Decision Analysis to Advance Environmental Sustainability
References
- (2014) Toward increased engagement between academic and indigenous community partners in ecological research. Ecol. Soc. 19(3).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Inclusive approaches for cumulative effects assessments. People Nat. 5(2):431–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Management of energy technology for sustainability: How to fund energy technology research and development. Production Oper. Management 23(3):348–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Who is marginalized in energy justice? Amplifying community leader perspectives of energy transitions in Ghana. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 73:101933.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Incorporate Indigenous perspectives for impactful research and effective management. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2(11):1680–1683.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The application of reflexivity for conservation science. Biol. Conserv. 262:109322.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) A decision framework for evaluating the Rocky Mountain Area wildfire dispatching system in Colorado. Decis. Anal. 20(4):276–294.Google Scholar
- (2020) The promise and reality of social and cultural metrics. Ecol. Soc. 25(3):1.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Is conservation triage just smart decision making? Trends Ecol. Evol. 23(12):649–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Making tough choices: Picking the appropriate conservation decision-making tool. Conserv. Lett. 11(2):e12418.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Resource-limited multiattribute value analysis of alternatives for immobilizing radioactive liquid process waste stored in Saluggia, Italy. Decis. Anal. 6(2):98–114.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Identifying a pathway toward recovery for depleted wild Pacific salmon populations in a large watershed under multiple stressors. J. Appl. Ecol. 59(9):2212–2226.Crossref, Google Scholar
- CMP (Conservation Measures Partnership) (2020) Open standards for the practice of conservation, version 4.0. Accessed August 4, 2023, https://conservationstandards.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/12/CMP-Open-Standards-for-the-Practice-of-Conservation-v4.0-English.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2023) Balancing tradeoffs in climate-smart agriculture: Will selling carbon credits offset potential losses in the net yield income of small-scale soybean (Glycine max L.) producers in the mid-southern United States? Decis. Anal. 20(4):252–275.Google Scholar
- (2014) Strategic foresight: How planning for the unpredictable can improve environmental decision-making. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29(9):531–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Toward a comprehensive paradigm of wildlife management: Integrating the human and biological dimensions. Mangun WR, ed. Am. Fish Wildl. Policy Hum. Dimens. (Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL), 33–54.Google Scholar
- (2018) Iterative near-term ecological forecasting: Needs, opportunities, and challenges. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 115(7):1424–1432.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Using structured decision making to guide habitat restoration for butterflies: A case study of Oregon silverspots. J. Insect Conserv. 26(2):219–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Value-of-information analysis for nuclear waste storage tanks. Decis. Anal. 5(3):157–167.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Development of a green building decision support tool: A collaborative process. Decis. Anal. 6(3):172–185.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Integrating science and local knowledge in environmental risk management: A decision-focused approach. Ecol. Econ. 64(1):47–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Science, uncertainty, and values in ecological restoration: A case study in structured decision-making and adaptive management. Restor. Ecol. 21(4):422–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Using structured decision making with landowners to address private forest management and parcelization: Balancing multiple objectives and incorporating uncertainty. Ecol. Soc. 20(4).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Decision analysis and political processes. Decis. Anal. 15(4):208–222.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Ratcheting up rigor in wildlife management decision making. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 44(1):29–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Endangered species recovery: A resource allocation problem. Science 362(6412):284–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Prioritization of species status assessments for decision support. Decis. Anal. 20(4):311–325.Google Scholar
- (2017) Using decision analysis to support proactive management of emerging infectious wildlife diseases. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15:214–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Solving B.C.’s wildfire crisis requires us to make hard choices. The Globe and Mail (September 8), https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-solving-bcs-wildfire-crisis-requires-us-to-make-hard-choices.Google Scholar
- (2008) Meaningful resource consultations with First Peoples: Notes from British Columbia. Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 50:36–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Acceptable input: Using decision analysis to guide public policy deliberations. Decis. Anal. 2(1):4–16.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices (Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Sci. Technol. Human Values 26(4):399–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making Better Life Decisions (Broadway Books, New York).Google Scholar
- (2022) An introduction to decision science for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 36(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Using value-focused thinking and multicriteria decision making to evaluate energy transition alternatives. Organ. Sci. 17(4):330–355.Google Scholar
- (2016) Stakeholder-centered development of a harvest control rule for Lake Erie walleye Sander vitreus. Edwards C, Dankel D, eds. Management Science in Fisheries: An Introduction to Simulation-Based Methods (Routledge, London), 163–183.Google Scholar
- (2023) Using decision analysis to determine the feasibility of a conservation translocation. Decis. Anal. 20(4):295–310.Google Scholar
- (1992) Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2009) Using structural equation modeling and expert elicitation to select nutrient criteria variables for south-central Florida lakes. Lake Reserv. Management 25(2):119–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Creativity in decision making with value-focused thinking. Sloan Manage. Rev. 35:33–41.Google Scholar
- (2011) Structured decision making as a proactive approach to dealing with sea level rise in Florida. Clim. Change 107(1–2):185–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Decision science as a framework for combining geomorphological and ecological modeling for the management of coastal systems. Ecol. Soc. 28(1).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Acting fast helps avoid extinction. Conserv. Lett. 5(4):274–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Financial costs of meeting global biodiversity conservation targets: Current spending and unmet needs. Science 338(6109):946–949.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Four decades of transformation in decision analytic practice for societal risk management. Risk Anal. 41(3):491–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Environmental Justice. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resource 34(1):405–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Confronting a post-pandemic new-normal—Threats and opportunities to trust-based relationships in natural resource science and management. J. Environ. Management 330:117140.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Application of decision analysis to evaluate recovery actions for threatened Snake River fall chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58(12):2447–2458.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Scenario planning: A tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conserv. Biol. 17(2):358–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) “Two-Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management. Fish Fish. 22(2):243–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Lessons learned in applying decision analysis to natural resource management for high stakes issues surrounded by uncertainty. Decis. Anal. 20(4):326–342.Abstract, Google Scholar
- (2021) Using decision analysis to collaboratively respond to invasive species threats: A case study of Lake Erie grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). J. Great Lakes Res. 47(1):108–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Advancing procedural justice in conservation. Conserv. Lett. 15(3):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Decision Analysis to Support Development of the Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Scientific Investigations Report 2015-5176. Report, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.Google Scholar
- (2011) Which uncertainty? Using expert elicitation and expected value of information to design an adaptive program. Biol. Conserv. 144(4):1214–1223.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Decision support frameworks and tools for conservation. Conserv. Lett. 11(2):e12385.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Structured decision making for managing pneumonia epizootics in bighorn sheep. J. Wildl. Management 80(6):957–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) A value-focused approach to energy transformation in the United States department of defense. Decis. Anal. 11(2):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
- (2004) The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19(6):305–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) From invisibility to transparency: Identifying the implications. Ecol. Soc. 13(2).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Conservation triage falls short because conservation is not like emergency medicine. Front. Ecol. Evol. 5:1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Adaptive Management (Adaptive Management Working Group, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
- (2007) Structured decision-making to link climate change and sustainable development. Clim. Policy. 7:353–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Moving from decision to action in conservation science. Biol. Conserv. 249:108698.Crossref, Google Scholar

