A Behavioral Model of Responsible Sourcing in Supply Chains: The Role of Dual-Sourcing Bias

References

• Anton JJ, Brusco S, Lopomo G (2010) Split-award procurement auctions with uncertain scale economies: Theory and data. Games Econom. Behav. 69(1):24–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anupindi R, Akella R (1993) Diversification under supply uncertainty. Management Sci. 39(8):944–963.Link, Google Scholar
• Awasthy P, Hazra J (2019) Responsible sourcing by improving workplace safety through buyer–supplier collaboration. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 274(1):155–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baskentli S, Sen S, Du S, Bhattacharya C (2019) Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility: The role of CSR domains. J. Bus. Res. 95:502–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belhadi A, Kamble SS, Mani V, Venkatesh V, Shi Y (2021) Behavioral mechanisms influencing sustainable supply chain governance decision-making from a dyadic buyer-supplier perspective. Internat. J. Production Econom. 236:108136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Thaler RH (2001) Naïve diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(1):79–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bian J, Liao Y, Wang YY, Tao F (2021) Analysis of firm CSR strategies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 290(3):914–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birch S (2012) How activism forced Nike to change its ethical game. The Guardian (July), https://www.theguardian.com/environment/green-living-blog/2012/jul/06/activism-nike.Google Scholar
• Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol. Methods Res. 33(2):261–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi A, Beil DR, Martínez-de-Albéniz V (2014) Split-award auctions for supplier retention. Management Sci. 60(7):1719–1737.Link, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta S, Spulber DF (1989) Managing procurement auctions. Inform. Econom. Policy 4(1):5–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Pelsmacker P, Driesen L, Rayp G (2005) Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. J. Consumer Affairs 39(2):363–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckerd S, Handley S, Lumineau F (2022) Trust violations in buyer–supplier relationships: Spillovers and the contingent role of governance structures. J. Supply Chain Management 58(3):47–70.Google Scholar
• Fairtrade (2021) Coffee impact report: 2020. Accessed December 10, 2022, https://www.fairtradeamerica.org/why-fairtrade/global-impact/reportstrends/coffee-impact-report-2020/.Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Clemen RT (2005) Subjective probability assessment in decision analysis: Partition dependence and bias toward the ignorance prior. Management Sci. 51(9):1417–1432.Link, Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Ratner RK, Lieb DS (2005) How subjective grouping of options influences choice and allocation: Diversification bias and the phenomenon of partition dependence. J. Experiment. Psych. General 134(4):538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt K, Kremer M, Thomas DJ, Craighead CW (2021) Strategic sourcing under severe disruption risk: Learning failures and under-diversification bias. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(4):761–780.Link, Google Scholar
• Guo R, Lee HL, Swinney R (2016) Responsible sourcing in supply chains. Management Sci. 62(9):2722–2744.Link, Google Scholar
• Gurnani H, Ramachandran K, Ray S, Xia Y (2014) Ordering behavior under supply risk: An experimental investigation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 16(1):61–75.Link, Google Scholar
• Hainmueller J, Hiscox M, Sequeira S (2015) Consumer demand for the Fair Trade label: Evidence from a multi-store field experiment. Rev. Econom. Statist. 97(2):242–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendriks A (2012) Sophie: Software Platform for Human Interaction Experiments (University of Osnabruck, Osnabruck, Germany).Google Scholar
• Ho TH, Lim N, Cui TH (2010) Reference dependence in multilocation newsvendor models: A structural analysis. Management Sci. 56(11):1891–1910.Link, Google Scholar
• Jain T, Hazra J (2017) Dual sourcing under suppliers’ capacity investments. Internat. J. Production Econom. 183:103–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John A, Klein J (2003) The boycott puzzle: Consumer motivations for purchase sacrifice. Management Sci. 49(9):1196–1209.Link, Google Scholar
• Klein JG, Smith NC, John A (2004) Why we boycott: Consumer motivations for boycott participation. J. Marketing 68(3):92–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klotz DE, Chatterjee K (1995) Dual sourcing in repeated procurement competitions. Management Sci. 41(8):1317–1327.Link, Google Scholar
• Kraft T, Zheng Y, Erhun F (2013) The NGO’s dilemma: How to influence firms to replace a potentially hazardous substance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):649–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Pulles NJ, Loohuis RP (2020) Managing buyer-supplier conflicts: The effect of buyer openness and directness on a supplier’s willingness to adapt. J. Supply Chain Management 56(4):65–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramchandani P, Bastani H, Moon K (2020) Responsible sourcing: The first step is the hardest. Preprint, submitted August 29, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3656497.Google Scholar
• Ratner RK, Kahn BE, Kahneman D (1999) Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. J. Consumer Res. 26(1):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, Loewenstein G (1995) Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separated choices. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 1(1):34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, Antonides G, van den Ouden L, Trienekens H (2001) Which is better: Simultaneous or sequential choice? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 84(1):54–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, Loewenstein G, Rabin M, Keren G, Laibson D (2000) Choice bracketing. Fischhoff B, Manski CF, eds. Elicitation of Preferences (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 171–202.Google Scholar
• Ried L, Eckerd S, Kaufmann L, Carter C (2021) Spillover effects of information leakages in buyer–supplier–supplier triads. J. Oper. Management 67(3):280–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riordan MH, Sappington DE (1989) Second sourcing. RAND J. Econom. 20(1):41–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen S, Bhattacharya CB (2001) Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J. Marketing Res. 38(2):225–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen S, Gürhan-Canli Z, Morwitz V (2001) Withholding consumption: A social dilemma perspective on consumer boycotts. J. Consumer Res. 28(3):399–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Servaes H, Tamayo A (2013) The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management. Sci. 59(5):1045–1061.Link, Google Scholar
• Shao L, Ryan JK, Sun D (2020) Responsible sourcing under asymmetric information: Price signaling vs. supplier disclosure. Decision Sci. 51(5):1082–1109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson I (1990) The effect of purchase quantity and timing on variety-seeking behavior. J. Marketing Res. 27(2):150–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH (1999) Mental accounting matters. J. Behav. Decision Making 12(3):183–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thorlakson T, de Zegher JF, Lambin EF (2018) Companies’ contribution to sustainability through global supply chains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(9):2072–2077.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trudel R, Cotte J (2009) Does it pay to be good? MIT Sloan Management Rev. 50(2):61.Google Scholar
• van Donselaar KH, Gaur V, van Woensel T, Broekmeulen RACM, Fransoo JC (2010) Ordering behavior in retail stores and implications for automated replenishment. Management Sci. 56(5):766–784.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Gilland W, Tomlin B (2010) Mitigating supply risk: Dual sourcing or process improvement? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(3):489–510.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang X, Tauni MZ, Zhang Q, Ali A, Ali F (2020) Does buyer-seller personality match enhance impulsive buying? A green marketing context. J. Marketing Theory Practice 28(4):436–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wathne KH, Heide JB (2004) Relationship governance in a supply chain network. J. Marketing 68(1):73–89.Crossref, Google Scholar