinking methodology: Creating alternatives for sustainability in the built environment. J. Cleaner Production 156(s1):62–73.Google Scholar
• Angelis A, Kanavos P (2016) Value-based assessment of new medical technologies: Toward a robust methodological framework for the application of multiple criteria decision analysis in the context of health technology assessment. Pharmacoeconom. 34(5):435–446.Google Scholar
• Austin J, Mitchell IM (2008) Bringing value focused thinking to bear on equipment procurement. Military Oper. Res. 13(2):33–46.Google Scholar
• Baldwin E (2018) From regulation to governance in the electric sector. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Rep. 5:86–92.Google Scholar
• Barcus A, Montibeller G (2008) Supporting the allocation of software development work in distributed teams with multi-criteria decision analysis. Omega 36(3):464–475.Google Scholar
• Becker W, Chinnis JC (2010) A community safety system balancing risk, cost and freedom. OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE Seattle (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ), 1–9.Google Scholar
• Bernardo H, Gaspar A, Henggeler Antunes C (2018) A combined value focused thinking-soft systems methodology approach to structure decision support for energy performance assessment of school buildings. Sustainability 10(7):2295.Google Scholar
• Bond SD, Carlson KA, Keeney RL (2008) Generating objectives: Can decision makers articulate what they want? Management Sci. 54(1):56–70.Google Scholar
• Cavalcanti LB, Mendes AB, Yoshizaki HTY (2017) Application of multi-attribute value theory to improve cargo delivery planning in disaster aftermath. Mathematical Problems Engrg. 2017(3):1–12.Google Scholar
• Coelho D, Antunes CH, Martins AG (2010) Using SSM for structuring decision support in urban energy planning. Tech. Econom. Development Econom. 16(4):641–653.Google Scholar
• de Haas M, Kleingeld A (1999) Multilevel design of performance measurement systems: Enhancing strategic dialogue throughout the organization. Management Accounting Res. 10(3):233–261.Google Scholar
• Dillon RL, Lester G, John RS, Tinsley CH (2012) Differentiating conflicts in beliefs vs. value tradeoffs in the domestic intelligence policy debate. Risk Anal. 32(4):713–728.Google Scholar
• Esteves AM (2008) Evaluating community investments in the mining sector using multi-criteria decision analysis to integrate SIA with business planning. Environ. Impact Assessment Rev. 28(4–5):338–348.Google Scholar
• NEP (2019) Netzentwicklungsplan Strom 2030, version 2019: Zweiter Entwurf der Übertragungsnetzbetreiber. Report, 50Hertz Transmission GmbH, Berlin; Amprion GmbH, Dortmund; TenneT TSO GmbH, Bayreuth; and TransnetBW GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
• Georgopoulou E, Sarafidis Y, Diakoulaki D (1998) Design and implementation of a group DSS for sustaining renewable energies exploitation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 109(2):483–500.Google Scholar
• Goletsis Y (2003) Project ranking in the Armenian energy sector using a multicriteria method for groups. Ann. Oper. Res. 120(1–4):135–157.Google Scholar
• Hahn WJ (2015) Making decisions with multiple criteria: A case in energy sustainability planning. EURO J. Decision Processes 3(1):161–185.Google Scholar
• Hänlein R, El-Alaoui A (2015) Public participation and transparency in power grid planning. Report, Germanwatch Nord-Süd Initiative e.V., Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Haralambopoulos DA, Polatidis H (2003) Renewable energy projects: Structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework. Renewable Energy 28(6):961–973.Google Scholar
• Haydt G, Leal V, Dias L (2013) Uncovering the multiple objectives behind national energy efficiency planning. Energy Policy 54(March):230–239.Google Scholar
• Henseling C, Evers-Wölk M, Oertel B, Opielka M, Kahlisch C (2016) Ausbau der Stromnetze im Rahmen der Energiewende: Stakeholder panel TA. Report, Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
• Joas F, Pahle M, Flachsland C, Joas A (2016) Which goals are driving the Energiewende? Making sense of the German energy transformation. Energy Policy 95(August):42–51.Google Scholar
• Jurk DM, Chambal SP, Thal AE (2004) Using value-focused thinking to select innovative force protection ideas. Military Oper. Res. 9(3):31–43.Google Scholar
• Kahraman C, Engin O, Kabak Ö, Kaya İ (2009) Information systems outsourcing decisions using a group decision-making approach. Engrg. Appl. Artificial Intelligence 22(6):832–841.Google Scholar
• Kajanus M, Kangas J, Kurttila M (2004) The use of value focused thinking and the A’WOT hybrid method in tourism management. Tourism Management 25(4):499–506.Google Scholar
• Karjalainen TP, Marttunen M, Sarkki S, Rytkönen AM (2013) Integrating ecosystem services into environmental impact assessment: An analytic–deliberative approach. Environ. Impact Assessment Rev. 40(April):54–64.Google Scholar
• Keeney RL (1982) Decision analysis: An overview. Oper. Res. 30(5):803–838.Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL (1992) Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Keeney RL (2012) Value-focused brainstorming. Decision Anal. 9(4):303–313.Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Renn O, von Winterfeldt D (1987) Structuring West Germany’s energy objectives. Energy Policy 15(4):352–362.Google Scholar
• Klein SJ, Whalley S (2015) Comparing the sustainability of U.S. electricity options through multi-criteria decision analysis. Energy Policy 79(April):127–149.Google Scholar
• Kowalski K, Stagl S, Madlener R, Omann I (2009) Sustainable energy futures: Methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 197(3):1063–1074.Google Scholar
• Kreitner R, Cassidy C (2011) Management, 12th ed. (South-Western Cengage, Mason, OH).Google Scholar
• Kühne O, Weber F (2016) Zur sozialen Akzeptanz der Energiewende. uwf UmweltWirtschaftsForum 24(2–3):207–213.Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Sah B, Singh AR, Deng Y, He X, Kumar P, Bansal RC (2017) A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) toward sustainable renewable energy development. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 69(March):596–609.Google Scholar
• Lootsma FA, Boonekamp P, Cooke RM, van Oostvoorn F (1990) Choice of a long-term strategy for the national electricity supply via scenario analysis and multi-criteria analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48(2):189–203.Google Scholar
• Madlener R, Kowalski K, Stagl S (2007) New ways for the integrated appraisal of national energy scenarios: The case of renewable energy use in Austria. Energy Policy 35(12):6060–6074.Google Scholar
• Mardani A, Jusoh A, Zavadskas E, Cavallaro F, Khalifah Z (2015) Sustainable and renewable energy: An overview of the application of multiple criteria decision making techniques and approaches. Sustainability 7(10):13947–13984.Google Scholar
• Mastorakis K, Siskos E (2016) Value focused pharmaceutical strategy determination with multicriteria decision analysis techniques. Omega 59(March):84–96.Google Scholar
• Mateus R, Ferreira JA, Carreira J (2008) Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA): Central Porto high-speed railway station. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 187(1):1–18.Google Scholar
• Maxim A (2014) Sustainability assessment of electricity generation technologies using weighted multi-criteria decision analysis. Energy Policy 65(February):284–297.Google Scholar
• Montibeller G, Gummer H, Tumidei D (2006) Combining scenario planning and multi-criteria decision analysis in practice. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. 14(1–3):5–20.Google Scholar
• Neves LP, Dias LC, Antunes CH, Martins AG (2009) Structuring an MCDA model using SSM: A case study in energy efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 199(3):834–845.Google Scholar
• Nock D, Baker E (2019) Holistic multi-criteria decision analysis evaluation of sustainable electric generation portfolios: New England case study. Applied Energy 242:655–673.Google Scholar
• Osborn AF (1963) Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem-Solving, 3rd ed. (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Osei-Bryson KM (2012) A context-aware data mining process model based framework for supporting evaluation of data mining results. Expert Systems Appl. 39(1):1156–1164.Google Scholar
• Ossadnik W, Schinke S, Kaspar RH (2016) Group aggregation techniques for analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: A comparative analysis. Group Decision Negotiation 25(2):421–457.Google Scholar
• Pamučar D (2015) Development of an integrated transport system in distribution centres: A FA’WOT analysis. Tehnicki vjesnik Technical Gazette 22(3):649–658.Google Scholar
• Parnell GS, Hughes DW, Burk RC, Driscoll PJ, Kucik PD, Morales BL, Nunn LR (2013) Invited review-survey of value-focused thinking: Applications, research developments and areas for future research. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. 20(1–2):49–60.Google Scholar
• Phillips LD (2017) Best practice for MCDA in healthcare. Marsh K, Goetghebeur M, Thokala P, Baltussen R, eds. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Support Healthcare Decisions, vol. 11 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 311–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raiffa H (1970) Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty, Behavioral Science Quantitative Methods, ed. 2 (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Schweizer PJ, Bovet J (2016) The potential of public participation to facilitate infrastructure decision-making: Lessons from the German and European legal planning system for electricity grid expansion. Utilities Policy 42(October):64–73.Google Scholar
• Seebach D, Timpe C (2019) Mögliche Pfade der Energiewende bis 2030—Im Rahmen des Kopernikus-Projekts ENSURE entwickelte Storylines. Report, Öko-Institut e.V., Freiburg, Germany.Google Scholar
• Simon J, Regnier E, Whitney L (2014) A value-focused approach to energy transformation in the United States Department of Defense. Decision Anal. 11(2):117–132.Google Scholar
• Sims RR (2002) Managing Organizational Behavior (Quorum Books, Westport, CT).Google Scholar
• Sodenkamp MA, Suhl L (2014) A multi-criteria vendor selection and order allocation GDSS using a mixed alternative and value focused thinking approach. Tavana M, ed. Analytical Approaches to Strategic Decision-Making, Advances in Business Information Systems and Analytics, vol. 22 (IGI Global, Hershey, PA),108–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stagl S (2006) Multicriteria evaluation and public participation: The case of UK energy policy. Land Use Policy 23(1):53–62.Google Scholar
• Sundberg L, Gidlund KL (2017) Value-based decision making: Decision theory meets e-government. Janssen M, Axelsson K, Glassey O, Klievink B, Krimmer R, Lindgren I, eds. Electronic Government, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Information Systems and Applications, vol. 10428 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 351–358.Google Scholar
• von Nitzsch R (2017) Entscheidungslehre: Wie Menschen entscheiden und wie sie entscheiden sollten, ed. 9 (Druck und Verlagshaus Mainz GmbH, Aachen, Germany).Google Scholar
• Xu Z (2009) An automatic approach to reaching consensus in multiple attribute group decision making. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 56(4):1369–1374.Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Auriol G, Eres H, Baron C (2013) A prescriptive approach to qualify and quantify customer value for value-based requirements engineering. Internat. J. Comput. Integrated Manufacturing 26(4):327–345.Google Scholar