Comment on “Whose Judgement? Reflections on Elicitation in Bayesian Analysis”

References

• Armstrong D (2005) Organization in the Mind: Psychoanalysis, Group Relations, and Organizational Consultancy (Karnac Books, London).Google Scholar
• Edwards W (1962) Utility, subjective probability, their interaction, and variance preferences. J. Conflict Resolution 6(1):42–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• French S (2024) Whose judgement? Reflections on elicitation in Bayesian analysis. Decision Anal. 21(3):143–159.Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morton A, Airoldi M, Phillips L (2009) Nuclear risk management on stage: The UK’s Committee on Radioactive Waste Management. Risk Anal. 29(5):764–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips LD (1999) Group elicitation of probability distributions: Are many heads better than one? Shanteau J, Mellors B, Schum D, eds. Decision Science and Technology: Reflections on the Contributions of Ward Edwards (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA), 313–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips LD (2011) The Royal Navy’s Type 45 story: A case study. Salo A, Keisler J, Morton A, eds. Portfolio Decision Analysis: Improved Methods for Resource Allocation (Springer Science + Business Media, New York), 53–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips LD, Wisniewski TK (1983) Bayesian models for computer-aided underwriting. Statistician 32:252–263.Crossref, Google Scholar