Do People Willfully Ignore Decision Support? Evidence from an Online Experiment

References

• Aouam T, Geryl K, Kumar K, Brahimi N (2018) Production planning with order acceptance and demand uncertainty. Comput. Oper. Res. 91:145–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartlett ML, McCarley JS (2017) Benchmarking aided decision making in a signal detection task. Human Factors 59(6):881–900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bawden D, Robinson L (2009) The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety, and other paradoxes and pathologies. J. Inform. Sci. 35(2):180–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben Yaakov Y, Denisova M, Mulugeta F, Meyer J (2024) Normative or confirmative: Effects of information quality and redundancy in decision support systems. Human Factors 67(6):546–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2016) Mindful economics: The production, consumption, and value of beliefs. J. Econom. Perspect. 30(3):141–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benbasat I, Schroeder RG (1977) An experimental investigation of some MIS design variables. MIS Quart. 1(1):37–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhandari G, Hassanein K, Deaves R (2008) Debiasing investors with decision support systems: An experimental investigation. Decision Support Systems 46(1):399–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhaskara A, Skinner M, Loft S (2020) Agent transparency: A review of current theory and evidence. IEEE Trans. Human Machine Systems 50(3):215–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bigman YE, Gray K (2018) People are averse to machines making moral decisions. Cognition 181:21–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton J, Stein M-K, Jensen TB (2020) A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making. J. Behav. Decision Making 33(2):220–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrillo JD, Mariotti T (2000) Strategic ignorance as a self-disciplining device. Rev. Econom. Stud. 67(3):529–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castelo N, Bos MW, Lehmann DR (2019) Task-dependent algorithm aversion. J. Marketing Res. 56(5):809–825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cegarra J, van Wezel W (2012) Revisiting decision support systems for cognitive readiness: A contribution to unstructured and complex scheduling situations. J. Cognitive Engrg. Decision Making 6(3):299–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chakravarti D, Mitchell A, Staelin R (1979) Judgment based marketing decision models: An experimental investigation of the decision calculus approach. Management Sci. 25(3):251–263.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen D, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016) oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9:88–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cherry TL, Frykblom P, Shogren JF (2002) Hardnose the dictator. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(4):1218–1221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook SA (1983) An overview of computational complexity. Comm. ACM 26(6):400–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalal NP, Kasper GM (1994) The design of joint cognitive systems: The effect of cognitive coupling on performance. Internat. J. Human Comput. Stud. 40(4):677–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dana J, Weber RA, Kuang JX (2007) Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Econom. Theory 33(1):67–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis FD, Kottemann JE (1994) User perceptions of decision support effectiveness: Two production planning experiments. Decision Sci. 25(1):57–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Carvalho JV (1998) Exact solution of cutting stock problems using column generation and branch-and-bound. Internat. Trans. Oper. Res. 5(1):35–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Vries P, Midden C, Bouwhuis D (2003) The effects of errors on system trust, self-confidence, and the allocation of control in route planning. Internat. J. Human Comput. Stud. 58(6):719–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dzindolet MT, Peterson SA, Pomranky RA, Pierce LG, Beck HP (2003) The role of trust in automation reliance. Internat. J. Human Comput. Stud. 58(6):697–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebben MJR, Hans EW, Olde Weghuis FM (2005) Workload based order acceptance in job shop environments. OR Spectrum 27(1):107–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eil D, Rao JM (2011) The good news-bad news effect: Asymmetric processing of objective information about yourself. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 3(2):114–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epley N, Gilovich T (2016) The mechanics of motivated reasoning. J. Econom. Perspect. 30(3):133–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fahimnia B, Pournader M, Siemsen E, Bendoly E, Wang C (2019) Behavioral operations and supply chain management—A review and literature mapping. Decision Sci. 50(6):1127–1183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feiler L (2014) Testing models of information avoidance with binary choice dictator games. J. Econom. Psych. 45:253–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felgendreher S (2018) Do consumers choose to stay ignorant? The role of information in the purchase of ethically certified products. Working Papers in Economics 717, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
• Fripp J (1985) How effective are models? Omega 13(1):19–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudge WK, Lodish LM (1977) Evaluation of the effectiveness of a model based salesman’s planning system by field experimentation. Interfaces 8(1-part-2):97–106.Link, Google Scholar
• Gelders LF, Van Wassenhove LN (1982) Hierarchical integration in production planning: Theory and practice. J. Oper. Management 3(1):27–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghadimi F, Aouam T, Haeussler S, Uzsoy R (2022) Integrated and hierarchical systems for coordinating order acceptance and release planning. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 303(3):1277–1289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goddard K, Roudsari A, Wyatt JC (2014) Automation bias: Empirical results assessing influencing factors. Internat. J. Medical Informatics 83(5):368–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gogoll J, Uhl M (2018) Rage against the machine: Automation in the moral domain. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 74:97–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golman R, Hagmann D, Loewenstein G (2017) Information avoidance. J. Econom. Literature 55(1):96–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman Z (2014) Strategic ignorance and the robustness of social preferences. Management Sci. 60(11):2659–2665.Link, Google Scholar
• Grossman Z, Owens D (2012) An unlucky feeling: Overconfidence and noisy feedback. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 84(2):510–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman Z, Van der Weele JJ (2017) Self-image and willful ignorance in social decisions. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 15(1):173–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guznov S, Lyons J, Pfahler M, Heironimus A, Woolley M, Friedman J, Neimeier A (2020) Robot transparency and team orientation effects on human-robot teaming. Internat. J. Human Comput. Interaction 36(7):650–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joyner R, Tunstall K (1970) Computer augmented organizational problem solving. Management Sci. 17(4):B-212–B-225.Link, Google Scholar
• Kandul S, Ritov I (2017) Close your eyes and be nice: Deliberate ignorance behind pro-social choices. Econom. Lett. 153:54–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karp RM (1972) Reducibility among combinatorial problems. Miller RE, Thatcher JW, Bohlinger JD, eds. Complexity of Computer Computations (Springer, Boston), 85–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kavadias S, Loch CH (2004) Project Selection Under Uncertainty (Springer, Boston), 1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleywegt AJ, Papastavrou JD (2001) The dynamic and stochastic knapsack problem with random sized items. Oper. Res. 49(1):26–41.Link, Google Scholar
• Konow J (2000) Fair shares: Accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):1072–1092.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kottemann JE, Remus WE (1987) Evidence and principles of functional and dysfunctional DSS. Omega 15(2):135–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psych. Bull. 108(3):480–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laker LF, Froehle CM, Windeler JB, Lindsell CJ (2018) Quality and efficiency of the clinical decision-making process: Information overload and emphasis framing. Production Oper. Management 27(12):2213–2225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambe KA, O’Reilly G, Kelly BD, Curristan S (2016) Dual-process cognitive interventions to enhance diagnostic reasoning: A systematic review. BMJ Quality Safety 25(10):808–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehmann CA, Haubitz CB, Fügener A, Thonemann UW (2022) The risk of algorithm transparency: How algorithm complexity drives the effects on the use of advice. Production Oper. Management 31(9):3419–3434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin W, Kim S-H, Tong J (2021) What drives algorithm use? An empirical analysis of algorithm use in type 1 diabetes self-management. Preprint, submitted August 25, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3891832.Google Scholar
• Lind JT, Nyborg K, Pauls A (2019) Save the planet or close your eyes? Testing strategic ignorance in a charity context. Ecological Econom. 161:9–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madhavan P, Wiegmann DA (2007) Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems. Human Factors 49(5):773–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahmud H, Islam NA, Ahmed SI, Smolander K (2022) What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change 175:121390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McIntyre SH (1982) An experimental study of the impact of judgment-based marketing models. Management Sci. 28(1):17–33.Link, Google Scholar
• Metzger U, Parasuraman R (2005) Automation in future air traffic management: Effects of decision aid reliability on controller performance and mental workload. Human Factors 47(1):35–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Möbius MM, Niederle M, Niehaus P, Rosenblat TS (2022) Managing self-confidence: Theory and experimental evidence. Management Sci. 68(11):7793–7817.Link, Google Scholar
• Momsen K, Ohndorf M (2020) When do people exploit moral wiggle room? An experimental analysis of information avoidance in a market setup. Ecological Econom. 169:106479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Momsen K, Ohndorf M (2023) Information avoidance: Self-image concerns, inattention, and ideology. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 211:386–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moradi H (2018) Selfless ignorance: Too good to be true. Working paper, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Berlin.Google Scholar
• Mosier KL, Manzey D (2019) Humans and automated decision aids: A match made in heaven? Mouloua M, Hancock PA, eds. Human Performance in Automated and Autonomous Systems: Current Theory and Methods (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL), 19–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mosier KL, Skitka LJ, Burdick MD, Heers ST (1996) Automation bias, accountability, and verification behaviors. Proc. Human Factors Ergonomics Soc. Annual Meeting 40(4):204–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murawski C, Bossaerts P (2016) How humans solve complex problems: The case of the knapsack problem. Sci. Rep. 6:34851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly C (1980) Individuals and information overload in organizations: Is more necessarily better? Acad. Management J. 23(4):684–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patton CE, Wickens CD, Smith C, Noble KM, Clegg BA (2023) Supporting detection of hostile intentions: Automated assistance in a dynamic decision-making context. Cognitive Res. Principles Implications 8(1):69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patton CE, Clegg BA, Davis BC, Caglar T, Siebert C, Blanchard N (2025) The choice to use automation: Improvements from evidence accumulation. Internat. J. Human Comput. Interaction 41(19):12014–12031.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisinger D (2002) Heuristics for the container loading problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 141(2):382–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabin M (1994) Cognitive dissonance and social change. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 23(2):177–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Razen M, Stefan M (2019) Greed: Taking a deadly sin to the lab. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 81:164–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Croson R (2013) Overconfidence in newsvendor orders: An experimental study. Management Sci. 59(11):2502–2517.Link, Google Scholar
• Rimbaud C, Soldà A (2024) Avoiding the cost of your conscience: Belief dependent preferences and information acquisition. Experiment. Econom. 27(3):491–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schiffels S, Fliedner T, Kolisch R (2018) Human behavior in project portfolio selection: Insights from an experimental study. Decision Sci. 49(6):1061–1087.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharda R, Barr SH, McDonnell JC (1988) Decision support system effectiveness: A review and an empirical test. Management Sci. 34(2):139–159.Link, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1965) The Shape of Automation for Men and Management (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Skitka LJ, Mosier KL, Burdick M (1999) Does automation bias decision-making? Internat. J. Human Comput. Stud. 51(5):991–1006.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiekermann K, Weiss A (2016) Objective and subjective compliance: A norm-based explanation of “moral wiggle room”. Games Econom. Behav. 96:170–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starke SD, Baber C (2020) The effect of known decision support reliability on outcome quality and visual information foraging in joint decision making. Appl. Ergonomics 86:103102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan W-K, Tan C-H, Teo H-H (2012) Consumer-based decision aid that explains which to buy: Decision confirmation or overconfidence bias? Decision Support Systems 53(1):127–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tonin M, Vlassopoulos M (2013) Experimental evidence of self-image concerns as motivation for giving. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 90:19–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dongen K, Van Maanen P-P (2013) A framework for explaining reliance on decision aids. Internat. J. Human Comput. Stud. 71(4):410–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Groenendaal W (1989) Towards a workable definition of decision support systems. J. Appl. Systems Anal. 16:99–112.Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Siemsen E (2019) A meta-analysis of newsvendor experiments: Revisiting the pull-to-center asymmetry. Production Oper. Management 28(1):140–156.Crossref, Google Scholar