How to Control Waste Incineration Pollution? Cost-Sharing or Penalty Mechanism—Based on Two Differential Game Models

References

• Ademola AA (2022) Comparisons of incineration and gasification thermal conversion of municipal solid waste in Trinidad and Tobago. Pro. Com. Sci. 203:290–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amulen J, Kasedde H, Serugunda J, Lwanyaga JD (2022) The potential of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in Kampala City, Uganda by incineration. Energy Convers. Management 14:100204–100215.Google Scholar
• Avenhaus R, Canty M, Kilgour DM, Von Stengel B, Zamir S (1996) Inspection games in arms control. European J. Oper. Res. 90(3):383–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avenhaus Ra, Canty MJb (2011) Deterrence, technology, and the sensible distribution of arms control verification resources. Naval Res. Logist. 58(3):295–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Badgett A, Newes E, Milbrandt A (2019) Economic analysis of wet waste-to-energy resources in the United States. Energy 176:224–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertinelli L, Camacho C, Zou B (2014) Carbon capture and storage and transboundary pollution: A differential game approach. European J. Oper. Res. 237(2):721–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai P, Chen T, Chen B, Wang Y, Ma Z, Yan J (2023) The impact of pollutant emissions from co-incineration of industrial waste in municipal solid waste incinerators. Fuel 129027:129027–129034.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chander P, Tulkens H (1992) Theoretical foundations of negotiations and cost sharing in transfrontier pollution problems. Eur. Econom. Rev. 36(2–3):388–399.Google Scholar
• Chang S, Sethi S, Wang X (2018) Optimal abatement and emission permit trading policies in a dynamic transboundary pollution game. Dyn. Games Appl. 8(3):542–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Valdmanis V (2019) The content analysis of Chinese media report on the issue of waste incineration power plants. Management Environ. Qual. 30(2):456–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Li J, Liu Q, Luo H, Li B, Cheng J, Huang Y (2022) Emission characteristics and impact factors of air pollutants from municipal solid waste incineration in Shanghai, China. J. Environ. Management 310:114732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheung M, Zhuang J (2012) Regulation games between government and competing companies: oil spills and other disasters. Decis. Anal. 9(2):156–164.Link, Google Scholar
• Chu X, Jin Y, Chu Z (2022) Quantitative evaluation of heavy metal pollution hazards in leachate during fermentation before municipal solid waste incineration. J. Clean. Production 335:130200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Comoglio C, Castelluccio S, Scarrone A, Onofrio M, Fiore S (2022) Assessing the environmental performances of waste-to-energy plants: The case-study of the EMAS-registered waste incinerators in Italy. Waste Management 153:209–218.Google Scholar
• Development MoHaU-R (2020) Opinions on further promoting the MSW classification 2020. http://www.ggj.gov.cn/tzgg/202012/t20201209_31588.htm.Google Scholar
• Du Y, Liu P, Su S, Zhou L (2022) The sharing of costs and benefits of rural environmental pollution governance in china: A qualitative analysis through guanxi networks perspective. Internat. J. Environmental. Res. Public Health 19(11):6587.Google Scholar
• El Ouardighi F, Kogan K, Gnecco G, Sanguineti M (2020) Transboundary pollution control and environmental absorption efficiency management. Ann. Oper. Res. 287(2):653–681.Google Scholar
• Feng D, Wei D (2017) Analysis of an Evolutionary Game under Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Power Generation Based on System Dynamics. Indust. Eng. J. 20(1):1–11.Google Scholar
• Fukuyama K, Kilgour DM, Hipel KW (1994) Systematic policy development to ensure compliance to environmental regulations. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 24(9):1289–1305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grogan C, Kerner J, Tuig JV, Romsos D (2023) Game research on textile recycling supply chain considering the reward and punishment mechanism. J. Silk 60(1):97–105.Google Scholar
• Gu S, Liu Y, Yu H (2023) Power battery recycling strategy with government rewards and punishments. Opsearch 60(1):501–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo Q (2022) Environment Risk Management of G Company’s Living Garbage Incineration Power Generation Project (University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, China).Google Scholar
• Han S (2022) General competing mechanism games with strategy-proof punishment. J. Math. Econom. 102:102728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He J, Lin B (2019) Assessment of waste incineration power with considerations of subsidies and emissions in China. Energy Policy 126(1):190–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong Z, Chu C, Zhang L, Yu Y (2017) Optimizing an emission trading scheme for local governments: A Stackelberg game model and hybrid algorithm. Internat. J. Production Econom. 193:172–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu D, Liu H, Chen X, Chen Y (2019) Research on the ecological compensation standard of the basin pollution control project based on evolutionary game theory and by taking Xiangjiang River as a case. Front. Eng. Management 6(4):575–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu Z, Chen C, Wang H, Zhang W (2014) Study on the differential game and strategy of water pollution control. Front. Eng. Management 24(5):93–101.Google Scholar
• Jia F, Wang D-d, Zhou K, Li L (2022) Differential decision analysis of transboundary pollution considering the participation of the central government. Management Decis. Econom. (6):1684–1703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang K, Merrill R, You D, Pan P, Li Z (2019) Optimal control for transboundary pollution under ecological compensation: A stochastic differential game approach. J. Clean. Production 241:118391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin X, Zhou H (2022) Incentives to enhance production reliability against disruption: cost-sharing vs. penalty. Sustainability 14(15):9003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• JØrgensen S, Zaccour G (2001) Time consistent side payments in a dynamic game of downstream pollution. J. Econom. Dynam. Control. 25(12):1973–1987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kai J, Liu M, Wang Y, Zhang D (2023) Punish or reward? How to strengthen supervision of nucleic acid testing. Kybernetes., ePub ahead of print July 12, https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2022-1722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kambhu J (1990) Direct controls and incentives systems of regulation. J. Environ. Econom. Management 18(2):S72–S85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li S (2014) A differential game of transboundary industrial pollution with emission permits trading. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 163(2):642–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li HJ, Tan DQ (2023) Differential game analysis between government and waste incineration plants on the management of municipal solid waste classification. Kybernetes, ePub ahead of print March 23, https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2022-1687.Google Scholar
• Li Y, Homburg V, de Jong M, Koppenjan J (2016) Government responses to environmental conflicts in urban China: the case of the Panyu waste incineration power plant in Guangzhou. J. Clean Production 134(Part A):354–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhao X, Li Y, Li X (2015) Waste incineration industry and development policies in China. Waste Management 46(12):234–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang J, Liu Z, Chen L, Wang Y (2021) Harmless treatment of municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash through shaft furnace. Waste Management 124:110–117.Google Scholar
• Li X, Ma Y, Zhang M, Zhan M, Wang P, Lin X, Chen T, Lu S, Yan J (2019) Study on the relationship between waste classification, combustion condition and dioxin emission from waste incineration. Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy 1(2):91–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang, Buenemann M, Langbein L (2021) Comparing the effects of changes in performance incentives and implementation activities on policy outcomes: evidence from air pollution emissions in China. J. Com. Policy. Anal: Rese. Prac. 23(3):328–349.Google Scholar
• Lin S (2004) Designing Incentive Systems for Risk-Informed Regulation (University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI).Google Scholar
• Liu JY, Xiao L, Wang J, Wang CJ (2022) Payments for environmental services strategy for transboundary air pollution: A stochastic differential game perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 852:158286.Google Scholar
• Martn-Herrn G, Rubio S (2018) Optimal environmental policy for a polluting monopoly with abatement costs: Taxes vs. standards. Environ. Model. Assess. 23(6):671–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meng Q, Liu Y, Li Z, Wu C (2021) Dynamic reward and penalty strategies of green building construction incentive: An evolutionary game theory-based analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 28(33):44902–44915.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michaelsen MM, Esch T (2021) Motivation and reward mechanisms in health behavior change processes. Brain Res. 1757:147309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mukherjee C, Denney J, Mbonimpa EG, Slagley J, Bhowmik R (2020) A review on municipal solid waste-to-energy trends in the USA. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 119:109512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• NDRC (2021) 14th Five-Year Plan for the development of MSW classification and treatment facilities. Accessed October 25, 2023, https://www-ndrc-gov-cn-s.era.lib.swjtu.edu.cn/xxgk/zcfb/tz/202105/t20210513_1279763.html.Google Scholar
• O’Hare M (1977) ‘Not on my block you don’t’: facility siting and the strategic importance of compensation. Public Policy 25(4):407–458.Google Scholar
• Ouardighi FE, Sim JE, Kim B (2021) Pollution accumulation and abatement policies in two supply chains under vertical and horizontal competition and strategy types. Omega 98:102108.Google Scholar
• Ozturk M, Dincer I (2020) An efficient waste management system with municipal solid waste incineration plant. Greenhouse Gases: Sci. Technol. 10(4):855–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Panepinto D, Zanetti MC (2018) Municipal solid waste incineration plant: A multi-step approach to the evaluation of an energy-recovery configuration. Waste Management 73:332–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pour N, Webley PA, Cook PJ (2018) Potential for using municipal solid waste as a resource for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 68:1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandhu K (2014) Historical trajectory of waste management - an analysis using the health belief model. Management Environ. Qual. 25(5):615–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shan X, Zhuang J (2014) Modeling credible retaliation threats in deterring the smuggling of nuclear weapons using partial inspection-a three-stage game. Decision Anal. 11(1):43–62.Link, Google Scholar
• Sheng J, Zhou W, Zhu B (2020) The coordination of stakeholder interests in environmental regulation: Lessons from China’s environmental regulation policies from the perspective of the evolutionary game theory. J. Clean. Production 249:119385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soltani A, Sadiq R, Hewage K (2016) Selecting sustainable waste-to-energy technologies for municipal solid waste treatment: a game theory approach for group decision-making. J. Clean. Production 113:388–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song M, Wang S, Wu K (2018) Environment-biased technological progress and industrial land-use efficiency in China’s new normal. Ann. Oper. Res. 268(1–2):425–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song Z, Zhang X, Tan Y, Zeng Q, Hua Y, Wu X, Li M, Liu X, Luo M (2023) An all-in-one strategy for municipal solid waste incineration fly ash full resource utilization by heat treatment with added kaolin. J. Environ. Management 329:117074.Google Scholar
• Sun JY, Tan DQ (2021) Non-cooperative mode, cost-sharing mode, or cooperative mode: which is the optimal mode for desertification control? Comput. Econom. 61(3):975–1008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun DQ, Ge Y, Zhou Y (2019) Punishing and rewarding: How do policy measures affect crop straw use by farmers? An empirical analysis of Jiangsu Province of China. Energy Policy 134:110882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang L, Guo J, Wan R, Jia M, Qu J, Li L, Bo X (2023) Air pollutant emissions and reduction potentials from municipal solid waste incineration in China. Environmental Pollution 319:121021.Google Scholar
• Teng M, Zhao M, Han C, Liu P (2022) Research on mechanisms to incentivize corporate environmental responsibility based on a differential game approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 29(38):57997–58010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tian H, Gao J, Lu L, Zhao D, Cheng K, Qiu P (2012) Temporal trends and spatial variation characteristics of hazardous air pollutant emission inventory from municipal solid waste incineration in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46(18):10364–10371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vyas S, Prajapati P, Shah AV, Varjani S (2022) Municipal solid waste management: Dynamics, risk assessment, ecological influence, advancements, constraints and perspectives. Sci. Total Environ. 814:152802.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Chang D, Wang X (2023) Does the regional atmospheric quality punishment incentive mechanism (AQPI) promote environmental regulation? Subordinate government as an agent of superior environmental policies. J. Clean. Production 414:137718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wei C, Luo C (2020) A differential game design of watershed pollution management under ecological compensation criterion. J. Clean. Production 274:122320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wei J, Wang C (2021) Improving interaction mechanism of carbon reduction technology innovation between supply chain enterprises and government by means of differential game. J. Clean. Production 296:126578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu L, Wang Y, Zhang C (2022a) Design of Contract Considering Manufacturers’ Moral Hazard for Carbon Emission Reduction under Government Punishment Mechanism. IAENG Int. J. Appl. Math. 52(4):1088–1097.Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Xu X, Tian Y (2022b) Research on enterprises emission reduction technology innovation strategies with government subsidy and carbon trading mechanism. Management Decis. Econom. 43(6):2083–2097.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu H, Tan D (2023) Optimal abatement technology licensing in a dynamic transboundary pollution game: fixed fee vs. royalty. Comput. Econom. 61(3):905–935.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu J, Zhu M, Zhao S (2020) Leader-follower optimized approach for carbon-economy equilibrium in the municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration industry. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 27(26):32637–32658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang R, Tang W, Zhang J (2021) Technology improvement strategy for green products under competition: The role of government subsidy. European J. Oper. Res. 289(2):553–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang H-H, Cheruiyot NK, Lin C, Wang LC (2022) Control of extreme brominated persistent organic pollutant emissions from start-ups of waste-to-energy incinerators. J. Clean. Production 345:131108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yeung D (1992) A differential game of industrial pollution management. Ann. Oper. Res. 37(1):297–311.Google Scholar
• Yeung DWK (2007) Dynamically Consistent Cooperative Solution in a Differential Game of Transboundary Industrial Pollution. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 134(1):143–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin CX, Gu YF, Zhao GL (2023) Effects of shared governance and cost redistribution on air pollution control: a study of game theory–based cooperation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. (17):49180–49196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoshida H, Takahashi K, Takeda N, Sakai S (2009) Japan’s waste management policies for dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Management 11(3):229–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Zhao R, Huang Y, Yang L (2020) An evolutionary game theoretical analysis to conflicts among stakeholders involved in the operation of municipal waste incineration. Complexity. 2020(1):1–16.Google Scholar
• Zaman H, Zaccour G (2021) Optimal government scrappage subsidies in the presence of strategic consumers. European J. Oper. Res. 288(3):829–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeeuw Ad (2002) Differential games in economics and management science by E. J. Dockner; S. Jørgensen; N. Van Long; G. Sorger. J. Econom. 75(1):99–103.Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Liu Y, Zhai K (2021) Identifying the predictors of community acceptance of waste incineration plants in urban China: a qualitative analysis from a public perspective. Internat. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18(19):10189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Kou P, Zhang D, Yu Q (2018) Research on collusion between the government and the enterprise in pollution abatement. Oper. Res. Management Sci. 27(11):184–192.Google Scholar
• Zhou K, Wang Q, Tang J (2021) Tripartite evolutionary game and simulation analysis of coal mining safe production supervision under the Chinese Central Government’s reward and punishment mechanism. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021:1–17.Google Scholar