Endogenous Preference for Nonmarket Goods in Carbon Abatement Decisions

References

• Abbas AE (2009) Multiattribute utility copulas. Oper. Res. 57(6):1367–1383.Link, Google Scholar
• Abbas AE, Sun Z (2019) Archimedean utility copulas with polynomial generating functions. Decision Anal. 16(3):218–237.Link, Google Scholar
• Baker E, Solak S (2014) Management of energy technology for sustainability: How to fund energy technology research and development. Production Oper. Management 23(3):348–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett M (2023) Climate change and uncertainty: An asset pricing perspective. Management Sci. 69(12):7562–7584.Link, Google Scholar
• Barrage L, Nordhaus W (2024) Policies, projections, and the social cost of carbon: Results from the DICE-2023 model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121(13):e2312030121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bastien-Olvera BA, Moore FC (2021) Use and non-use value of nature and the social cost of carbon. Nature Sustainability 4(2):101–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bastien-Olvera BA, Moore FC (2022) Climate impacts on natural capital: Consequences for the social cost of carbon. Annual Rev. Resource Econom. 14(1):515–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bastien-Olvera B, Conte M, Dong X, Briceno T, Batker D, Emmerling J, Tavoni M, Granella F, Moore F (2024) Unequal climate impacts on global values of natural capital. Nature 625(7996):722–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bateman IJ, Kling CL (2020) Revealed preference methods for nonmarket valuation: An introduction to best practices. Rev. Environ. Econom. Policy 14(2):240–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckage B, Moore FC, Lacasse K (2022) Incorporating human behaviour into earth system modelling. Nature Human Behav. 6(11):1493–1502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belval EJ, Thompson MP (2023) A decision framework for evaluating the rocky mountain area wildfire dispatching system in Colorado. Decision Anal. 20(4):276–294.Link, Google Scholar
• Berger L, Emmerling J, Tavoni M (2017) Managing catastrophic climate risks under model uncertainty aversion. Management Sci. 63(3):749–765.Link, Google Scholar
• Besley T, Persson T (2023) The political economics of green transitions. Quart. J. Econom. 138(3):1863–1906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles S (1998) Endogenous preferences: The cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions. J. Econom. Literature 36(1):75–111.Google Scholar
• Bowles S, Polania-Reyes S (2012) Economic incentives and social preferences: Substitutes or complements? J. Econom. Literature 50(2):368–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks WR, Newbold SC (2014) An updated biodiversity nonuse value function for use in climate change integrated assessment models. Ecological Econom. 105(1):342–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brothers AJ, Mattigod SV, Strachan DM, Beeman GH, Kearns PK, Papa A, Monti C (2009) Resource-limited multiattribute value analysis of alternatives for immobilizing radioactive liquid process waste stored in Saluggia, Italy. Decision Anal. 6(2):98–114.Link, Google Scholar
• Christie M, Hanley N, Warren J, Murphy K, Wright R, Hyde T (2006) Valuing the diversity of biodiversity. Ecological Econom. 58(2):304–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Contasti AL, Firth AG, Baker BH, Brooks JP, Locke MA, Morin DJ (2023) Balancing tradeoffs in climate-smart agriculture: Will selling carbon credits offset potential losses in the net yield income of small-scale soybean (Glycine max L.) producers in the mid-southern United States? Decision Anal. 20(4):252–275.Link, Google Scholar
• Dietz S, Rising J, Stoerk T, Wagner G (2021) Economic impacts of tipping points in the climate system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118(34):e2103081118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drupp MA, Hänsel MC (2021) Relative prices and climate policy: How the scarcity of nonmarket goods drives policy evaluation. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 13(1):168–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JS, Sarin RK (1979) Measurable multiattribute value functions. Oper. Res. 27(4):810–822.Link, Google Scholar
• Fishburn PC, Rubinstein A (1982) Time preference. Internat. Econom. Rev. 23(3):677–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gillingham K, Stock JH (2018) The cost of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. J. Econom. Perspect. 32(4):53–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hänsel MC, Drupp MA, Johansson DJ, Nesje F, Azar C, Freeman MC, Groom B, Sterner T (2020) Climate economics support for the UN climate targets. Nature Climate Change 10(8):781–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hasselmann K (1999) Intertemporal accounting of climate change—Harmonizing economic efficiency and climate stewardship. Climate Change 41(3–4):333–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heinzow T, Tol RS (2003) Estimates of the external and sustainability costs of climate change. Working Paper No. FNU-32, Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
• Hoel M, Sterner T (2007) Discounting and relative prices. Climate Change 84(3–4):265–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Höfer T, von Nitzsch R, Madlener R (2020) Using value-focused thinking and multicriteria decision making to evaluate energy transition alternatives. Decision Anal. 17(4):330–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Howard PH, Sterner T (2017) Few and not so far between: A meta-analysis of climate damage estimates. Environ. Resource Econom. 68(1):197–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu Z, Cao J, Hong LJ (2012) Robust simulation of global warming policies using the DICE model. Management Sci. 58(12):2190–2206.Link, Google Scholar
• Hupman AC, Simon J (2023) The legacy of Peter Fishburn: Foundational work and lasting impact. Decision Anal. 20(1):1–15.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnston RJ, Boyle KJ, Adamowicz W, Bennett J, Brouwer R, Cameron TA, Hanemann WM, et al. (2017) Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. J. Assoc. Environ. Resource Econom. 4(2):319–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL (1982) Decision analysis: An overview. Oper. Res. 30(5):803–838.Link, Google Scholar
• Konc T, Savin I, van den Bergh JC (2021) The social multiplier of environmental policy: Application to carbon taxation. J. Environ. Econom. Management 105(1):102396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krzysztofowicz R (1983) Strength of preference and risk attitude in utility measurement. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 31(1):88–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar P (2012) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Lorca A, Sun XA, Litvinov E, Zheng T (2016) Multistage adaptive robust optimization for the unit commitment problem. Oper. Res. 64(1):32–51.Link, Google Scholar
• Matheson JE, Abbas AE (2005) Utility transversality: A value-based approach. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. 13(5–6):229–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mattauch L, Hepburn C, Spuler F, Stern N (2022) The economics of climate change with endogenous preferences. Resource Energy Econom. 69(1):101312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merrick JR (2009) Bayesian simulation and decision analysis: An expository survey. Decision Anal. 6(4):222–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Moore FC, Stokes A, Conte M, Dong X (2022) Noah’s ark in a warming world: Climate change, biodiversity loss, and public adaptation costs in the United States. J. Assoc. Environ. Resource Economists 9(5):981–1015.Google Scholar
• Nordhaus WD (1991) To slow or not to slow: The economics of the greenhouse effect. Econom. J. 101(444):920–937.Google Scholar
• Nordhaus WD (1992) An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. Science 258(5086):1315–1319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nordhaus W (2018) Projections and uncertainties about climate change in an era of minimal climate policies. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 10(3):333–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nordhaus W, Sztorc P (2013) DICE 2013R: Introduction and user’s manual. Technical report, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Nordhaus WD, Yang Z (1996) A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(4):741–765.Google Scholar
• Nyborg K, Anderies JM, Dannenberg A, Lindahl T, Schill C, Schlüter M, Adger WN, et al. (2016) Social norms as solutions. Science 354(6308):42–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng W, Iyer G, Bosetti V, Chaturvedi V, Edmonds J, Fawcett AA, Hallegatte S, Victor DG, van Vuuren D, Weyant J (2021) Climate policy models need to get real about people—Here’s how. Nature 594(7862):174–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piontek F, Drouet L, Emmerling J, Kompas T, Méjean A, Otto C, Rising J, Soergel B, Taconet N, Tavoni M (2021) Integrated perspective on translating biophysical to economic impacts of climate change. Nature Climate Change 11(7):563–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson KF, Baker E, Ewing E, Hemming V, Kenney MA, Runge MC (2023) Decision analysis to advance environmental sustainability. Decision Anal. 20(4):243–251.Link, Google Scholar
• Shibayama K, Fraser I (2014) Nonhomothetic growth models for the environmental Kuznets curve. Internat. Econom. Rev. 55(3):919–942.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern N, Stiglitz J, Taylor C (2022) The economics of immense risk, urgent action and radical change: Toward new approaches to the economics of climate change. J. Econom. Methodology 29(3):181–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sterner T, Persson UM (2008) An even Sterner review: Introducing relative prices into the discounting debate. Rev. Environ. Econom. Policy 2(1):61–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tol RSJ (1994) The damage costs of climate change: A note on tangibles and intangibles, applied to DICE. Energy Policy 22(5):436–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tol RSJ (2009) The economic effects of climate change. J. Econom. Perspect. 23(2):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tol RSJ (2024) A meta-analysis of the total economic impact of climate change. Energy Policy 185(1):113922.Google Scholar
• Tonin S (2019) Estimating the benefits of restoration and preservation scenarios of marine biodiversity: An application of the contingent valuation method. Environ. Sci. Policy 100(1):172–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1953) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Webster M (2008) Incorporating path dependency into decision-analytic methods: An application to global climate-change policy. Decision Anal. 5(2):60–75.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Basu A, Lontzek TS, Schmedders K (2023) The social cost of carbon when we wish for full-path robustness. Management Sci. 69(12):7585–7606.Link, Google Scholar