Statistical Process Control for the Number of Defectives with Limited Memory

References

• Calabrese JM (1995) Bayesian process control for attributes. Management Sci. 41(4):637–645.Link, Google Scholar
• Carter PL (1972) A Bayesian approach to quality control. Management Sci. 18(11):647–655.Link, Google Scholar
• Cassandra A (2015) pomdp-solve: POMDP solver software. Accessed August 3, 2020, http://www.pomdp.org.Google Scholar
• Cassandra A, Littman ML, Zhang N (1997) Incremental pruning: a simple, fast, exact method for partially observable Markov decision processes. Geiger D, Shenoy PP, eds. Proc. 13th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco), 54–61.Google Scholar
• Cobb BR, Li L (2018) Bayesian networks for statistical process control with attribute data. Internat. J. Quality Reliability Management 36(2):232–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cobb BR, Li L (2019) Bayesian network model for quality control with categorical attribute data. Appl. Soft Comput. 84(1):1–16.Google Scholar
• Cowell RG, Dawid AP, Lauritzen SL, Spiegelhalter DJ (1999) Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Epprecht EK, Costa AFB, Mendes FCT (2003) Adaptive control charts for attributes. IIE Trans. 35(6):567–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamada M (2002) Bayesian tolerance interval control limits for attributes. Quality Reliability Engrg. Internat. 18(1):45–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hovgaard MK, Brincker R (2016) Limited memory influence diagrams for structural damage detection decision-making. J. Civil Structural Health Monitoring 6(2):205–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard R, Matheson J (1984) Influence diagrams. Howard RA, Matheson JE, eds., Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis, vol. 2 (Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, CA), 719–762.Google Scholar
• Howard R, Matheson J (2005) Influence diagrams. Decision Anal. 2(3):127–143.Link, Google Scholar
• Khaled A, Hansen E, Yuan C (2013) Solving limited-memory influence diagrams using branch-and-bound search. Nicholson A, Smyth P, eds. Proc. 29th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (AUAI Press, Corvallis, OR), 331–340.Google Scholar
• Kooli I, Limam M (2011) Economic design of an attribute np control chart using a variable sample size. Sequential Anal. 30(2):145–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kooli I, Limam M (2015) Economic design of an attribute np control chart using a variable sampling policy. Appl. Stochastic Models Bus. Indust. 31(4):483–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lauritzen SL, Nilsson D (2001) Representing and solving decision problems with limited information. Management Sci. 47(9):1235–1251.Link, Google Scholar
• Mauá DD, de Campos CP, Zaffalon M (2010) Solving limited memory influence diagrams. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. 44(1):97–140.Google Scholar
• Nielsen JJ, Sørensen JD (2010) Bayesian networks as a decision tool for O&M of offshore wind turbines. ASRANet: Integrating Structural Analysis, Risk & Reliability: 5th International ASRANet Conference (ASRANet Ltd., Edinburgh, UK), 1–8.Google Scholar
• Olmsted SM (1983) On representing and solving decision problems. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Engineering-Economic Systems, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Panagiotidou S, Nenes G, Georgopoulos P (2020) A sequential monitoring Bayesian control chart scheme for attributes. Quality Tech. Quant. Management 17(1):108–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porteus EL, Angelus A (1997) Opportunities for improved statistical process control. Management Sci. 43(9):1214–1228.Link, Google Scholar
• Raubenheimer L, van der Merwe AJ (2015) Bayesian control chart for nonconformities. Quality Reliability Engrg. Internat. 31(8):1359–1366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shachter RD (1986) Evaluating influence diagrams. Oper. Res. 34(6):871–882.Link, Google Scholar
• Shewhart WA (1931) Economic Control of a Quality Manufactured Product (D. Van Nostrand, New York).Google Scholar
• Shiau JH, Chen C, Feltz CJ (2005) An empirical Bayes process monitoring technique for polytomous data. Quality Reliability Engrg. Internat. 21(1):13–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tagaras G (1994) A dynamic programming approach to the economic design of X¯ charts. IIE Trans. 26(3):48–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tagaras G (1996) Dynamic control charts for finite production runs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 91(1):38–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yousry MA, Sturm GW, Feltz CJ, Noorossana R (1991) Process monitoring in real time: Empirical Bayes approach—Discrete case. Quality Reliability Engrg. Internat. 7(3):123–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yuan C, Wu X, Hansen E (2010) Solving multistage influence diagrams using branch-and-bound search. Grünwald P, Spirtes P, eds. Proc. 26th Annual Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (AUAI Press, Corvallis, OR), 691–700.Google Scholar