Stochastic Superiority Equilibrium in Game Theory

References

• Agarwal P, Hunt K, Srinivasan S, Zhuang J (2020) Fire code inspection and compliance: A game-theoretic model between fire inspection agencies and building owners. Decision Anal. 17(3):208–226.Link, Google Scholar
• Angelidakis H, Fotakis D, Lianeas T (2013) Stochastic congestion games with risk-averse players. Vöcking B, ed. Algorithmic Game Theory (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 86–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baele L, Driessen J, Ebert S, Londono JM, Spalt OG (2018) Cumulative prospect theory, option returns, and the variance premium. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(9):3667–3723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagchi A, Bandyopadhyay T (2018) Role of intelligence inputs in defending against cyber warfare and cyberterrorism. Decision Anal. 15(3):174–193.Link, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Huang M, Santos T (2001) Prospect theory and asset prices. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):1–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Mukherjee A, Wang B (2016) Prospect theory and stock returns: An empirical test. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(11):3068–3107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell MG, Cassir C (2002) Risk-averse user equilibrium traffic assignment: An application of game theory. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 36(8):671–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlsson JG, Delage E (2013) Robust partitioning for stochastic multivehicle routing. Oper. Res. 61(3):727–744.Link, Google Scholar
• Cavusoglu H, Raghunathan S (2004) Configuration of detection software: A comparison of decision and game theory approaches. Decision Anal. 1(3):131–148.Link, Google Scholar
• Delage E, Iancu DA (2015) Robust multistage decision making. Aleman DM, Thiele AC, eds. The Operations Research Revolution, INFORMS TutORials in Operations Research (INFORMS, Catonsville, MD), 20–46Link, Google Scholar
• Delage E, Ye Y (2010) Distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems. Oper. Res. 58(3):595–612.Link, Google Scholar
• Downs A (1957) An economic theory of political action in a democracy. J. Political Econom. 65(2):135–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao X, Zhong W, Mei S (2013) Information security investment when hackers disseminate knowledge. Decision Anal. 10(4):352–368.Link, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Rajan U (2006) The economic impact of regulatory informationdisclosure on information security investments, competition, and social welfare. Workshop Econom. Inform. Security (WEIS), Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
• Goeree JK, Holt CA, Palfrey TR (2003) Risk averse behavior in generalized matching pennies games. Games Econom. Behav. 45(1):97–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guan P, He M, Zhuang J, Hora SC (2017) Modeling a multitarget attacker–defender game with budget constraints. Decision Anal. 14(2):87–107.Link, Google Scholar
• Harrington JE (1986) A non-cooperative bargaining game with risk averse players and an uncertain finite horizon. Econom. Lett. 20(1):9–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC (1967) Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players. Management Sci. 14(3):159–182.Link, Google Scholar
• Hausken K, Zhuang J (2011) Governments’ and terrorists’ defense and attack in a t-period game. Decision Anal. 8(1):46–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaggle (2017) New York stock exchange data set. Accessed March 1, 2021, https://www.kaggle.com/dgawlik/nyse.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keskin K (2016) Equilibrium notions for agents with cumulative prospect theory preferences. Decision Anal. 13(3):192–208.Link, Google Scholar
• Lejeune MA (2012) Game theoretical approach for reliable enhanced indexation. Decision Anal. 9(2):146–155.Link, Google Scholar
• Levy JS (1992) An introduction to prospect theory. Political Psych. 13(2):171–186.Google Scholar
• List JA (2004) Neoclassical theory vs. prospect theory: Evidence from the marketplace. Econometrica 72(2):615–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mertikopoulos P, Zhou Z (2019) Learning in games with continuous action sets and unknown payoff functions. Math. Programming 173(1):465–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nash JF (1950) Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 36(1):48–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nizovtsev D, Thursby M (2007) To disclose or not? An analysis of software user behavior. Inform. Econom. Policy 19(1):43–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pala A, Zhuang J (2019) Information sharing in cybersecurity: A review. Decision Anal. 16(3):172–196.Link, Google Scholar
• Phade SR, Anantharam V (2019) On the geometry of Nash and correlated equilibria with cumulative prospect theoretic preferences. Decision Anal. 16(2):142–156.Link, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2:21–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shan X, Zhuang J (2014a) Modeling credible retaliation threats in deterring the smuggling of nuclear weapons using partial inspection: A three-stage game. Decision Anal. 11(1):43–62.Link, Google Scholar
• Shan XG, Zhuang J (2014b) Modeling credible retaliation threats in deterring the smuggling of nuclear weapons using partial inspection: A three-stage game. Decision Anal. 11(1):43–62.Link, Google Scholar
• Sugaya T, Yamamoto Y (2020) Common learning and cooperation in repeated games. Theoret. Econom. 15(3):1175–1219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Binsbergen JH, Marx LM (2007) Exploring relations between decision analysis and game theory. Decision Anal. 4(1):32–40.Link, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J (1928) Zur theorie der gesellschaftsspiele. Math. Ann. 100(1):295–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Wiseman T (2005) A partial folk theorem for games with unknown payoff distributions. Econometrica 73(2):629–645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yamazaki T (2009) The uniqueness of pure-strategy Nash equilibrium in rent-seeking games with risk-averse players. Public Choice 139(3/4):335–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yekkehkhany A, Nagi R (2020) Risk-averse equilibrium for autonomous vehicles in stochastic congestion games. Preprint, submitted July 19, https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.09771.Google Scholar
• Yekkehkhany A, Arian E, Hajiesmaili M, Nagi R (2019) Risk-averse explore-then-commit algorithms for finite-time bandits. IEEE 58th Conf. Decision Control (CDC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 8441–8446.Google Scholar
• Yekkehkhany A, Arian E, Nagi R, Shomorony I (2021) A cost-based analysis for risk-averse explore-then-commit finite-time bandits. IISE Trans., ePub ahead of print February 2, https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2021.1882014.Google Scholar
• Yolmeh A, Baykal-Gürsoy M (2019) Two-stage invest–defend game: Balancing strategic and operational decisions. Decision Anal. 16(1):46–66.Link, Google Scholar