Using Decision Analysis to Determine the Feasibility of a Conservation Translocation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2023.0472

References

  • Brichieri‐Colombi TA, Moehrenschlager A (2016) Alignment of threat, effort, and perceived success in North American conservation translocations. Conservation Biology 30(6):1159–1172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butt N, Chauvenet ALM, Adams VM, Beger M, Gallagher RV, Shanahan DF, et al. (2021) Importance of species translocations under rapid climate change. Conservation Biology 35(3):775–783.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Canessa S, Ewen JG, West M, McCarthy MA, Walshe TV (2016) Stochastic dominance to account for uncertainty and risk in conservation decisions. Conservation Lett. 9:260–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Canessa S, Hunter D, McFadden M, Marantelli G, McCarthy MA (2014) Optimal release strategies for cost-effective reintroductions. J. Appl. Ecology 51(4):1107–1115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Canessa S, Bozzuto C, Grant E, Cruickshank S, Fisher M, Koella J, Lötters S, et al. (2018) Decision-making for mitigating wildlife diseases: From theory to practice for an emerging fungal pathogen of amphibians. J. Appl. Ecology 55(4):1987–1996.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Converse SJ, Moore CT, Armstrong DP (2013) Demographics of reintroduced populations: Estimation, modeling, and decision analysis. J. Wildlife Management 77(6):1081–1093.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • COSEWIC (2009) COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Northern Leopard Frog Lithobates pipiens, Rocky Mountain Population, Western Boreal/Prairie Populations in Canada (Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada).Google Scholar
  • Edwards HA, Converse SJ, Swan KD, Moehrenschlager A (2022) Trading off hatching success and cost in the captive breeding of Whooping Cranes. Animal Conservation 25(1):101–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerber, L, González-Suárez, M (2010) Population viability analysis: Origins and contributions. Nature Ed. Knowledge 3(10):15.Google Scholar
  • Germaine SS, Hays DW (2009) Distribution and postbreeding environmental relationships of northern leopard frogs (Rana [Lithobates] Pipiens) in Washington. Western North Amer. Nature 69(4):537–547.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Germano JM, Bishop PJ (2009) Suitability of amphibians and reptiles for translocation. Conservation Biology 23(1):7–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gregory R, Failing L, Harstone M, Long G, McDaniels T, Ohlson D (2012) Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices (Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hammond JS, Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1999) Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making Better Decisions (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Hanea AM, Hemming V, Nane GF (2021) Uncertainty quantification with experts: Present status and research needs. Risk Anal. 42(2):254–263.Google Scholar
  • Harding G, Griffiths RA, Pavajeau L (2016) Developments in amphibian captive breeding and reintroduction programs. Conservation Biology 30(2):340–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hemming V, Hanea A, Walshe T, Burgman M (2020) Weighting and aggregating expert ecological judgments. Ecology Appl. 30(4):e02075.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hemming V, Walshe TV, Hanea AM, Fidler F, Burgman MA (2018) Eliciting improved quantitative judgements using the IDEA protocol: A case study in natural resource management. PLoS One. 13(6):e0198468.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hemming V, Camaclang AE, Adams MS, Burgman M, Carbeck K, Carwardine J, Chadès I, et al. (2022) An introduction to decision science for conservation. Conservation Biol. 36(1):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hilbers, JP, Huijbregts, MAJ, Schipper, AM (2019) Predicting reintroduction costs for wildlife populations under anthropogenic stress. J. Appl. Ecology 57(1):192–201.Google Scholar
  • Hine RL, Les BL, Hellmich BF (1981) Leopard Frog Populations and Mortality in Wisconsin, vol. 122 (Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WI).Google Scholar
  • Hoffman EA, Blouin MS (2004) Evolutionary history of the northern leopard frog: reconstruction of phylogeny, phylogeography, and historical changes in population demography from mitochondrial DNA. Evolution 58(1):145–159.Google Scholar
  • Hoffmann S, Fischbeck P, Krupnick A, McWilliams M (2007) Elicitation from large, heterogeneous expert panels: Using multiple uncertainty measures to characterize information quality for decision analysis. Decision Anal. 4(2):91–109.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Howard RA (1966) Decision Analysis: Applied Decision Theory (John Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Howard RA, Abbas AE (2015) Foundations of Decision Analysis (Pearson Education, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Howard RA, Matheson JE (2005) Influence diagrams. Decision Anal. 2(3):127–143.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Idaho Department of Fish and Game (2017) Idaho State Wildlife Action Plan, 2015 (Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise).Google Scholar
  • IUCN/SSC (2013) Guidelines for reintroductions and other conservation translocations. Accessed August 1, 2021, http://www.issg.org/pdf/publications/translocation-Guidelines-2012.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson ER, Tani SN (2013) Perform probabilistic analysis and identify insights. Parnell GS, Tani SN, Johnson ER, eds. Handbook of Decision Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 248–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keelin TW (2016) The metalog distributions. Decision Anal. 13(4):243–277.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL, von Winterfeldt D (1991) Eliciting probabilities from experts in complex technical problems. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 38(3):191–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kissel AM, Palen WJ, Govindarajulu P (2017) A decision-theory approach to cost-effective population supplementation for imperiled species. Ecology Econom. 142:194–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levy H (1998) Stochastic Dominance: Investment Decision Making Under Uncertainty (Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucid M, Robinson L, Ehlers S (2016) Multi-species baseline initiative. Project report. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Coeur d’Alene, ID. https://idfg.idaho.gov/species/bibliography/1510084.Google Scholar
  • Lucid MK, Robinson L, Gygli AC, Neider J, Delima A, Ehlers S (2020) Status of pond-breeding amphibians in Northern Idaho and Northeastern Washington, USA. Herpetology Conservation Biology 15(3):526–535.Google Scholar
  • Martin TG, Kehoe L, Mantyka-Pringle C, Chades I, Wilson S, Bloom RG, Davis SK, et al. (2018) Prioritizing recovery funding to maximize conservation of endangered species. Conservation Lett. 11(6):e12604.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGowan CP, Runge MC, Larson MA (2011) Incorporating parametric uncertainty into population viability analysis models. Biology Conservation 144(5):1400–1408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McNamee P, Celona J (2007) Decision Analysis for the Professional (SmartOrg, Inc., Menlo Park, CA).Google Scholar
  • Merrell DJ (1968) A comparison of the estimated size and the “effective size” of breeding populations of the Leopard Frog, Rana pipiens. Evolution 22(2):274–283.Google Scholar
  • Morris WF, Doak DF (2002) Quantitative Conservation Biology (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA).Google Scholar
  • NatureServe (2022) NatureServe Explorer. Accessed April 20, 2022, https://explorer.natureserve.org/.Google Scholar
  • R Core Team (2021) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).Google Scholar
  • Randall L, Keating L, Stanton R, Stark D, Moehrenschlager A (2021) Feasibility Assessment for Recovery of the Northern Leopard Frog (Lithobates pipiens) in the Kootenai Valley, Idaho (Wilder Institute/Calgary Zoo, Calgary, Alberta, Canada).Google Scholar
  • Rorabaugh JC (2005) Rana pipiens Schreber, 1782. Northern leopard frog. Lannoo MJ, ed. Amphibian Declines: The Conservation Status of United States Species (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA), 570–577.Google Scholar
  • Runge MC, Converse SJ, Lyons JE, Smith DR (2020) Structured Decision Making: Case Studies in Natural Resource Management (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seaborn T, Goldberg CS (2020) Integrating genetics and metapopulation viability analysis to inform translocation efforts for the last northern leopard frog population in Washington State, USA. J. Herpetology 54(4):465–475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seddon P, Armstrong D, Maloney R (2007) Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conservation Biology 21:303–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soorae PS (2021) Global Conservation Translocation Perspectives: 2021. Case Studies from Around the Globe (IUCN SSC Conservation Translocation Specialist Group, Environment Agency, Abu Dhabi & Calgary Zoo, Calgary, Alberta, Canada).Google Scholar
  • Speirs-Bridge A, Fidler F, McBride M, Flander L, Cumming G, Burgman M (2010) Reducing overconfidence in the interval judgments of experts. Risk Anal. 30(3):512–523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swan KD, Lloyd NA, Moehrenschlager A (2018) Projecting further increases in conservation translocations: A Canadian case study. Biology Conservation 228:175–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tani SN, Parnell GS (2013a) Design creative alternatives. Parnell GS, Tani SN, Johnson ER, eds. Handbook of Decision Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 149–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tani SN, Parnell GS (2013b) Frame the decision opportunity. Parnell GS, Tani SN, Johnson ER, eds. Handbook of Decision Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 110–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trese C (2014) Boundary-Smith Creek Wildlife Management Area: 2014–2023 Management Plan. (Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Coeur d’Alene, ID). https://idfg.idaho.gov/sites/default/files/2014-2023-BoundarySCWMA-Plan-Final.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Tuljapurkar S, Caswell H (1997) Structured-Population Models in Marine, Terrestrial, and Freshwater Systems (Chapman and Hall, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White GC (2000) Population viability analysis: Data requirements and essential analyses. Boitani L, Fuller TK, eds. Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences (Columbia University Press, New York), 288–331.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.