Eliciting Informative Priors by Modeling Expert Decision Making

References

• Angwin J, Larson J, Mattu S, Kirchner L (2016) Machine Bias. Ethics of Data and Analytics (Auerbach Publications, Florida), 254–264.Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association (2017) Ethnic and racial minorities & socioeconomic status. Accessed October 28, 2011, http://www.apa.org/pi/ses/resources/publications/factsheet-erm.aspx.Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011) Australian and New Zealand Standard Offence Classification (ANZSOC). Accessed February 21, 2023, https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/australian-and-new-zealand-standard-offence-classification-anzsoc/2011.Google Scholar
• Belenguer L (2022) Ai bias: Exploring discriminatory algorithmic decision-making models and the application of possible machine-centric solutions adapted from the pharmaceutical industry. AI and Ethics 2(4):771–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casement CJ, Kahle DJ (2018) Graphical prior elicitation in univariate models. Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. 47(10):2906–2924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caulkins J, Cohen J, Gorr W, Wei J (1996) Predicting criminal recidivism: A comparison of neural network models with statistical methods. J. Crim. Justice. 24(3):227–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dastin J (2018) Amazon Scraps Secret AI Recruiting Tool that Showed Bias Against Women. Ethics of Data and Analytics (Auerbach Publications, Florida), 296–299.Google Scholar
• de la Cruz R, Padilla O, Valle MA, Ruz GA (2021) Modeling recidivism through Bayesian regression models and deep neural networks. Mathematics 9(6):639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckenrode RT (1965) Weighting multiple criteria. Management Sci. 12(3):180–192.Link, Google Scholar
• Edwards W, Barron FH (1994) Smarts and smarter: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes. 60(3):306–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falconer JR, Frank E, Polaschek DL, Joshi C (2022) Methods for eliciting informative prior distributions: A critical review. Decis. Anal. 19(3):189–204.Link, Google Scholar
• Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to roc analysis. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 27(8):861–874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher JD, McEvoy KR (2022) Bayesian multinomial logistic regression for numerous categories. Preprint, submitted August 30, https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.14537.Google Scholar
• Galway LA (2007) Subjective Probability Distribution Elicitation in Cost Risk Analysis: A Review (Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA).Google Scholar
• Janis IL (2008) Groupthink. IEEE Engrg. Management Rev. 36(1):36.Google Scholar
• Jargowsky PA (2005) Omitted variable bias. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement 2:919–924.Google Scholar
• Jenkinson D (2005) The elicitation of probabilities: A review of the statistical literature.Google Scholar
• Kadane J, Wolfson LJ (1998) Experiences in elicitation. [read before the royal statistical society at a meeting on ‘elicitation’ on Wednesday, April 16th, 1997, the president, professor afm smith in the chair] Statistician. 47(1):3–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Slovic SP, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKay DJ (2003) Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Massey FJ (1951) The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 46(253):68–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’brien SM, Dunson DB (2004) Bayesian multivariate logistic regression. Biometrics 60(3):739–746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Hagan A (2019) Expert knowledge elicitation: Subjective but scientific. The Amer. Statist. 73(sup1):69–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Hagan A, Buck CE, Daneshkhah A, Eiser JR, Garthwaite PH, Jenkinson DJ, Oakley JE, Rakow T (2006) Uncertain judgements: Eliciting experts’ probabilities.Google Scholar
• Perälä T, Vanhatalo J, Chrysafi A (2020) Calibrating expert assessments using hierarchical Gaussian process models. Bayesian Anal. 15(4):1251–1280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Press SJ (2009) Subjective and Objective Bayesian Statistics: Principles, Models, and Applications, vol. 84, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Sasaki Y, et al. (2007) The truth of the f-measure. Teach tutor mater 1(5):1–5.Google Scholar
• Schmidt P, Witte AD (1989) Predicting criminal recidivism using ‘split population’ survival time models. J. Econometrics. 40(1):141–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas O, Pesonen H, Corander J (2020) Probabilistic elicitation of expert knowledge through assessment of computer simulations. Preprint, submitted February 25, https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.10902.Google Scholar
• Tollenaar N, van der Heijden PG (2013) Which method predicts recidivism best?: A comparison of statistical, machine learning and data mining predictive models. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A. 176(2):565–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang C, Bier VM (2013) Expert elicitation of adversary preferences using ordinal judgments. Oper. Res. 61(2):372–385.Link, Google Scholar
• Winkler RL (1967) The quantification of judgment: Some methodological suggestions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 62(320):1105–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zyphur MJ, Oswald FL (2015) Bayesian estimation and inference: A user’s guide. J. Management 41(2):390–420.Crossref, Google Scholar