Proactively Planning for Possible Future Crises

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2024.0293

References

  • Aven T (2017) The meaning of black swans. Bier V, ed. Risk in Extreme Environments: Preparing, Avoiding, Mitigating, and Managing (Routledge, London), 33–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bier V, ed. (2017) Risk in Extreme Environments: Preparing, Avoiding, Mitigating, and Managing (Routledge, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bond SD, Carlson KA, Keeney RL (2008) Generating objectives: Can decision makers articulate what they want? Management Sci. 54(1):56–70.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C, Kunreuther H (1989) Decision processes for low probability events: Policy implications. J Policy Anal. Management 8(4):565–592. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • City of Surrey (2019) Coastal flood adaptation strategy. Report, City of Surrey, Surrey, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
  • Department of the Army (1997) FM 101-5 staff organization and operations. Report, Headquarters, Department of the Army, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Dillon R, Bier V, John R, Althenayyan A (2023) Closing the gap between decision analysis and policy analysts before the next pandemic. Decision Anal. 20(2):109–132.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Elbakidze L, McCarl B (2006) Animal disease pre-event preparedness versus post-event response: When is it economic to protect? J Agricultural Appl. Econom. 38(2):327–336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D (2002) Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Godoy M (2020) Flattening a pandemic’s curve: Why staying home now can save lives. Shots: Health News from NPR (March 13), https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/03/13/815502262/flattening-a-pandemics-curve-why-staying-home-now-can-save-lives.Google Scholar
  • Gregory R, Fischhoff B, McDaniels T (2005) Acceptable input: Using decision analysis to guide public policy deliberations. Decision Anal. 2(1):4–16.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gregory R, Harstone M, Slovic P (2018) Improving intervention decisions to prevent genocide: Less muddle, more structure. Genocide Stud. Prevention 11(3):109–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gregory R, Failing L, Harstone M, Long G, McDaniels T, Ohlson D (2012) Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices (Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hammond JS, Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1999) Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making Better Decisions (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Heuveline P (2023) The Covid-19 pandemic and the expansion of the mortality gap between the United States and its European peers. PLoS One 18(3):e0283153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hlavka J, Rose A (2023) “Unprecedented by most measures”: Calculating the astonishing economic costs of COVID. Los Angeles Times (May 15), https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2023-05-15/covid-pandemic-us-economic-costs-14-trillion.Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus, & Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
  • Keeney RL (1992) Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Keeney RL, von Winterfeldt D (2011) A value model for evaluating homeland security decisions. Risk Anal. 31(9):1470–1487.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein G (1999) Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Kolbert E (2025) Environmentalists are rethinking nuclear. Should they? New Yorker (April 7), https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/04/14/atomic-dreams-rebecca-tuhus-dubrow-book-review-the-power-of-nuclear-marco-visscher.Google Scholar
  • Meyer R, Kunreuther H (2017) The Ostrich Paradox: Why We Underprepare for Disasters (Wharton Digital Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  • Pate-Cornell E (2004) On signals, response and risk mitigation: A probabilistic approach to the detection and analysis of precursors. Phimister JR, Bier VM, Kunreuther HC, eds. Accident Precursor Analysis and Management: Reducing Technological Risk Through Diligence (National Academy of Engineering, Washington, DC), 45–59.Google Scholar
  • Sabin P (2014) Simulating War: Studying Conflict Through Simulation Games (Bloomsbury Academic, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siebert J, Keeney RL (2015) Creating more and better alternatives for decisions using objectives. Oper. Res. 63(5):1144–1158.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal. 24(2):311–322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith A (2013) Fukushima evaluation has killed more than earthquake and tsunami, survey says. NBC News (September 10), https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/fukushima-evacuation-has-killed-more-earthquake-tsunami-survey-says-flna8c11120007.Google Scholar
  • Vaillant J (2023) Fire Weather: The Making of a Beast (Alfred A. Knopf, Toronto).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.