Microfoundations of Discounting

References

• Berman Y, Kirstein M (2020) Risk preferences in time lotteries. Preprint, submitted February 15, https://researchers.one/articles/20.02.00007.Google Scholar
• Britto A, Dehler-Holland J, Fichtner W (2021) Optimal investment in energy efficiency as a problem of growth rate maximisation. Working Paper 56, Series in Production and Energy, Institute for Industrial Production, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe Germany.Google Scholar
• Carr P, Cherubini U (2020) Generalized compounding and growth optimal portfolios: Reconciling Kelly and Samuelson. Preprint, submitted March 9, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3529729.Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Marzilli Ericson K, Laibson D, White JM (2020) Measuring time preferences. J. Econom. Lit. 58(2):299–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P, Maskin E (2005) Uncertainty and hyperbolic discounting. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(4):1290–1299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epper T, Fehr E, Fehr-Duda H, Kreiner CT, Lassen DD, Leth-Petersen S, Rasmussen GN (2020) Time discounting and wealth inequality. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(4):1177–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S (2003) Measuring intergenerational time preference: Are future lives valued less? J. Risk Uncertainty 26(1):39–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T (2002) Discounting and time preference: A critical review. J. Econom. Lit. 40(2):351–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green L, Myerson J (1996) Exponential vs. hyperbolic discounting of delayed outcomes: Risk and waiting time. Amer. Zoologist 36(4):496–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green L, Myerson J, Lichtman D, Rosen S, Fry A (1996) Temporal discounting in choice between delayed rewards: The role of age and income. Psych. Aging 11(1):79–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guyse JL, Simon J (2011) Consistency among elicitation techniques for intertemporal choice: A within-subjects investigation of the anomalies. Decision Anal. 8(3):233–246.Link, Google Scholar
• Guyse JL, Keller LR, Huynh CH (2020) Valuing sequences of lives lost or saved over time: Preference for uniform sequences. Decision Anal. 17(1):24–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Holling CS (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Canadian Entomologist 91(7):385–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jevons WS (1863) A Serious Fall in the Value of Gold Ascertained, and Its Social Effects Set Forth (E. Stanford, London).Google Scholar
• Kacelnik A (1997) Normative and descriptive models of decision making: Time discounting and risk sensitivity. Bock GR, Cardew G, eds. Characterizing Human Psychological Adaptations (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK), 51–70.Google Scholar
• Keren G, Roelofsma P (1995) Immediacy and certainty in intertemporal choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes. 63(3):287–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):443–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtendahl KC Jr, Bodily SE (2012) Multiplicative utilities for health and consumption. Decision Anal. 9(4):314–328.Link, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Prelec D (1992) Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):573–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meder D, Rabe F, Morville T, Madsen KH, Koudahl MT, Dolan RJ, Siebner HR, Hulme OJ (2019) Ergodicity-breaking reveals time optimal economic behavior in humans. Preprint June 11, submitted, https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.04652.Google Scholar
• Myerson J, Green L (1995) Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice. J. Experiment. Anal. Behav. 64(3):263–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters O (2019) The ergodicity problem in economics. Nature Phys. 15:1216–1221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters O, Adamou A (2018) The time interpretation of expected utility theory. Preprint, submitted January 11, https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.03680.Google Scholar
• Peters O, Gell-Mann M (2016) Evaluating gambles using dynamics. Chaos 26:23103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D (2001) Is time-discounting hyperbolic or subadditive? J. Risk Uncertainty 23:5–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, Roelofsma PHMP (2003) Subadditive vs. hyperbolic discounting: A comparison of choice and matching. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 91(2):140–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson PA (1937) A note on measurement of utility. Rev. Econom. Stud. 4(2):155–161.Google Scholar
• Sozou PD (1998) On hyperbolic discounting and uncertain hazard rates. Proc. Biol. Sci. 265(1409):2015–2020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Yoon H (2020) Impatience and time inconsistency in discounting models. Management Sci. 66(12):5850–5860.Link, Google Scholar