Multipolar Security Cooperation Planning: A Multiobjective, Adversarial-Risk-Analysis Approach

References

• Abdellaoui M, Driouchi A, l’Haridon O (2011) Risk aversion elicitation: Reconciling tractability and bias minimization. Theory Decision 71(1):63–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banks D, Petralia F, Wang S (2011) Adversarial risk analysis: Borel games. Appl. Stochastic Models Bus. Indust. 27(2):72–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banks D, Ríos J, Ríos Insua D (2015) Adversarial Risk Analysis (Taylor and Francis, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barzily Z, Marlow W, Zacks S (1979) Survey of approaches to readiness. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 26(1):21–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger JO (2013) Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Biden JR (2021) Interim national security guidance. Technical report, Executive Office of the President, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL (2000) A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Sci. 46(11):1485–1496.Link, Google Scholar
• Bothwell R (1997) Review of We Now Know: Rethinking Cold-War History by John Lewis Gaddis. Internat J. 52(3):537.Google Scholar
• Caballero WN, Lunday BJ (2019) Influence modeling: Mathematical programming representations of persuasion under either risk or uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 278(1):266–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caballero WN, Lunday BJ, Uber RP (2021a) Identifying behaviorally robust strategies for normal form games under varying forms of uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 288(3):971–982.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caballero WN, Naveiro R, Ríos Insua D (2021b) Modeling ethical and operational preferences in automated driving systems. Decision Anal. 19(1):21–43.Link, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF (2004) Behavioral game theory: Predicting human behavior in strategic situations. Camerer CF, Loewenstein G, Rabin M, eds. Advances in Behavioral Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 374–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Ho TH, Chong JK (2004) A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quart. J. Econom. 119(3):861–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cano J, Ríos Insua D, Tedeschi A, Turhan U (2016) Security economics: An adversarial risk analysis approach to airport protection. Ann. Oper. Res. 245(1):359–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu CK, Marron JS (1991) Choosing a kernel regression estimator. Statist. Sci. 6(4):404–419.Google Scholar
• Cooley A, Nexon DH (2020) How hegemony ends. Foreign Aff. 99:143.Google Scholar
• Costa-Gomes M, Crawford VP, Broseta B (2001) Cognition and behavior in normal-form games: An experimental study. Econometrica 69(5):1193–1235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Couce-Vieira A, Insua DR, Kosgodagan A (2020) Assessing and forecasting cybersecurity impacts. Decision Anal. 17(4):356–374.Link, Google Scholar
• Donnel S, Caballero WN, Lunday BJ (2021) The effects of communication modality and situational complexity on strategic decision-making. Master’s thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright Patterson AFB.Google Scholar
• Doyle MP, Deckro RF, Kloeber JM Jr, Jackson JA (2000) Measures of merit for offensive information operations courses of action. Military Oper. Res. 5(2):5–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Everstine BW (2021) Mobility aircraft, airmen practice for new ways of war. Air Force Magazine (May 24), https://www.airforcemag.com/exercise-mobility-guardian-2021/.Google Scholar
• Ford TC, Colombi JM, Jacques DR, Graham SR (2009) A general method of measuring interoperability and describing its impact on operational effectiveness. J. Defense Model. Simulation 6(1):17–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fund for Peace (2022) Fragile states index. Accessed June 13, 2022, https://fragilestatesindex.org/.Google Scholar
• Garthwaite PH, Kadane JB, O’Hagan A (2005) Statistical methods for eliciting probability distributions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 100(470):680–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gil C, Rios Insua D, Rios J (2016) Adversarial risk analysis for urban security resource allocation. Risk Anal. 36(4):727–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goethals PL, Scala NM (2018) Eliminating the weakest link approach to army unit readiness. Decision Anal. 15(2):110–130.Link, Google Scholar
• González-Ortega J, Soyer R, Insua DR, Ruggeri F (2021) An adversarial risk analysis framework for batch acceptance problems. Decision Anal. 18(1):25–40.Link, Google Scholar
• Hanauer L, Pezard S (2014) Security cooperation amidst political uncertainty. Technical report, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Hanley JT Jr (2017) Changing DoD’s analysis paradigm. Naval War College Rev. 70(1):64–103.Google Scholar
• Hausken K (2018) Proactivity and retroactivity of firms and information sharing of hackers. Internat. Game Theory Rev. 20(01):1750027.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jong-A-Pin R (2009) On the measurement of political instability and its impact on economic growth. Eur. J. Political Econom. 25(1):15–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kadane JB, Larkey PD (1982) Subjective probability and the theory of games. Management Sci. 28(2):113–120.Link, Google Scholar
• Kasunic M (2001) Measuring systems interoperability: Challenges and opportunities. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2004-TN-003, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Keeney RL (1988) Structuring objectives for problems of public interest. Oper. Res. 36(3):396–405.Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL (2007) Modeling values for anti-terrorism analysis. Risk Anal. 27(3):585–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL (2009) Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, von Winterfeldt D (2011) A value model for evaluating homeland security decisions. Risk Anal. 31(9):1470–1487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Raiffa H, Meyer RF (1993) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Renn O, von Winterfeldt D (1987) Structuring West Germany’s energy objectives. Energy Policy 15(4):352–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Von Winterfeldt D, Eppel T (1990) Eliciting public values for complex policy decisions. Management Sci. 36(9):1011–1030.Link, Google Scholar
• Kerchner PM, Deckro RF, Kloeber JM Jr (2001) Valuing psychological operations. Military Oper. Res. 6(2):45–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krauthammer C (2002) The unipolar moment revisited. Natl. Interest 70:5–18.Google Scholar
• Krueger JI (2008) From social projection to social behaviour. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 18(1):1–35.Google Scholar
• Krueger JI, Acevedo M (2005) Social projection and the psychology of choice. Alicke MD, Dunning DA, Krueger J, eds. The Self in Social Perception (Taylor and Francis, New York), 17–41.Google Scholar
• Leal Gd SS, Guédria W, Panetto H (2019) Interoperability assessment: A systematic literature review. Comput. Indust. 106:111–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitin G, Hausken K (2009) Intelligence and impact contests in systems with redundancy, false targets, and partial protection. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 94(12):1927–1941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu B (2012) Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies (Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael, CA). https://www.morganclaypool.com/doi/abs/10.2200/s00416ed1v01y201204hlt016?casa_token=Io64w8g7gEIAAAAA:PA7sQ_EgY87PSlcyxNebjZZZhHMcIJsEmU75dm13QWljID5Ki6J7LqMmSbAK1vjDoREfrHCm_Waj.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis JP, McNerney MJ, Zimmerman SR, Archer M, Boback J, Stebbins D (2016) Developing an assessment, monitoring, and evaluation framework for U.S. Department of Defense security cooperation. Technical report, National Defense Research Institute, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Martin B, Linick ME, Fraade-Blanar L, Burns JG, Foran C, Grocholski KR, Hastings KC, Litterer S, Lynch KF, Mondschein J (2021) Measuring strategic readiness: Identifying metrics for core dimensions. Technical report, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Mattis J (2018) Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America. Technical report, U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• McCarty N, Meirowitz A (2007) Political Game Theory: An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLay L, Rothschild C, Guikema S (2012) Robust adversarial risk analysis: A level-k approach. Decision Anal. 9(1):41–54.Link, Google Scholar
• McNerney MJ, O’Mahony A, Szayna TS, Eaton D, Baxter C, Clarke CP, Cutrufello E, McGee M, Peterson H, Payne LA (2014) Assessing security cooperation as a preventive tool. Technical report, RAND Arroyo Center, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Meisel C, Moyer JD, Gutberlet S (2020) How do you actually measure military capability? Accessed December 1, 2021, https://mwi.usma.edu/how-do-you-actually-measure-military-capability/.Google Scholar
• Moore SC, Stockfisch J, Goldberg MS, Holroyd SM, Hildebrandt GG (1991) Measuring military readiness and sustainability. Technical report, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Moroney JD, Hogler J, Kennedy-Boudali L, Pezard S (2011) Integrating the full range of security cooperation programs into Air Force planning: An analytic primer. Technical report, Project Air Force, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Mousavi S, Gigerenzer G (2017) Heuristics are tools for uncertainty. Homo Oeconomicus 34(4):361–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• North Atlantic Treaty Organization (2019) Allied Joint Publication-5: Allied joint doctrine for the planning of operations. Accessed December 1, 2021, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/837082/dcdc_doctrine_nato_planning_of_ops_ajp_5.pdf.Google Scholar
• O’Hagan A, Buck CE, Daneshkhah A, Eiser JR, Garthwaite PH, Jenkinson DJ, Oakley JE, Rakow T (2006) Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts’ Probabilities (John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Parnell GS, Terry Bresnick M, Tani SN, Johnson ER (2013) Handbook of Decision Analysis, Vol. 6 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pernin CG, Hlavka JP, Boyer ME, Gordon IVJ, Lerario M, Osburg J, Shurkin M, Gibson DC (2019) Targeted interoperability: A new imperative for multinational operations. Technical report, RAND Arroyo Center, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Raffensperger JF, Schrage LE (1997) A new paradigm for measuring military readiness. Military Oper. Res. 3(5):21–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raiffa H (1982) The Art and Science of Negotiation (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Regnier ED (2020) What is six hours worth? The impact of lead time on tropical-storm preparation decisions. Decision Anal. 17(1):9–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Rios Insua D, Banks D, Rios J (2016) Modeling opponents in adversarial risk analysis. Risk Anal. 36(4):742–755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rios Insua D, Ríos J, Banks D (2009) Adversarial risk analysis. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 104(486):841–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rios Insua D, Alfaro C, Gomez J, Hernandez-Coronado P, Bernal F (2019) Forecasting and assessing consequences of aviation safety occurrences. Safety Sci. 111:243–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rios Insua D, Couce-Vieira A, Rubio JA, Pieters W, Labunets K, Rasines DG (2021) An adversarial risk analysis framework for cybersecurity. Risk Anal. 41(1):16–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roponen J, Insua DR, Salo A (2020) Adversarial risk analysis under partial information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 287(1):306–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sevillano JC, Rios Insua D, Rios J (2012) Adversarial risk analysis: The Somali pirates case. Decision Anal. 9(2):86–95.Link, Google Scholar
• Shallcross NJ, Ahner DK (2020) Predictive models of world conflict: Accounting for regional and conflict-state differences. J. Defense Model. Simulation 17(3):243–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silver D, Hubert T, Schrittwieser J, Antonoglou I, Lai M, Guez A, Lanctot M, et al. (2018) A general reinforcement learning algorithm that masters chess, shogi, and go through self-play. Science 362(6419):1140–1144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon J, Regnier E, Whitney L (2014) A value-focused approach to energy transformation in the United States Department of Defense. Decision Anal. 11(2):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Stahl DO, Wilson PW (1995) On players’ models of other players: Theory and experimental evidences. Games Econom. Behav. 10(1):218–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trunkey RD (2013) Implications of the Department of Defense readiness reporting system. Technical report, Congressional Budget Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Air Force (2015) Air Force future operating concept: A view of the Air Force in 2035. https://www.ang.af.mil/Portals/77/documents/AFD-151207-019.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Air Force (2016) Air Force Doctrine Publication 3-0: Operations and planning. https://www.doctrine.af.mil/Portals/61/documents/AFDP_3-0/3-0-AFDP-OPERATIONS-PLANNING.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Air Force (2019) Air Force doctrine core doctrine, Annex 3-10: Force protection. Accessed December 1, 2021, https://www.doctrine.af.mil/Portals/61/documents/AFDP_3-10/3-10-AFDP-Force-Protection.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Air Force (2020a) A primer on doctrine. Accessed December 1, 2021, https://www.doctrine.af.mil/Portals/61/documents/Doctrine_Primer/A%20Primer%20on%20Doctrine%208%20Oct%2020%20v2.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Air Force (2020b) AFI 10-201: Force readiness reporting. https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/af_a3/publication/afi10-201/afi10-201.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Air Force (2022) Red Flag-Nellis 22-1 kicks off with allied forces. https://www.nellis.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/2909175/red-flag-nellis-22-1-kicks-off-with-allied-forces/.Google Scholar
• U.S. Army (2010) Army Regulation 220-1: Army unit status reporting and force registration—Consolidated policies. https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/r220_1.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Army (2015) Army security cooperation handbook. https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/p11_31.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of State (2021) Integrated country strategies. https://www.state.gov/integrated-country-strategies/.Google Scholar
• U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff (2014a) CJCSI 3401.02B: Force readiness reporting. https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/training/cjcsi3401_02b.pdf?ver=2017-12-29-171240-350.Google Scholar
• U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff (2014b) Joint Publication 3-13: Information operations. https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp3_13.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff (2017a) Joint Publication 3-20: Security cooperation. https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp3_20_20172305.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff (2017b) Joint Publication 5-0: Joint planning. https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp5_0_20171606.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff (2019) Joint Doctrine Note 1-19: Competition continuum. https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/jdn_jg/jdn1_19.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff (2021) Joint Publication 3-22: Foreign internal defense. https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp3_22.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Office of the White House (2013) Presidential Policy Directive 23: U.S. security assistance policy. https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=747214.Google Scholar
• von Clausewitz C (1984) On War, Vol. 1 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ). https://antilogicalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/on-war.pdf.Google Scholar
• Wang S, Banks D (2011) Network routing for insurgency: An adversarial risk analysis framework. Naval Res. Logist. 58(6):595–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• World Bank (2021) Worldwide governance indicators. Accessed December 1, 2021, https://databank.worldbank.org/source/worldwide-bureaucracy-indicators-(wwbi).Google Scholar
• Zank H (2001) Cumulative prospect theory for parametric and multiattribute utilities. Math. Oper. Res. 26(1):67–81.Link, Google Scholar