A Decision Theoretic Foundation for Noise Traders and Correlated Speculation

References

• Abinzano I, Muga L, Santamaria R (2019) Hidden power of trading activity: The flb in tennis betting exchanges. J. Sports Econom. 20(2):261–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anscombe FJ, Aumann RJ (1963) A definition of subjective probability. Ann. Math. Statist. 34(1):199–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antoniou C, Doukas JA, Subrahmanyam A (2016) Investor sentiment, beta, and the cost of equity capital. Management Sci. 62(2):347–367.Link, Google Scholar
• Apostol TM (1974) Mathematical Analysis, 2nd ed. (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Avery C, Zemsky P (1998) Multidimensional uncertainty and herd behavior in financial markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(4):724–748.Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Bleichrodt H (2015) Testing ambiguity models through the measurement of probabilities for gains and losses. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 7(2):77–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber BM, Odean T, Zhu N (2009) Systematic noise. J. Financial Marketing 12(4):547–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black F (1986) Noise. J. Finance 41(3):529–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau BM (2017) Skewness preferences, asset prices and investor sentiment. Appl. Econom. 49(8):812–822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bossaerts P, Ghirardato P, Guarnaschelli S, Zame WR (2010) Ambiguity in asset markets: Theory and experiment. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(4):1325–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briys E, Louberge H (1985) On the theory of rational insurance purchasing: A note. J. Finance 40(2):577–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Sim M, Xiong P (2020) Robust stochastic optimization made easy with RSOME. Management Sci. 66(8):3329–3339.Link, Google Scholar
• De Long JB, Shleifer A, Summers LH, Waldmann RJ (1990) Noise trader risk in financial markets. J. Political Econom. 98(4):703–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorn D, Huberman G, Sengmueller P (2008) Correlated trading and returns. J. Finance 63(2):885–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dow J, Gorton G (2006) Noise traders. Preprint, submitted May 17, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.901857.Google Scholar
• Easley D, O’Hara M (2009) Ambiguity and nonparticipation: The role of regulation. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(5):1817–1843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eichberger J, Grant S, Kelsey D (2010) Comparing three ways to update choquet beliefs. Econom. Lett. 107(2):91–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gandhi A, Serrano-Padial R (2015) Does belief heterogeneity explain asset prices: The case of the longshot bias. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(1):156–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghirardato P, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M (2004) Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude. J. Econom. Theory 118(2):133–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. 18(2):141–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gjerstad S (2005) Risk aversion, beliefs, and prediction market equilibrium. Accessed December 8, 2019, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23748553_Risk_Aversion_Beliefs_and_Prediction_Market_Equilibrium.Google Scholar
• Glosten LR, Milgrom PR (1985) Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. J. Financial Econom. 14(1):71–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant S, Polak B (2013) Mean-dispersion preferences and constant absolute uncertainty aversion. J. Econom. Theory 148:1361–1398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han Y, Huang D, Huang D, Zhou G (2022) Expected return, volume, and mispricing. J. Financial Econom. 143(3):1295–1315.Google Scholar
• He X-Z, Treich N (2017) Prediction market prices under risk aversion and heterogeneous beliefs. J. Math. Econom. 70(1):2095–2144.Google Scholar
• Hurwicz L (1951) A class of criteria for decision-making under ignorance. Cowles Commission Discussion Paper: Statistics No. 356, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Kasperski A, Zieliński P (2016) Single machine scheduling problems with uncertain parameters and the OWA criterion. J. Scheduling 19(2):177–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar A (2009) Who gambles in the stock market? J. Finance 64(4):1889–1933.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Lee CMC (2006) Retail investor sentiment and return comovements. J. Finance 61(5):2451–2486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kyle AS (1985) Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica 53(6):1315–1336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu S (2015) Investor sentiment and stock market liquidity. J. Behav. Finance 16(1):51–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luce D, Raiffa H (1989) Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey (Dover Publications).Google Scholar
• Mallozzi L, Vidal-Puga J (2021) Uncertainty in cooperative interval games: How Hurwicz criterion compatibility leads to egalitarianism. Ann. Oper. Res. 301(1):143–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Stokey N (1982) Information, trade and common knowledge. J. Econom. Theory 26(1):17–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milnor J (1954) Games against nature. Thrall RM, Coombs CH, Davis RK, eds. Decision Processes (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 49–59.Google Scholar
• Ottaviani M, Sørensen PN (2009) Surprised by the parimutuel odds? Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):2129–2134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ottaviani M, Sørensen PN (2015) Price reaction to information with heterogeneous beliefs and wealth effects: Underreaction, momentum, and reversal. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Page L, Clemen RT (2013) Do prediction markets produce well-calibrated probability forecasts? Econom. J. (London) 123(568):491–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park A, Sabourian H (2011) Herding and contrarian behavior in financial markets. Econometrica 79(4):973–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radner R (1979) Rational expectations equilibrium: Generic existence and the information revealed by prices. Econometrica 47(3):655–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravanelli C, Svindland G (2019) Ambiguity sensitive preferences in Ellsberg frameworks. Econom. Theory 67(1):53–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein M (1976) The strong case for the generalized logarithmic utility model as the premier model of financial markets. J. Finance 31(2):551–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen J, Yu J, Zhao S (2017) Investor sentiment and economic forces. J. Monetary Econom. 86(2):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sivaprasad S, MacKenzie C (2018) The Hurwicz decision rule’s relationship to decision making with the triangle and beta distributions and exponential utility. Decision Anal. 15(3):139–153.Link, Google Scholar
• Snowberg E, Wolfers J (2010) Explaining the favorite–long shot bias: Is it risk-love or misperceptions? J. Political Econom. 118(4):723–746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stoye J (2011) Statistical decisions under ambiguity. Theory Decision 70(2):129–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tompkins RG, Ziemba WT, Hodges SD (2008) The favorite-longshot bias in S&P 500 and FTSE 100 index futures options: The return to bets and the cost of insurance. Hausch DB, Ziemba WT, eds. Handbook of Sports and Lottery Markets (North Holland, New York), 161–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trautmann ST, Van De Kuilen G (2015) Ambiguity attitudes. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (Wiley, New York), 89–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wald A (1950) Statistical Decision Functions (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Weitzman M (1965) Utility analysis and group behavior: An empirical study. J. Political Econom. 73(1):18–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wen M, Iwamura K (2008) Fuzzy facility location-allocation problem under the Hurwicz criterion. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 184(2):627–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolfers J, Zitzewitz E (2006) Interpreting prediction market prices as probabilities. NBER Working Paper No. 12200, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Yan X, Chen C, Li Y, Huang G, Li Y (2019) Analysis of industry-air quality control in ecologically fragile coal-dependent cities by an uncertain Gaussian diffusion-Hurwicz criterion model. Energy Policy 132:1191–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimper A (2012) Asset pricing in a Lucas fruit-tree economy with the best and worst in mind. J. Econom. Dynamic Control 36(4):610–628.Crossref, Google Scholar