Cognitive Stress and Learning Economic Order Quantity Inventory Management: An Experimental Investigation

References

• Abeler J, Jäger S (2015) Complex tax incentives. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 7(3):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allred S, Duffy S, Smith J (2016) Cognitive load and strategic sophistication. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 125(May):162–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bode C, Wagner SM (2015) Structural drivers of upstream supply chain complexity and the frequency of supply chain disruptions. J. Oper. Management 36(May):215–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Katok E (2008) Learning by doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(3):519–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Ho T-H (1999) Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica 67(4):827–874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caplin A, Dean M, Martin D (2011) Search and satisficing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(7):2899–2922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen K-Y, Wu D (2017) Learning under the deterministic economic order quantity problem. Technical report, University of Texas, Arlington.Google Scholar
• Chen DL, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016) oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9(March):88–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Donohue K, Katok E, Sterman J (2014) Order stability in supply chains: Coordination risk and the role of coordination stock. Production Oper. Management 23(2):176–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniel AM, Persson L, Sandorf ED (2018) Accounting for elimination-by-aspects strategies and demand management in electricity contract choice. Energy Econom. 73(C):80–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S (2018) The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deck C, Jahedi S (2015) The effect of cognitive load on economic decision making: A survey and new experiments. Eur. Econom. Rev. 78(August):97–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy S, Smith J (2014) Cognitive load in the multi-player prisoner’s dilemma game: Are there brains in games? J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 51(August):47–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fader PS, McAlister L (1990) An elimination by aspects model of consumer response to promotion calibrated on UPC scanner data. J. Marketing Res. 27(3):322–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng T, Keller LR, Zheng X (2011) Decision making in the newsvendor problem: A cross-national laboratory study. Omega 39(1):41–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gati I, Fassa N, Houminer D (1995) Applying decision theory to career counseling practice: The sequential elimination approach. Career Development Quart. 43(3):211–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guan D, Wang D, Hallegatte S, Davis SJ, Huo J, Li S, Bai Y, et al. (2020) Global supply chain effects of COVID-19 control measures. Nature Human Behav. 4(6):577–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinson JM, Jameson TL, Whitney P (2003) Impulsive decision making and working memory. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 29(2):298–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kato H, Kosuda K (2008) Elimination-by-aspects in urban rail demand analysis. Mao B, Tian Z, Huang H, Gao Z, eds. Proc. 6th Internat. Conf. Traffic Transportation Stud. (American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA), 165–176.Google Scholar
• Khaw MW, Stevens L, Woodford M (2017) Discrete adjustment to a changing environment: Experimental evidence. J. Monetary Econom. 91(November):88–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khraibani R, De Palma A, Picard N, Kaysi I (2016) A new evaluation and decision making framework investigating the elimination-by-aspects model in the context of transportation projects’ investment choices. Transport Policy 48(May):67–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Ghadami A, Drake JM, Rohani P, Epureanu BI (2021) Mathematical model of the feedback between global supply chain disruption and COVID-19 dynamics. Sci. Rep. 11(1):1–15.Google Scholar
• Lleras JS, Masatlioglu Y, Nakajima D, Ozbay EY (2017) When more is less: Limited consideration. J. Econom. Theory 170(July):70–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magnani J, Gorry A, Oprea R (2016) Time and state dependence in an SS decision experiment. Amer. Econom. J. Macroeconom. 8(1):285–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masatlioglu Y, Nakajima D, Ozbay EY (2012) Revealed attention. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(5):2183–2205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1980) Econometric models for probabilistic choice among products. J. Bus. 53(3):S13–S29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psych. Rev. 63(2):81–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan A, Moritz BB (2015) Decision making and cognition in multi-echelon supply chains: An experimental study. Production Oper. Management 24(8):1216–1234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niranjan TT, Wagner SM, Bode C (2011) An alternative theoretical explanation and empirical insights into overordering behavior in supply chains. Decision Sci. 42(4):859–888.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pan J, Shachat J, Wei S (2020) Cognitive reflection and economic order quantity inventory management: An experimental investigation. Management Decision Econom. 41(6):998–1009.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roch SG, Lane JA, Samuelson CD, Allison ST, Dent JL (2000) Cognitive load and the equality heuristic: A two-stage model of resource overconsumption in small groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 83(2):185–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruderman MN, Clerkin C, Deal JJ (2017) The long-hours culture. Cooper CL, Leiter MP, eds. The Routledge Companion to Wellbeing at Work (Routledge, London), 207–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz LB (1972) Economic order quantities for products with finite demand horizons. A I I E Trans. 4(3):234–237.Google Scholar
• Schweitzer ME, Cachon GP (2000) Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. 46(3):404–420.Link, Google Scholar
• Selten R, Stoecker R (1986) End behavior in sequences of finite prisoner’s dilemma supergames: A learning theory approach. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 7(1):47–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shachat J, Zhang Z (2017) The Hayek hypothesis and long-run competitive equilibrium: An experimental investigation. Econom. J. 127(599):199–228.Google Scholar
• Shiv B, Fedorikhin A (1999) Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. J. Consumer Res. 26(3):278–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stangl T, Thonemann UW (2017) Equivalent inventory metrics: A behavioral perspective. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):472–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Tokar T, Aloysius JA, Waller MA (2012) Supply chain inventory replenishment: The debiasing effect of declarative knowledge. Decision Sci. 43(3):525–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A (1972) Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psych. Rev. 79(4):281–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uppari BS, Hasija S (2019) Modeling newsvendor behavior: A prospect theory approach. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):481–500.Link, Google Scholar
• Young W (1984) A non-tradeoff decision making model of residential location choice. Transportation Res. Part A 18(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar